Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Poll: NBA #32 (after Seattle as #31)
Vancouver
San Diego
Las Vegas
Kansas City
St. Louis
Cincinnati
Pittsburgh
Montreal
Other
[Show Results]
 
Post Reply 
NBA to 32
Author Message
Wedge Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 12,628
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 377
I Root For: California
Location: Bear Territory
Post: #11
RE: NBA to 32
(09-20-2017 09:53 PM)_C2_ Wrote:  And of course, Cincinnati is actually much bigger in that, one it's a giant baseball town and, two, that it has other large markets that contribute to its fanbase, such as Louisville and Dayton.

Baltimore isn't in Washington's TV market but for a long time was the only baseball team in the region. And they are still the only AL team in the region.

Milwaukee is suspect because of its proximity to Chicago. It's closer to Chicago than San Diego is to Los Angeles. There are probably even more Cubs fans (and Bulls fans) in southern Wisconsin than there are Dodgers fans in San Diego.
09-20-2017 11:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
lew240z Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 639
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 16
I Root For: Wyoming
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Post: #12
RE: NBA to 32
There is very little interest in getting an NBA team in Saint Louis.

The largest tv market without a team is Tampa-St. Pete at 13 followed by Seattle at 14.
09-21-2017 03:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
_C2_ Online
The King of Overanalysis
*

Posts: 17,293
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 349
I Root For: Houston
Location: Near Seawall Town
Post: #13
RE: NBA to 32
(09-20-2017 11:35 PM)Wedge Wrote:  
(09-20-2017 09:53 PM)_C2_ Wrote:  And of course, Cincinnati is actually much bigger in that, one it's a giant baseball town and, two, that it has other large markets that contribute to its fanbase, such as Louisville and Dayton.

Baltimore isn't in Washington's TV market but for a long time was the only baseball team in the region. And they are still the only AL team in the region.

Milwaukee is suspect because of its proximity to Chicago. It's closer to Chicago than San Diego is to Los Angeles. There are probably even more Cubs fans (and Bulls fans) in southern Wisconsin than there are Dodgers fans in San Diego.

Cubs fans maybe. Milwaukee has more support from Wisconsin in general, just like the Packers. Maybe I'm wrong but Milwaukee in no way is a colony of Chicago.
(This post was last modified: 09-21-2017 05:20 PM by _C2_.)
09-21-2017 06:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wedge Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 12,628
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 377
I Root For: California
Location: Bear Territory
Post: #14
RE: NBA to 32
(09-21-2017 06:14 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  
(09-20-2017 11:35 PM)Wedge Wrote:  
(09-20-2017 09:53 PM)_C2_ Wrote:  And of course, Cincinnati is actually much bigger in that, one it's a giant baseball town and, two, that it has other large markets that contribute to its fanbase, such as Louisville and Dayton.

Baltimore isn't in Washington's TV market but for a long time was the only baseball team in the region. And they are still the only AL team in the region.

Milwaukee is suspect because of its proximity to Chicago. It's closer to Chicago than San Diego is to Los Angeles. There are probably even more Cubs fans (and Bulls fans) in southern Wisconsin than there are Dodgers fans in San Diego.

Cubs fans maybe. Milwaukee has more support from Wisconsin in general, just like the Packers. Maybe I'mean wrong but Milwaukee in no way is a colony of Chicago.

The local TV revenue indicates that either there are a heck of a lot of Cubs fans in Wisconsin, or fans in Wisconsin are just less enthusiastic about baseball in general. The Brewers reportedly get about $24MM/year in local TV revenue, which is near the bottom in MLB, above only teams that either have smaller TV territories (Royals) or places with weak interest in local teams (Marlins, Rays). The Padres, for example, get $39MM/year, even though the Milwaukee market alone is only 10-15% smaller than San Diego and the Brewers' Wisconsin MLB TV territory has about twice as many people as the Padres TV market, which is limited to San Diego County and the desert county to the east.
09-21-2017 10:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wedge Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 12,628
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 377
I Root For: California
Location: Bear Territory
Post: #15
RE: NBA to 32
(09-20-2017 06:37 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  It will never happen but the NBA should actually contract because there isn't enough talent to spread around.

Here's an article for you...

The 23-Team League the NBA Needs

Quote:Let’s get rid of some teams. The obviousness of it is staring you in the face. It is, after all, simple math. In a 30-team league, one team having four of the top 15 players in the world means a diluted talent pool...
Quote:So, let’s turn the clock back 30 years, to the 1987-88 season, by contracting the post-’88 expansion teams: the Miami Heat, Orlando Magic, Charlotte Hornets, Toronto Raptors, Memphis Grizzlies, New Orleans Pelicans, and Minnesota Timberwolves. Yes, I know those teams, particularly the Heat, have rich histories. Get them out of here. We have too many teams.
09-21-2017 11:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PirateTreasureNC Offline
G's up, Ho's Down ; )
*

Posts: 32,257
Joined: May 2004
Reputation: 467
I Root For: ECU Pirates,
Location:
Post: #16
RE: NBA to 32
(09-21-2017 11:52 AM)Wedge Wrote:  
(09-20-2017 06:37 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  It will never happen but the NBA should actually contract because there isn't enough talent to spread around.

Here's an article for you...

The 23-Team League the NBA Needs

Quote:Let’s get rid of some teams. The obviousness of it is staring you in the face. It is, after all, simple math. In a 30-team league, one team having four of the top 15 players in the world means a diluted talent pool...
Quote:So, let’s turn the clock back 30 years, to the 1987-88 season, by contracting the post-’88 expansion teams: the Miami Heat, Orlando Magic, Charlotte Hornets, Toronto Raptors, Memphis Grizzlies, New Orleans Pelicans, and Minnesota Timberwolves. Yes, I know those teams, particularly the Heat, have rich histories. Get them out of here. We have too many teams.

