(09-12-2017 07:58 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  My issue is with this dude saying UCLA going to whip us on our home field because we beat ULM by 7 lol

Or 8, lol.

If Anthony Miller even put up his usual stats we probably have another 20-25 points on the 30 point lead we had on ULM

(09-12-2017 07:59 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 07:58 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  My issue is with this dude saying UCLA going to whip us on our home field because we beat ULM by 7 lol

Or 8, lol.

He clearly didn't watch the game. That game was weird with all the injuries and penalties

(09-12-2017 06:57 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 06:51 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 06:33 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  Well when you have the top qb in college football your definitely no slouch.

I'm not sure how the reigning Heisman Trophy winner, whose numbers are actually up slightly this year so far, loses the Heisman and doesn't become the number one QB pick in the draft. Plus both of Lamar Jackson games were on the road against p5 opponents, while average over 40 points a game and still hasn't thrown a pick.

Josh Rosen is outstanding but most of his great numbers this year come against downtrodden Hawaii. His adjusted QB rating suffer because he can't run while Jackson adjusted QB rating surpass Rosen because he can run. Add to the fact that Rosen has played both his games at home, a luxury that Jackson has not had yet this year.

The only reason i would put rosen ahead of him is because he is your more prototypical nfl qb. Jackson while still very good relies heavily on his mobility.

So far the only qbs in the nfl that are still playing who can be considered mobile qb's are cam newton and Russell Wilson and of those two only cam still uses his mobility a good amount of the time.

But you talked about the best QB in college football (The first quote from you in this post), not who will be the best NFL QB, so I'm confused. IMO Lamar Jackson remains the best college QB until unseated.

(09-12-2017 07:58 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  My issue is with this dude saying UCLA going to whip us on our home field because we beat ULM by 7 lol

Not saying they are going to whip you becuase of the ulm game im saying they will win decently because they are a good team. Im saying the ulm game makes me think it wont be that close.

Of course memphis has a chance to win which is why i said i think it will be close at the half.

Mainly my point is some memphis fans are making it seem like they are definitely going to win easily. My point is its a little foolish to just outright claim your going to win like its nothing.

I don't fault Memphis fans for believing they can win however. Thats to be expected.

(09-12-2017 07:55 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  I rooted for Houston to beat Arizona but I knew the win would go to some of their fans heads. Congrats on beating a ****** Arizona

Please the Arizona showed me nothing. Im still not impressed with houston or applewhite.

Plus that game has nothing to do with the point im making.

(09-12-2017 08:04 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 07:58 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  My issue is with this dude saying UCLA going to whip us on our home field because we beat ULM by 7 lol

Not saying they are going to whip you becuase of the ulm game im saying they will win decently because they are a good team. Im saying the ulm game makes me think it wont be that close.

Of course memphis has a chance to win which is why i said i think it will be close at the half.

Mainly my point is some memphis fans are making it seem like they are definitely going to win easily. My point is its a little foolish to just outright claim your going to win like its nothing.

I don't fault Memphis fans for believing they can win however. Thats to be expected.

What? Where? When did Quo become a Memphis fan?

(09-12-2017 08:01 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 07:59 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 07:58 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  My issue is with this dude saying UCLA going to whip us on our home field because we beat ULM by 7 lol

Or 8, lol.

He clearly didn't watch the game. That game was weird with all the injuries and penalties

There is a reason i dont like using elements as a reason for why a team performs however they do. Since elements affect both teams equally it can also be argued that it hindered ulm from performing better as well.

Plus most teams should be prepared to play in rain so to me its kinda a wash especially if the game is close.

(09-12-2017 08:09 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 08:01 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 07:59 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 07:58 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  My issue is with this dude saying UCLA going to whip us on our home field because we beat ULM by 7 lol

Or 8, lol.

He clearly didn't watch the game. That game was weird with all the injuries and penalties

There is a reason i dont like using elements as a reason for why a team performs however they do. Since elements affect both teams equally it can also be argued that it hindered ulm from performing better as well.

Plus most teams should be prepared to play in rain so to me its kinda a wash especially if the game is close.

You can't be this dense?













Never mind...........

(09-12-2017 07:55 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  I rooted for Houston to beat Arizona but I knew the win would go to some of their fans heads. Congrats on beating a ****** Arizona

Please don't equate this guy with UH fans. He's the one that was calling to fire Major in the first quarter last weekend. He's a freaking nut.

Here's how I see the game; Memphis wins straight up. By 10. This is a road game and kickoff will be early for guys accustomed to LA/pacific time.

I also think Memphis is better.

Don't let me down cause the conference needs this win!

