(08-16-2017 02:36 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  He was one of the "good guys", who killed one of the communist, according to one poster.

Didn't that. You got a link?

(08-16-2017 04:17 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 04:07 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 03:59 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  He is a radicalized domestic terrorists.

I agree. What is good for the goose (radical Islamic terrorism) is good for the gander (radical white supremacist.)

I have zero problem with that if it is indeed proven to be the case. I haven't seen it yet. When an ISIS drives a truck down through the fairgrounds on Bastille day, that's pretty easy to call, this one? I don't think everything is known about it yet.

No, but if you watched that documentary video that has been posted a couple times, it appears he jammed on the accelerator a good ways from the crowd.

(08-16-2017 03:59 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  He is a radicalized domestic terrorists.

He can clone himself? That's not good.

(08-16-2017 04:32 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 02:36 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  He was one of the "good guys", who killed one of the communist, according to one poster.

Didn't that. You got a link?

Post #30 in the original thread that was moved to the wild west room.

So essentially we don't know anything about this guy.

Why would we not know everything from his voting record to his shoe size to his sexual preference by now???

Is he that boring?

(08-16-2017 04:44 PM)Claw Wrote:  So essentially we don't know anything about this guy.

Why would we not know everything from his voting record to his shoe size to his sexual preference by now???

Is he that boring?

Must be a registered Democrat.

(08-16-2017 04:25 PM)Claw Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 04:13 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  I heard early on, and haven't heard much since, and have NO idea if any of it is true or not- I think it was an interview with his mother, she was watching his cat or something while he was on a "trip", that he has been treated for some kind of ADHD or other psycho-therapeutic "issue", and that he hadn't been taking his meds for some time for whatever reason. IOW's, he's unstable already, and probably shouldn't have been behind the wheel of a car or that far from home-base under any circumstances.

He did, however, have the presence of mind to remove the tags from his car. So, depending on whether that was before or after the tragic incident may go a long way to illustrating intent or not. Guess we'll see. Fortunately for him we (supposedly) no longer have mob rule in this Country.

There are rear tags clearly visible in the videos. Did he switch the tags? Or are you saying he had to have removed them after the incident?

Don't know, that's kind of the point. A number of things about what and when I heard this-
Not sure where or from whom I heard or watched that.
It could have been a simple mistake by some reporter,- Va. requires tags on front and back. Maybe the reporter or source only got a head-on view of the car and Ohio doesn't require or issue a front tag(?) Dunno.

I haven't really seen the video(s) except one, and it was taken from a sidewalk or something, no front or rear view at all. So, if there was/is a tag there, then yes obviously he (or someone helping him(?) would have to have done so after.

My only point in bringing that up was to say if the tags were indeed removed prior (apparently not), that would spell pretty clear intent to use the vehicle as a weapon. NOT doing so similarly doesn't clear him by any measure, but removes one factor of clear intent.

(08-16-2017 04:43 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 04:32 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 02:36 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  He was one of the "good guys", who killed one of the communist, according to one poster.

Didn't that. You got a link?

Post #30 in the original thread that was moved to the wild west room.

That's what you gathered from this?

Quote:I'm watching the Fox News story in Charlottesville and I can't tell the good guys UTR from the Antifa communists. They need armbands. 03-wink or something.

The same thing in our coming wars. It seems everyone is wearing American style helmets now. How will we able to tell who to shoot?

Your obvious struggles with reading comprehension make your asinine posting history very clear now.

(08-16-2017 04:32 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 04:17 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 04:07 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 03:59 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  He is a radicalized domestic terrorists.

I agree. What is good for the goose (radical Islamic terrorism) is good for the gander (radical white supremacist.)

I have zero problem with that if it is indeed proven to be the case. I haven't seen it yet. When an ISIS drives a truck down through the fairgrounds on Bastille day, that's pretty easy to call, this one? I don't think everything is known about it yet.

No, but if you watched that documentary video that has been posted a couple times, it appears he jammed on the accelerator a good ways from the crowd.

Yea, that isn't going to help his case, that's for sure. I'd only ask one question about that, why? I've heard and read different theories, "reasons" whatever, and not all of them say- "to intentionally run people over and kill as many as possible."

