(07-21-2017 08:36 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  They are investigating a hell of a lot more than that!!! Guilty as sin and you stick your head in the sand. Treasonous

It's not treasonous simply because you disagree with it.

To be treason it would have to in some way harm the U.S. government.

An election is not part of the government.

The reality is that Trump had no access, power, or ability to even do anything treasonous before he was elected.

There isn't even a clear crime here. There is certainly no treason.

(07-20-2017 11:03 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Mueller is going beyond the scope of his mandate. Total witch hunt. Can his ***.

But he's a fellow republican.

(07-21-2017 03:57 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  You guys can't possibly be this stupid. You can't. All of the smoke surrounding Russia. Mueller has been at his job for two months. On Wednesday he requested records from Kushner and Trimp related to three financial deals with Russian connections. On Thursday we get this. Forget what he says. Follow his actions. His actions are the biggest admittance of guilt. Wake the F up.

You have been wrong about EVERYTHING for a long time now.

You dims keep pickin those goobers, you will put Trump in the White House another 4 years, talk about dumb.

(07-22-2017 05:57 AM)nutbushtiger Wrote:  You dims keep pickin those goobers, you will put Trump in the White House another 4 years, talk about dumb.

Can't be worse than the birther nonsense.

(07-22-2017 06:11 AM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  

(07-22-2017 05:57 AM)nutbushtiger Wrote:  You dims keep pickin those goobers, you will put Trump in the White House another 4 years, talk about dumb.

Can't be worse than the birther nonsense.

I agree the birther stuff was nonsense but it didn't come close to this widespread obsession with Russia. If nothing comes from all this after they have gone all in every minute of every day they will be hurting in the next elections. The average Joe just sees dead end after dead end with no crime. IMPEACH!!!!!!

Wow. The presidency is disintegrating around this wreck of an administration and that is your take. Delusional.

(07-22-2017 07:14 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Wow. The LEFT is disintegrating around this wreck of a Russian nothingburger with no crimes and that is your take. Delusional.

Fixed it for you. You don't start worrying about policy and realize why you lost last time, its gonna happen again. Keep focusing on Russians...lol. Have a nice Saturday.

(07-22-2017 07:23 AM)nutbushtiger Wrote:  

(07-22-2017 07:14 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Wow. The LEFT is disintegrating around this wreck of a Russian nothingburger with no crimes and that is your take. Delusional.

Fixed it for you. You don't start worrying about policy and realize why you lost last time, its gonna happen again. Keep focusing on Russians...lol. Have a nice Saturday.

shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh......let 'em keep ramblin' man

the country is better off that way....

they're on tilt after being guided by 8 years of inadequacy....

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/20...ueller.php

"...Mueller evidently hasn’t found any evidence linking the Trump campaign to whatever the Russians did during the 2016 campaign–no one else has either–so instead of giving up, he is broadening his investigation to include President Trump’s business dealings:
FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said.
What on God’s green Earth do the 2013 Miss Universe pageant or Trump’s sale of a house in 2008 have to do with Russian interference in the 2016 election? Nothing. Some have tried to argue that the Miss Universe pageant is relevant, on the ground that Donald Trump, Jr. met Rob Goldstone, who years later introduced him to a Russian lawyer, there.
But so what? Mueller apparently doesn’t have any evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russians to spear phish the DNC’s email accounts, and no matter how much he investigates the Miss Universe pageant, or Trump’s 2008 sale of a house, he still won’t have any such evidence...."

(07-22-2017 03:43 AM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  

(07-20-2017 11:03 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Mueller is going beyond the scope of his mandate. Total witch hunt. Can his ***.

But he's a fellow republican.

He is? Do most Republicans give money to Obama and Hillary?

(07-22-2017 12:03 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(07-22-2017 03:43 AM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  

(07-20-2017 11:03 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Mueller is going beyond the scope of his mandate. Total witch hunt. Can his ***.

But he's a fellow republican.

He is? Do most Republicans give money to Obama and Hillary?

A lot of political Republicans including some Tea Party Republicans donated and worked for Hillary's campaign. They still do not trust Trump one bit. There are still the Never-Trumpers out there from the Republican Party in the house and Senate, and retired still will not work to help Trump out.

(07-22-2017 02:36 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(07-22-2017 12:03 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(07-22-2017 03:43 AM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  

(07-20-2017 11:03 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Mueller is going beyond the scope of his mandate. Total witch hunt. Can his ***.

But he's a fellow republican.

He is? Do most Republicans give money to Obama and Hillary?

