Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
From BCS AQ to the American
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Hurricane Drummer Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,988
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 110
I Root For: Tulsa
Location:
Post: #21
RE: From BCS AQ to the American
We're P6. This thread is fake news.
09-11-2017 11:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Meatwad Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 525
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 5
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #22
RE: From BCS AQ to the American
(09-11-2017 07:16 PM)PirateTreasureNC Wrote:  
(09-11-2017 06:20 PM)fanhood Wrote:  I am sure if you spoke to any fan of a team in a P5 conference, they could not imagine a day when they were no longer "P5" or "BCS."

With that, programs like UCONN, and USF have experienced being on the inside, then ending up somewhat on the outside looking in.

Questions for those fans: At what point did you start to believe you would no longer be in a conference that was considered a "major" conference or "power" conference? Aside from money, what is the difference regarding your program now, as opposed to then?

I love realignment and expansion talk, and I have always been curious what that is like.

You did know that a majority of the current AAC members came out of the CUSA 1.0/1.5? In the first round of expansion UC, USF and Louisville?

In the 2nd round of expansion UCF, Memphis, Houston, and SMU got in with a few years left on the BE's AQ status so arguably they got to enjoy it but arguably they weren't there long enough for its affects to take effect.

The BE changing into the AAC added Tulane, Tulsa, and ECU from that same CUSA.... we have never been "AQ."
UCF took advantage of their year at the big table and had a Fiesta.
(This post was last modified: 09-12-2017 07:23 AM by Meatwad.)
09-12-2017 07:23 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Huskypride Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 689
Joined: Mar 2017
Reputation: 65
I Root For: UConn,Bad jokes
Location: Happy Town
Post: #23
RE: From BCS AQ to the American
(09-12-2017 07:23 AM)Meatwad Wrote:  
(09-11-2017 07:16 PM)PirateTreasureNC Wrote:  
(09-11-2017 06:20 PM)fanhood Wrote:  I am sure if you spoke to any fan of a team in a P5 conference, they could not imagine a day when they were no longer "P5" or "BCS."

With that, programs like UCONN, and USF have experienced being on the inside, then ending up somewhat on the outside looking in.

Questions for those fans: At what point did you start to believe you would no longer be in a conference that was considered a "major" conference or "power" conference? Aside from money, what is the difference regarding your program now, as opposed to then?

I love realignment and expansion talk, and I have always been curious what that is like.

You did know that a majority of the current AAC members came out of the CUSA 1.0/1.5? In the first round of expansion UC, USF and Louisville?

In the 2nd round of expansion UCF, Memphis, Houston, and SMU got in with a few years left on the BE's AQ status so arguably they got to enjoy it but arguably they weren't there long enough for its affects to take effect.

The BE changing into the AAC added Tulane, Tulsa, and ECU from that same CUSA.... we have never been "AQ."
UCF took advantage of their year at the big table and had a Fiesta.

We had a fiesta too but sadly a sooner ruined it...
09-12-2017 07:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Huskypride Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 689
Joined: Mar 2017
Reputation: 65
I Root For: UConn,Bad jokes
Location: Happy Town
Post: #24
RE: From BCS AQ to the American
(09-11-2017 06:20 PM)fanhood Wrote:  I am sure if you spoke to any fan of a team in a P5 conference, they could not imagine a day when they were no longer "P5" or "BCS."

With that, programs like UCONN, and USF have experienced being on the inside, then ending up somewhat on the outside looking in.

Questions for those fans: At what point did you start to believe you would no longer be in a conference that was considered a "major" conference or "power" conference? Aside from money, what is the difference regarding your program now, as opposed to then?

I love realignment and expansion talk, and I have always been curious what that is like.

It hit me When we were seeded 7th after having a pretty solid year and making the AAC final , also the fact that SMU was snubbed that year played a role in to my opinion. IK that is basketball but we had already lost our winning ways in football (Two straight before 5-7 seasonwe moved to the American.)
(This post was last modified: 09-12-2017 07:44 AM by Huskypride.)
09-12-2017 07:33 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
fanhood Online
1st String
*

Posts: 1,497
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation: 52
I Root For: San Diego State
Location:
Post: #25
RE: From BCS AQ to the American
(09-12-2017 07:33 AM)Huskypride Wrote:  
(09-11-2017 06:20 PM)fanhood Wrote:  I am sure if you spoke to any fan of a team in a P5 conference, they could not imagine a day when they were no longer "P5" or "BCS."

With that, programs like UCONN, and USF have experienced being on the inside, then ending up somewhat on the outside looking in.

Questions for those fans: At what point did you start to believe you would no longer be in a conference that was considered a "major" conference or "power" conference? Aside from money, what is the difference regarding your program now, as opposed to then?

I love realignment and expansion talk, and I have always been curious what that is like.

It hit me When we were seeded 7th after having a pretty solid year and making the AAC final , also the fact that SMU was snubbed that year played a role in to my opinion. IK that is basketball but we had already lost our winning ways in football (Two straight before 5-7 seasonwe moved to the American.)

Yea, that was brutal. With that, I think in basketball things are different. Teams can get high seeds based on a combination of their season, and their historical record (See Zaga, Cincinnati, etc).
09-12-2017 08:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
fanhood Online
1st String
*

Posts: 1,497
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation: 52
I Root For: San Diego State
Location:
Post: #26
RE: From BCS AQ to the American
(09-11-2017 07:16 PM)PirateTreasureNC Wrote:  
(09-11-2017 06:20 PM)fanhood Wrote:  I am sure if you spoke to any fan of a team in a P5 conference, they could not imagine a day when they were no longer "P5" or "BCS."