Contraction based on talent supply versus expansion based on tv revenue/market penetration .... HMM tough call.

The NBA by its own measures basically has allow talent to amass at certain teams while also allowing certain teams to run a limited roster yet get revenue sharing. I don't 100% trust the accounting practices of any pro sports league though... I find their revenue pools for the leagues as a whole and for the teams individually a dark murky soup of using all available tax loop holes to exist.

That said, for my home state Charlotte Hornets, we were a Eastern Conference factor after getting LJ and Zo.... the Glen Rice and what not.... but George Shin and his moving of the franchise originally probably alienated a lot of the NBA fans of the Hornets in the state. And its reemergence as the Bobcats expansion franchise as a complete joke for its life span under that banner did it no favors either. Going back to the Hornets was probably their smartest move but like I said, they alienated the entire state with some of their moves. When the Hornets started we had local quality broadcasts for their games all over the state, now my Hornets coverage is relegated to a SD alt channel that no one knows about unless you know about it.

The Heat have been a big success with their titles and playoff appearances, as well as the big name talent the Miami area has been able to attract.

The Orlando Magic started out so well but with the failures of keeping Shaq and Penny... they have faded out of memory from those great playoff runs they had in the mid 90s.

The Timberwolves started slow but during the KG era were decent. They are just now getting back on track again.

The Grizzlies were a utter failure in Vancouver but have seem to have righted that ship now that they are in Memphis.

The Raptors have had two good eras with Vince Carter and now they current team... but they, overall haven't really caught on.
09-21-2017 03:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wedge Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 12,628
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 377
I Root For: California
Location: Bear Territory
Post: #17
RE: NBA to 32
I read that as the writer picking an arbitrary and clean way to choose franchises to cut, not as a value judgment on particular franchises. Though at least some of those owners would be thrilled if this was really on the table and if the NBA was to pay market value for the teams being contracted, a la the infamous Bud Selig Twins/Expos contraction idea.
09-21-2017 03:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
_C2_ Online
The King of Overanalysis
*

Posts: 17,293
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 349
I Root For: Houston
Location: Near Seawall Town
Post: #18
RE: NBA to 32
(09-21-2017 03:25 AM)lew240z Wrote:  There is very little interest in getting an NBA team in Saint Louis.

The largest tv market without a team is Tampa-St. Pete at 13 followed by Seattle at 14.

That's basically Orlando, so they're covered, especially the east bay side.
09-21-2017 05:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
vandiver49 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,476
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 154
I Root For: USNA/UTK
Location: West GA
Post: #19
NBA to 32
(09-21-2017 06:14 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  
(09-20-2017 11:35 PM)Wedge Wrote:  
(09-20-2017 09:53 PM)_C2_ Wrote:  And of course, Cincinnati is actually much bigger in that, one it's a giant baseball town and, two, that it has other large markets that contribute to its fanbase, such as Louisville and Dayton.

Baltimore isn't in Washington's TV market but for a long time was the only baseball team in the region. And they are still the only AL team in the region.

Milwaukee is suspect because of its proximity to Chicago. It's closer to Chicago than San Diego is to Los Angeles. There are probably even more Cubs fans (and Bulls fans) in southern Wisconsin than there are Dodgers fans in San Diego.

Cubs fans maybe. Milwaukee has more support from Wisconsin in general, just like the Packers. Maybe I'm wrong but Milwaukee in no way is a colony of Chicago.

There are enough Cubs fans to justify the worst realignment move by Bud Selig; moving the Brewers to the NL.

To honest the NBA's situation isn't that bad. Move either the Kings or Pelicans to Seattle and contract the other along with the Nets.
(This post was last modified: 09-21-2017 06:44 PM by vandiver49.)
09-21-2017 06:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wedge Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 12,628
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 377
I Root For: California
Location: Bear Territory
Post: #20
RE: NBA to 32
(09-21-2017 06:29 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  
(09-21-2017 06:14 AM)_C2_ Wrote:  
(09-20-2017 11:35 PM)Wedge Wrote:  
(09-20-2017 09:53 PM)_C2_ Wrote:  And of course, Cincinnati is actually much bigger in that, one it's a giant baseball town and, two, that it has other large markets that contribute to its fanbase, such as Louisville and Dayton.

Baltimore isn't in Washington's TV market but for a long time was the only baseball team in the region. And they are still the only AL team in the region.

Milwaukee is suspect because of its proximity to Chicago. It's closer to Chicago than San Diego is to Los Angeles. There are probably even more Cubs fans (and Bulls fans) in southern Wisconsin than there are Dodgers fans in San Diego.

Cubs fans maybe. Milwaukee has more support from Wisconsin in general, just like the Packers. Maybe I'm wrong but Milwaukee in no way is a colony of Chicago.

There are enough Cubs fans to justify the worst realignment move by Bud Selig; moving the Brewers to the NL.

To honest the NBA's situation isn't that bad. Move either the Kings or Pelicans to Seattle and contract the other along with the Nets.

Stern engineered a new ownership group in Sacramento (which then got a new arena with public $$$) in order to stop the Kings from moving to Seattle, so they're off the table no matter how incompetently the team is run.

You could contract two teams and move a third to Seattle, leaving 28 teams, which would at least cost the owners less money than contracting six or seven as the Ringer writer suggested. But he is correct that to bring the talent level of the NBA's bottom significantly closer to the top, it would require eliminating that many teams.
09-21-2017 08:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2017 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2017 MyBB Group.