A lot of political Republicans including some Tea Party Republicans donated and worked for Hillary's campaign. They still do not trust Trump one bit. There are still the Never-Trumpers out there from the Republican Party in the house and Senate, and retired still will not work to help Trump out.

And there you have it. You have a Trump hating special prosecutor with a bevy of hand picked Trump hating US Attorneys trying thier best to find a crime....and failing. Thus the expansion of "investigation" as far back as necesssry to find something (anything) to try to prosecute. It's the scariest thing I've ever seen. It's Big Brother in real life. Simply chilling. The swamp has teeth.

They aren't looking for crimes. The deep state is playing politics and is simply using the power of the Justice Department to overthrow the election. If your going to misuse power---I have zero problem with Trump fighting back with the Constititional powers he has. What you are missing is this is about to become constitutional crises. The powers granted to the chief executive are there for a reason. It's the last check against abuse of power by the unethical. None of this bothers me because this is exactly how this stuff is supposed to happen. Everywhere else it requires a civil war.

(07-22-2017 02:51 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(07-22-2017 02:36 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(07-22-2017 12:03 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(07-22-2017 03:43 AM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  

(07-20-2017 11:03 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Mueller is going beyond the scope of his mandate. Total witch hunt. Can his ***.

But he's a fellow republican.

He is? Do most Republicans give money to Obama and Hillary?

A lot of political Republicans including some Tea Party Republicans donated and worked for Hillary's campaign. They still do not trust Trump one bit. There are still the Never-Trumpers out there from the Republican Party in the house and Senate, and retired still will not work to help Trump out.

And there you have it. You have a Trump hating special prosecutor with a bevy of hand picked Trump hating US Attorneys trying thier best to find a crime....and failing. This the expansion of "investigation" as far back as necesssry to find something (anything) to try to prosecute. It's the scariest thing I've ever seen. It's Big Brother in real life. Simply chilling. The swamp has teeth.

that was enough to make me spit the screen...and the rest is easily as trans as that jenner feller/chick/wtfe it is....

Kushner SF 86. Omitted over 100 contacts with Russians. There is your felony.


"I have seen a few rare cases where criminal charges were pursued, mostly in instances where the falsification was egregious and involved withholding information on serious criminal conduct. In all of these cases the individual was found guilty and convicted of a felony offense. For the rest of the cases, agencies would rather just deny or revoke the individual’s security clearance and terminate their relationship with the agency in order to move on to the next candidate. The caveat for that individual is that now they will have additional adverse information to disclose on any future security clearance application, which may impact them being offered employment."

http://www.businessinsider.com/kushners-...ism-2017-7

https://news.clearancejobs.com/2016/04/0...stigation/

(07-22-2017 08:13 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Kushner SF 86. Omitted over 100 contacts with Russians. There is your felony.


"I have seen a few rare cases where criminal charges were pursued, mostly in instances where the falsification was egregious and involved withholding information on serious criminal conduct. In all of these cases the individual was found guilty and convicted of a felony offense. For the rest of the cases, agencies would rather just deny or revoke the individual’s security clearance and terminate their relationship with the agency in order to move on to the next candidate. The caveat for that individual is that now they will have additional adverse information to disclose on any future security clearance application, which may impact them being offered employment."

this is the point en macro polo....

they always use the "disclaimer".....if not, then it 'could possibly' become libel/slander via the internutz....

it's a slime game man...and it exists on both sides whilst the media views it in that fashion....this is why DJT is tossing out bs tweets and using the pen to set up the next event....

you guys are currently losing the battle and don't understand why.....

(07-22-2017 08:16 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  http://www.businessinsider.com/kushners-...ism-2017-7

https://news.clearancejobs.com/2016/04/0...stigation/

who are "people"? and why do "they" matter? "SEVERAL NEWS OUTLETS"......

that's hardly proving a crime exists......

and the latter link is about as useless an argument as it gets.....

#STILLNOCOLLUSION

#MUHRUSSIA

#MYLAUGHTER

Mach, you were okay when Ken Starr did this to Bill Clinton, right?

I mean, you're fine with taking the scope beyond collusion with Russia to anything Bobby Three Sticks can find, right? Surely you felt the same way with Starr and Whitewater, right?

(07-22-2017 09:46 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Mach, you were okay when Ken Starr did this to Bill Clinton, right?

I mean, you're fine with taking the scope beyond collusion with Russia to anything Bobby Three Sticks can find, right? Surely you felt the same way with Starr and Whitewater, right?

it's easily now to the point of, "**** it, why attempt to run a country with the largest economic hammer in the history of mankind (rhetorical)....we got da votes now"

\signed,

A. Democrat