Memphis by 10. Stone Cold Super Lock.

(09-12-2017 08:11 PM)CornellCoog Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 07:55 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  I rooted for Houston to beat Arizona but I knew the win would go to some of their fans heads. Congrats on beating a ****** Arizona

Please don't equate this guy with UH fans. He's the one that was calling to fire Major in the first quarter last weekend. He's a freaking nut.

Here's how I see the game; Memphis wins straight up. By 10. This is a road game and kickoff will be early for guys accustomed to LA/pacific time.

I also think Memphis is better.

Don't let me down cause the conference needs this win!

Hence why I said some Houston fans not all

(09-12-2017 08:03 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 06:57 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 06:51 PM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 06:33 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  Well when you have the top qb in college football your definitely no slouch.

I'm not sure how the reigning Heisman Trophy winner, whose numbers are actually up slightly this year so far, loses the Heisman and doesn't become the number one QB pick in the draft. Plus both of Lamar Jackson games were on the road against p5 opponents, while average over 40 points a game and still hasn't thrown a pick.

Josh Rosen is outstanding but most of his great numbers this year come against downtrodden Hawaii. His adjusted QB rating suffer because he can't run while Jackson adjusted QB rating surpass Rosen because he can run. Add to the fact that Rosen has played both his games at home, a luxury that Jackson has not had yet this year.

The only reason i would put rosen ahead of him is because he is your more prototypical nfl qb. Jackson while still very good relies heavily on his mobility.

So far the only qbs in the nfl that are still playing who can be considered mobile qb's are cam newton and Russell Wilson and of those two only cam still uses his mobility a good amount of the time.

But you talked about the best QB in college football (The first quote from you in this post), not who will be the best NFL QB, so I'm confused. IMO Lamar Jackson remains the best college QB until unseated.

But see to me its kinda a weird issue overall.

For example tom brady is clearly the best nfl qb of all time. So to me even though he didn't perform great in college i would still consider him the best college qb of his era because clearly the talent was there.

I would argue the particular michigan team he was on did not allow him to achieve the greatness in college that he achieved in the nfl.

Tom Brady is not the best NFL QB of all time

(09-12-2017 08:11 PM)CornellCoog Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 07:55 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  I rooted for Houston to beat Arizona but I knew the win would go to some of their fans heads. Congrats on beating a ****** Arizona

Please don't equate this guy with UH fans. He's the one that was calling to fire Major in the first quarter last weekend. He's a freaking nut.

Here's how I see the game; Memphis wins straight up. By 10. This is a road game and kickoff will be early for guys accustomed to LA/pacific time.

I also think Memphis is better.

Don't let me down cause the conference needs this win!

Please don't equate this elitist to some one who has right to decide that a uh fan who hasn't missed a game in 23 years isn't fan because he cant handle different opinions.

(09-12-2017 08:14 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  Tom Brady is not the best NFL QB of all time

5 super bowls says otherwise.

(09-12-2017 08:15 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 08:14 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  Tom Brady is not the best NFL QB of all time

5 super bowls says otherwise.

Guess Robert Horry is the best NBA player of all time

(09-12-2017 08:10 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 08:09 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 08:01 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 07:59 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 07:58 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  My issue is with this dude saying UCLA going to whip us on our home field because we beat ULM by 7 lol

Or 8, lol.

He clearly didn't watch the game. That game was weird with all the injuries and penalties

There is a reason i dont like using elements as a reason for why a team performs however they do. Since elements affect both teams equally it can also be argued that it hindered ulm from performing better as well.

Plus most teams should be prepared to play in rain so to me its kinda a wash especially if the game is close.

You can't be this dense?













Never mind...........

Look I understand the argument but i just hate using it. I didn't like it when some uh fans tried using as the reason we lost to navy last year either.

(09-12-2017 08:16 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 08:10 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 08:09 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 08:01 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 07:59 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Or 8, lol.

He clearly didn't watch the game. That game was weird with all the injuries and penalties

There is a reason i dont like using elements as a reason for why a team performs however they do. Since elements affect both teams equally it can also be argued that it hindered ulm from performing better as well.

Plus most teams should be prepared to play in rain so to me its kinda a wash especially if the game is close.

You can't be this dense?













Never mind...........

Look I understand the argument but i just hate using it. I didn't like it when some uh fans tried using as the reason we lost to navy last year either.

You really are..........

(09-12-2017 08:16 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 08:15 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  

(09-12-2017 08:14 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  Tom Brady is not the best NFL QB of all time

5 super bowls says otherwise.

Guess Robert Horry is the best NBA player of all time

Well for one nba is completely different than football. But who can you really say is better than tom brady.