With that, programs like UCONN, and USF have experienced being on the inside, then ending up somewhat on the outside looking in.

Questions for those fans: At what point did you start to believe you would no longer be in a conference that was considered a "major" conference or "power" conference? Aside from money, what is the difference regarding your program now, as opposed to then?

I love realignment and expansion talk, and I have always been curious what that is like.

You did know that a majority of the current AAC members came out of the CUSA 1.0/1.5? In the first round of expansion UC, USF and Louisville?

In the 2nd round of expansion UCF, Memphis, Houston, and SMU got in with a few years left on the BE's AQ status so arguably they got to enjoy it but arguably they weren't there long enough for its affects to take effect.

The BE changing into the AAC added Tulane, Tulsa, and ECU from that same CUSA.... we have never been "AQ."

I was talking more about recent years with UCONN, USF, and Cincinnati, since they were indeed Big East AQ, and were part of the conference during the "transition."
09-12-2017 08:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CliftonAve Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 10,789
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 291
I Root For: #CinCityPride
Location:
Post: #27
RE: From BCS AQ to the American
(09-12-2017 08:42 AM)fanhood Wrote:  
(09-12-2017 07:33 AM)Huskypride Wrote:  
(09-11-2017 06:20 PM)fanhood Wrote:  I am sure if you spoke to any fan of a team in a P5 conference, they could not imagine a day when they were no longer "P5" or "BCS."

With that, programs like UCONN, and USF have experienced being on the inside, then ending up somewhat on the outside looking in.

Questions for those fans: At what point did you start to believe you would no longer be in a conference that was considered a "major" conference or "power" conference? Aside from money, what is the difference regarding your program now, as opposed to then?

I love realignment and expansion talk, and I have always been curious what that is like.

It hit me When we were seeded 7th after having a pretty solid year and making the AAC final , also the fact that SMU was snubbed that year played a role in to my opinion. IK that is basketball but we had already lost our winning ways in football (Two straight before 5-7 seasonwe moved to the American.)

Yea, that was brutal. With that, I think in basketball things are different. Teams can get high seeds based on a combination of their season, and their historical record (See Zaga, Cincinnati, etc).

Speaking of basketball and your original post abut how life has been different:

For Cincinnati it has been a major change. The shakeup flipped the script locally. UC has always been in a bigger conference and had more notoriety than Xavier University. Now, the narrative for the uneducated in town and the media (mostly XU supporters) is that Xavier is in a major conference while UC is a mid-major. To top it off Xavier makes double on their media deal what UC does in all-sports.

It also effected basketball recruiting for the Bearcats. While in the Big East, UC primarily recruited in NY, NJ and on the east coast. Since we have been in the AAC it has shifted to the South (although we have dabbled in some east coast cities). I'm not sure if has anything to do with the shakeup, but I would argue that this move is not a bad thing for UC, as it seems as if we have recruited higher skilled players the past few classes than we did while in the Big East. Then again that could just be because Mick thought we needed bruisers to play within that conference as opposed to now.
09-12-2017 08:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
goodknightfl Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,080
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 206
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #28
RE: From BCS AQ to the American
(09-11-2017 06:20 PM)fanhood Wrote:  I am sure if you spoke to any fan of a team in a P5 conference, they could not imagine a day when they were no longer "P5" or "BCS."

With that, programs like UCONN, and USF have experienced being on the inside, then ending up somewhat on the outside looking in.

Questions for those fans: At what point did you start to believe you would no longer be in a conference that was considered a "major" conference or "power" conference? Aside from money, what is the difference regarding your program now, as opposed to then?

I love realignment and expansion talk, and I have always been curious what that is like.

Cincy is in the same boat. but had more FB success than the other 2.
09-12-2017 09:05 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,661
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 481
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Post: #29
RE: From BCS AQ to the American
(09-11-2017 06:20 PM)fanhood Wrote:  Questions for those fans: At what point did you start to believe you would no longer be in a conference that was considered a "major" conference or "power" conference? Aside from money, what is the difference regarding your program now, as opposed to then?

I first realized we were likely to be relegated when WVU, TCU, Syracuse, and Pitt all left the Big East between September and November 2011 with the BCS contract expiration coming due the next year.

The other AQ conferences had been wanting to boot the Big East from the AQ ranks for years, the only thing that had saved us was the BCS contract language.

IOW's, there was a decent chance we were going to get booted from AQ when the BCS deal expired, even with those schools. Without them we were 100% doomed.

At a football program level, the experience of moving from AQ to G5 hasn't been fully-impacted yet. You have to remember that financially, the Big East was always the tail-end of AQ, so it's not like we went from getting $25m a year from a conference to $2m. With the distribution of Big East legacy money, we have been getting pretty much the same money that we did during the Big East days, though that is coming to an end very soon.

Pride-wise, recall again that the Big East was (unfairly, but still) regarded as the 'runt' of the AQ litter, so we were never accorded the same prestige/status as schools in the other AQ conferences got, and the AAC is given more respect than other G5.

So while we did take a prestige hit, it wasn't a huge hit, like it would be for say an SEC school going to C-USA. All that said, it still .... sucks big time.
(This post was last modified: 09-12-2017 09:11 AM by quo vadis.)
09-12-2017 09:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hood-rich Online
Smarter Than the Average Lib
*

Posts: 8,853
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 472
I Root For: ECU & CSU
Location: The Hood
Post: #30
RE: From BCS AQ to the American
(09-11-2017 06:55 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  I think its really good. The AAC is 10x better than the Big East.
LOL

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
09-12-2017 09:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2017 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2017 MyBB Group.