But, that could well be the case, and if so? Buh -bye asshat, enjoy your 20's an 30's indoors.

(08-16-2017 04:48 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 04:44 PM)Claw Wrote:  So essentially we don't know anything about this guy.

Why would we not know everything from his voting record to his shoe size to his sexual preference by now???

Is he that boring?

Must be a registered Democrat.

Bernie-bro.

(08-16-2017 04:48 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 04:25 PM)Claw Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 04:13 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  I heard early on, and haven't heard much since, and have NO idea if any of it is true or not- I think it was an interview with his mother, she was watching his cat or something while he was on a "trip", that he has been treated for some kind of ADHD or other psycho-therapeutic "issue", and that he hadn't been taking his meds for some time for whatever reason. IOW's, he's unstable already, and probably shouldn't have been behind the wheel of a car or that far from home-base under any circumstances.

He did, however, have the presence of mind to remove the tags from his car. So, depending on whether that was before or after the tragic incident may go a long way to illustrating intent or not. Guess we'll see. Fortunately for him we (supposedly) no longer have mob rule in this Country.

There are rear tags clearly visible in the videos. Did he switch the tags? Or are you saying he had to have removed them after the incident?

Don't know, that's kind of the point. A number of things about what and when I heard this-
Not sure where or from whom I heard or watched that.
It could have been a simple mistake by some reporter,- Va. requires tags on front and back. Maybe the reporter or source only got a head-on view of the car and Ohio doesn't require or issue a front tag(?) Dunno.

I haven't really seen the video(s) except one, and it was taken from a sidewalk or something, no front or rear view at all. So, if there was/is a tag there, then yes obviously he (or someone helping him(?) would have to have done so after.

My only point in bringing that up was to say if the tags were indeed removed prior (apparently not), that would spell pretty clear intent to use the vehicle as a weapon. NOT doing so similarly doesn't clear him by any measure, but removes one factor of clear intent.

Link to the site with the video that shows the plates.

Looks like there are photos showing him in the crowd as a "Nazi" protester.

(08-16-2017 04:48 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Maybe the reporter or source only got a head-on view of the car and Ohio doesn't require or issue a front tag(?) Dunno.

Ohio requires both.

http://brilliantmaps.com/license-plate/

It's tragic that such a young person would choose to throw their life away on something so pathetic.

(08-16-2017 06:06 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  It's tragic that such a young person would choose to throw their life away on something so pathetic.

I'm interested in learning more details. I'm not 100% convinced he was out to kill people. If he was, he wasn't very good at it.

Maybe he has Parkinson's and got a twitch at the wrong place at the wrong time. The front plate probably fell of when he went to ramming folks with his car.

(08-16-2017 07:16 PM)nutbushtiger Wrote:  Maybe he has Parkinson's and got a twitch at the wrong place at the wrong time. The front plate probably fell of when he went to ramming folks with his car.

The front of the car held up pretty well all things considered. It was still running. The rear end just fell off though. Dodge has some work to do there.

On a more serious note, I believe the woman who died was between the two cars in front of him.

(08-16-2017 06:03 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 04:48 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Maybe the reporter or source only got a head-on view of the car and Ohio doesn't require or issue a front tag(?) Dunno.

Ohio requires both.

http://brilliantmaps.com/license-plate/

Require both, but don't enforce the front tag much. Many cars front ends don't accept front tags easily, hence far from all Ohio cars have front plates..

(08-16-2017 06:57 PM)Claw Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 06:06 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  It's tragic that such a young person would choose to throw their life away on something so pathetic.

I'm interested in learning more details. I'm not 100% convinced he was out to kill people. If he was, he wasn't very good at it.

I don't know.

I guess I'm interested in see if there is another side to it but I'm pretty convinced he did what he did on purpose and just sucked at it.

(08-16-2017 06:03 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 04:48 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Maybe the reporter or source only got a head-on view of the car and Ohio doesn't require or issue a front tag(?) Dunno.

Ohio requires both.

http://brilliantmaps.com/license-plate/

K.

To you and Claw, I didn't know and hadn't looked. Just wondering why a reporter may have thought the tags were, or had been, removed during a live shot. Pure speculation.