Wouldn't that make Trumps claims about wiretapping accurate?

That cant possibly be. The independent, hard charging, ever so accurate trustworthy press has told us it never happened.

the **** is about to go down...

CNN link:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/18/politics/p...index.html

Poor, poor Georgy.

(09-18-2017 07:19 PM)solohawks Wrote:  Wouldn't that make Trumps claims about wiretapping accurate?

Said this twice in the last week, probably 10 times since Inauguration.

Call it what you will. "wiretapping", eavesdropping, Get Smart or bugging. It's been pretty clear this was going on from the former, utterly corrupt Chitcago Admin for YEARS.

Apparently more than 2 +, long before the "landslide"...

(09-19-2017 12:03 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(09-18-2017 07:19 PM)solohawks Wrote:  Wouldn't that make Trumps claims about wiretapping accurate?

Said this twice in the last week, probably 10 times since Inauguration.

Call it what you will. "wiretapping", eavesdropping, Get Smart or bugging. It's been pretty clear this was going on from the former, utterly corrupt Chitcago Admin for YEARS.

Apparently more than 2 +, long before the "landslide"...

lol......But...but...but...Mach said Susan Rice was only unmasking because of a meeting with the Saudi's in late 2016!!!

By the way.....anyone notice how this CNN report is suddenly very very careful about how it parses its words regarding what it used to refer to as "Trumps groundless charges of wiretapping in Trump Tower"? Now look at how the previously laughed off charge is handled---

The Justice Department and the FBI have denied that Trump's own "wires" were tapped.
While Manafort has a residence in Trump Tower, it's unclear whether FBI surveillance of him took place there.

Notice how that leaves open the possibility that both Manafort and/or the campaign WAS wiretapped in Trump Tower. CNN now appears to only be willing to specify that the FBI and Justice Department said Trump's own phone was not wiretapped.

More fake news from CNN. We can't take anything they say seriously. Isn't that the correct response or am I reading the wrong Trump playbook?

Apparently the wiretap happened before he ever started working with the Trump campaign though. He was working with pro-Russian group during the Ukraine crisis.

Did they at least get a warrant? Because I'm sure the next president wants to know how to legally screw over his election opponent.

(09-19-2017 06:38 AM)Niner National Wrote:  Apparently the wiretap happened before he ever started working with the Trump campaign though. He was working with pro-Russian group during the Ukraine crisis.

Stopped due to lack of evidence before the campaign and then restated during the campaign. How convenient....and nobody seems to know what evidence surfaced that allowed the tap to be restarted. Hmmmmmm.

Buckle up.

(09-19-2017 09:47 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(09-19-2017 06:38 AM)Niner National Wrote:  Apparently the wiretap happened before he ever started working with the Trump campaign though. He was working with pro-Russian group during the Ukraine crisis.

Stopped due to lack of evidence before the campaign and the pin restated during the campaign. How convenient....and nobody seems to know what evidence surfaced that allowed the tap to be restarted. Hmmmmmm.

Ah okay, I hadn't read that, so thanks for the clarification

(09-19-2017 10:40 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(09-19-2017 10:40 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

You are surely aware that these are not the same things, right?

(09-19-2017 11:06 AM)Niner National Wrote:  

(09-19-2017 09:47 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(09-19-2017 06:38 AM)Niner National Wrote:  Apparently the wiretap happened before he ever started working with the Trump campaign though. He was working with pro-Russian group during the Ukraine crisis.

Stopped due to lack of evidence before the campaign and the pin restated during the campaign. How convenient....and nobody seems to know what evidence surfaced that allowed the tap to be restarted. Hmmmmmm.

Ah okay, I hadn't read that, so thanks for the clarification

Yes, but why would it be public information what the evidence is/was when it's an active investigation? So acting like something is untoward is premature.

(09-19-2017 12:27 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2017 11:06 AM)Niner National Wrote:  

(09-19-2017 09:47 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(09-19-2017 06:38 AM)Niner National Wrote:  Apparently the wiretap happened before he ever started working with the Trump campaign though. He was working with pro-Russian group during the Ukraine crisis.

Stopped due to lack of evidence before the campaign and the pin restated during the campaign. How convenient....and nobody seems to know what evidence surfaced that allowed the tap to be restarted. Hmmmmmm.

Ah okay, I hadn't read that, so thanks for the clarification

Yes, but why would it be public information what the evidence is/was when it's an active investigation? So acting like something is untoward is premature.

It was the Oblunder administration. If they were doing anything, it was untoward.

(09-19-2017 12:25 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2017 10:40 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

You are surely aware that these are not the same things, right?

lol....Only through severe parsing of words are they not. Trump said Obama wiretapped Trump tower. Well, any unbiased third party observer at this point would have to say Trump was far more CORRECT than he was incorrect. He would also have to say CNN was far more INCORRECT than correct. The construct that Trump was a crazy lunatic dispensing completely fabricated lies is totally obliterated at this point.

lol......But...but...but...Mach said Susan Rice was only unmasking because of a meeting with the Saudi's in late 2016!!!


Fake News! You voted for the right guy because you are constantly confused. You won't be able to find what you claim but it won't surprise anyone.