BC looked like a middle tier MAC team, and the score reflects that.

The Turds or Ohio would have torn them apart, like we would have couple of years ago.
But they won and we didn't. To the victor the bragging rights.

(09-02-2017 09:40 AM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  

(09-02-2017 09:34 AM)MiamiHuskie Wrote:  I've attended 5 games in the last 4 years, NIU has lost 4 of them. Starting to think it was me jinxing them until I saw what I saw last night.

Concur with all of the sentiments expressed on here about QB and especially play calling. You'd think Carey would be at least mediocre by now but he's gotten worse.
D played well, O would have been more effective with a better pass game. Wimann pulled us out several times on the short passes; seems we now longer have a long-ball threat with Golladay gone.

That being said, good to see fellow Huskies, thanks for the hospitality.
Sad to see so many empty seats on such a perfect football night, though.

Blake is not a deep threat and I dont know why hes the guy they send downfield. He gets zero separation. Send Tears or Wesley. Wimann is a stud and will be a big part of the O this year, but he had a HUGE drop.

Exactly. I thought Tears looked better than him.

I'm not embarrassed by the team I'm embarrassed by this sad excuse for the leader of the team. He won't give them a chance to win.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(09-02-2017 08:32 AM)Suptroop Wrote:  Wow

First to admit a lot bothered me about that game. Throwing deep on 3rd and 1, Time management, Graham...

But shame on those that are "embarrassed " after their performance.

-Hare three under 90 yard and an interception...that was with a full years starting experience.
-we had just under 400 yard offense compared to like 150! 400 yard against BC can easily translate to 500+ pretty much any other game we play.
-the team is all youth. Look at the already emerging players and how many years they still have to grow. The roster is only getting stronger and team getting better.
-without looking at numbers, NIU looked like the better team and at times bullied their offense. Even a bad Acc team they're still acc recruited and coached.
-most importantly to me, the team,specifically defense, had its swagger back. Something that lacked particularly last year. They were confident, fast,strong...nowhere reminiscent of last years disgruntled bunch.

I'm excited to see how these players grow throughout the season and in future years. Feel very optimistic.

Lol now people are hating on Lurry all of a sudden and declaring the great cramping conspiracy. Sooo willing to throw ANYONE to the wolves for absolutely nothing. Lurry didn't even have a bad game, what the hell.

Yall can be "embarrassed ". I'm disappointed and optimistic. Regardless that team will never be an embarrassment to me.

Good.

(09-02-2017 01:13 AM)huskie1stdown Wrote:  

(09-02-2017 12:39 AM)BDB5yp Wrote:  

(09-02-2017 12:35 AM)armour248 Wrote:  I do want to say that I feel for the defense. They played their asses off and got no help. Sutton Smith and Kyle Pugh in particular. Sad that we cant put together anything that resembles a mediocre college offrnse

+1

+2
That 3rd and long pass play in the 4th sucked though.

Sent from my Pixel C using CSNbbs mobile app

(09-02-2017 11:17 AM)Turner4Heisman Wrote:  I'm not embarrassed by the team I'm embarrassed by this sad excuse for the leader of the team. He won't give them a chance to win.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Very true statement, never have seen a coach put his players in position to maximize opportunity to fail more often than this coach.

(09-02-2017 10:23 AM)MiamiHuskie Wrote:  BC looked like a middle tier MAC team, and the score reflects that.

The Turds or Ohio would have torn them apart, like we would have couple of years ago.
But they won and we didn't. To the victor the bragging rights.

If we had Maddie, we would've whupped 'em...