Trump just couldn't wait to obstruct justice... again.
But you're down with this, right?
lol
I don't even know who that is.
I'm just glad you guys are ok with Trump asking the law to look the other way when his friends are involved. Didn't take him long to become just another swamp monster.
It just came natural to him.
(08-27-2017 12:09 PM)Paul M Wrote: So the tweet is in fact a hoax.
So you are an Obama fluffer now?
Damn dude, it's a freaking lie. I swear, you Trumpers are every bit as bad as the left with your lies and "fake" news.
Arpaio was denied his constitutional right to a jury trial. You know what group likes to deny people their constitutional rights? Antifa. Are you a card carrying member now?
It doesnt matter if it was a pardon or not. Obama was directly responsible for allowing a criminal out of prison early, in which he then went on to kill 3 people. Obama didnt have to pardon this particular man (although by the list of pardons he granted he would have) because he signed a law that got him out of prison early without a pardon.
So the point, which you wont get because you still dont get why Trump is your president, is that even if Obama didnt technically pardon the man, he basically pardoned the guy. And if the law he signed wasnt in place, he would have pardoned him.
Clear enough now? Or are you going to keep up your butthurt "I'm in love with Obama" rant?
It matters if it was a pardon or not when the fake claim is it's a pardon. If, as you admit, Obama didn't technically pardon him, he didn't pardon him. And then to add more lies on top of the heap, you just pull out of your ass, and sniff it, Obama WOULD have pardoned him if he weren't released. Should have just left that in your ass were it belonged.
Don't know when some on the "fake ass" right decided lying doesn't matter. Oh, that's right. It's when they got behind a liar.
You've gotten real stupid as of late. "I'm in love with Obama." "Card carrying member of antifa." god you're a pathetic loser.
You are really sounding unhinged. Perhaps you need to give Obama a hug.
What's the problem. You admit the tweet is a lie then insist that even though it's a lie, it's still true. It doesn't matter that he wasn't pardoned by Obama "'cause he got an early release that wasn't a pardon". You need help finding "unhinged" on google?
(08-27-2017 02:06 PM)Paul M Wrote: What's the problem. You admit the tweet is a lie then insist that even though it's a lie, it's still true. It doesn't matter that he wasn't pardoned by Obama "'cause he got an early release that wasn't a pardon". You need help finding "unhinged" on google?
The best part is the story actually originated on a website that created fake news stories in an attempt to show how clueless Trump supporters will eat this garbage up . Clearly worked in this case. Sad
This wasn't anything close to a pardon. It's not in the same ballpark. It's not even on the same planet.
The Fair Sentencing Act was a bipartisan bill that Obama signed after it passed in the House and Senate. Republicans, across the spectrum, from Jeff Sessions to Rand Paul, supported it (Rand Paul even tried to pass a bill that weny much further in reducing crack sentences).
The tweet and the story are 100% fake. It's pathetic and gross to try and pin those deaths on Obama.
(08-27-2017 02:06 PM)Paul M Wrote: What's the problem. You admit the tweet is a lie then insist that even though it's a lie, it's still true. It doesn't matter that he wasn't pardoned by Obama "'cause he got an early release that wasn't a pardon". You need help finding "unhinged" on google?
The best part is the story actually originated on a website that created fake news stories in an attempt to show how clueless Trump supporters will eat this garbage up . Clearly worked in this case. Sad
This wasn't anything close to a pardon. It's not in the same ballpark. It's not even on the same planet.
The Fair Sentencing Act was a bipartisan bill that Obama signed after it passed in the House and Senate. Republicans, across the spectrum, from Jeff Sessions to Rand Paul, supported it (Rand Paul even tried to pass a bill that weny much further in reducing crack sentences).
The tweet and the story are 100% fake. It's pathetic and gross to try and pin those deaths on Obama.
Good stuff. Fo's reaction should be everyones when shown what was presented as truth is a lie. Don't know how these guys reciting the mantra "fake news" about every thing, most of which isn't, just things they don't agree with or like, can push so much fake news themselves and continue promoting a lie after being shown it's such. This was pretty good though, having UofM admit it was fake but "so what, it's still true". It was 4 Pinocchio's AND Pants on Fire. Mind boggling someones soul could be so empty of conscience. Must be a card carrying member of antifa.
Let's take stock here... This is an 85 year old who gave his whole life to public service that was found guilty of contempt of court (not a violent crime) who was pardoned... OMG the horror...
(08-28-2017 04:51 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote: Let's take stock here... This is an 85 year old who gave his whole life to public service that was found guilty of contempt of court (not a violent crime) who was pardoned... OMG the horror...
But he committed the crime of enforcing immigration laws against the [then leftist] government's wishes.
(08-28-2017 04:51 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote: Let's take stock here... This is an 85 year old who gave his whole life to public service that was found guilty of contempt of court (not a violent crime) who was pardoned... OMG the horror...
But he committed the crime of enforcing immigration laws against the [then leftist] government's wishes.
Yup. Let's face it, this was the real "crime" they were going to get him for. Had to come up with something. How could he be denied his right to a trial by jury? Can a judge to that? Then sit as the presiding judge? Is that what happened here? Yikes if so.
More on this case. Story if true is pretty disturbing abuse by federal judge Snow.
"7. During several days of hearing, Judge Snow
-asked leading questions,
-gave his own version of the facts,
-conducted his own investigation outside the courtroom,
-argued with witnesses, and
-was extremely interested in what evidence existed concerning the statement he made to his wife that he would do all that he could to make sure that Sheriff Arpaio is not elected.
8. One thing is very clear. Several witnesses heard Judge Snow’s wife say, in substance, that her husband (Judge Snow) wanted to do whatever he could to make sure that Sheriff Arpaio [was] not reelected. The witnesses may not recall or agree on the exact language that Judge Snow’s wife used, but they do agree on the substance and import of the statement."
![[Image: oscar-lopez-rivera.jpg_1718483346.jpg]](http://www.telesurtv.net/__export/1484691801451/sites/telesur/img/news/2017/01/17/oscar-lopez-rivera.jpg_1718483346.jpg)
![[Image: o-BRADLEY-MANNING-TRIAL-facebook.jpg]](http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1169189/images/o-BRADLEY-MANNING-TRIAL-facebook.jpg)
god you're a pathetic loser.
![[Image: DIM8KsQUQAAEhDX.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DIM8KsQUQAAEhDX.jpg)
