Trump sets red line for Mueller on Russia probe, warns he'll expose 'conflicts'

President Trump’s frustration with the Russia probe boiled over in a fiery new interview where he set a red line for Special Counsel Robert Mueller, warning against digging into his family finances beyond the Russia scope and suggesting he’ll soon start talking about the ex-FBI director’s “conflicts.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/...licts.html

Exposed: FBI Director James Comey’s Clinton Foundation Connection

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidenti...onnection/

Could be a lot more coming.

All he does is talk. If you pay attention, you'll notice he'll make wild threat's about things he already knows is happening.

Well look at this. Speak of the devil.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/muell...00831.html

(07-20-2017 11:12 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  All he does is talk. If you pay attention, you'll notice he'll make wild threat's about things he already knows is happening.

Well look at this. Speak of the devil.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/muell...00831.html

so he is all talk and no action?

hmm wonder if they are getting close.. its a shame that a President is under this microscope..

But if there is nothing to hide not sure why so concerned. And maybe if his team would of been more honest, they would not have to pry and dig to get the information.

(07-20-2017 11:20 AM)Greenroom Wrote:  hmm wonder if they are getting close.. its a shame that a President is under this microscope..

But if there is nothing to hide not sure why so concerned. And maybe if his team would of been more honest, they would not have to pry and dig to get the information.

Well if this article is correct, Mueller is doing what all these special prosecutors do and just endlessly expand their scope to justify their existence. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ansactions

"...FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said.

John Dowd, one of Trump’s lawyers, said on Thursday he was unaware of this element of the investigation. "Those transactions are in my view well beyond the mandate of the Special counsel; are unrelated to the election of 2016 or any alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia and most importantly, are well beyond any Statute of Limitation imposed by the United States Code," he wrote in an email...."

Investigation of the Miss Universe and Florida mansion sale is WAAAAYYY beyond the scope as Trump had not even seriously considered running for president at that point.

I hope everyone has run a tight ship that is doing the investigation.

If Mueller and others go where they are not suppose too then Trump will out them all. I know people have been saying that Trump does not need to challenge this or that but it is a two way street.

Need I remind everyone that a sitting President can only be removed by congress and the Justice Department works for the President. He can get access to any information he wants.

This is going to be interesting to watch.

When will the Trumpies realize that the man is a traitor to the United States, and is bilking the country of tens of millions of dollars?



Probably never, which shows how ignorant the average Trump voter is.

(07-20-2017 11:48 AM)dbackjon Wrote:  When will the Trumpies realize that the man is a traitor to the United States, and is bilking the country of tens of millions of dollars?



Probably never, which shows how ignorant the average Trump voter is.

MUH RUSSIA!!!

(07-20-2017 11:48 AM)dbackjon Wrote:  When will the Trumpies realize that the man is a traitor to the United States, and is bilking the country of tens of millions of dollars?



Probably never, which shows how ignorant the average Trump voter is.

Have you admitted that Hillary was and is a bigger traitor to the USA yet? Judging by this ignorant post, I'd say no.

All hell breaks loose if he fires Mueller. Even the most partisan would have to raise an eye brow then. Does make you wonder though. What does this guy have to worry about? Can you imagine the uproar if Clinton mentioned to fire Starr? Think outside the box righties. What would you be thinking if these situations were reversed? Let's look both ways. If you are coming from the side that trump is innocent. The investigation is a nuisance. If he's guilty he has to stop this investigation. How would he behave under both scenarios. DO NOT LISTEN TO WHAT HE says. ONLY FOLLOW HIS ACTIONS.

(07-20-2017 11:48 AM)dbackjon Wrote:  When will the Trumpies realize that the man is a traitor to the United States, and is bilking the country of tens of millions of dollars?



Probably never, which shows how ignorant the average Trump voter is.

I am no fan of President Trump.

But in no way is he a traitor of this great country. Just like President Obama had a vision of what makes the US great, so does President Trump. And that is what makes the United States the best country in the world.

And sorry the average voter on both sides are ignorant.

(07-20-2017 12:00 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  All hell breaks loose if he fires Mueller. Even the most partisan would have to raise an eye brow then. Does make you wonder though. What does this guy have to worry about? Can you imagine the uproar if Clinton mentioned to fire Starr? Think outside the box righties. What would you be thinking if these situations were reversed? Let's look both ways. If you are coming from the side that trump is innocent. The investigation is a nuisance. If he's guilty he has to stop this investigation. How would he behave under both scenarios. DO NOT LISTEN TO WHAT HE says. ONLY FOLLOW HIS ACTIONS.

The issue is simple. He does not want his private company dealings told to the world. It is none of anyones business. If he was charged with a crime that would be different. Just digging around because you are looking for a crime is wrong.

(07-20-2017 12:00 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  All hell breaks loose if he fires Mueller. Even the most partisan would have to raise an eye brow then. Does make you wonder though. What does this guy have to worry about? Can you imagine the uproar if Clinton mentioned to fire Starr? Think outside the box righties. What would you be thinking if these situations were reversed? Let's look both ways. If you are coming from the side that trump is innocent. The investigation is a nuisance. If he's guilty he has to stop this investigation. How would he behave under both scenarios. DO NOT LISTEN TO WHAT HE says. ONLY FOLLOW HIS ACTIONS.

#1, it is harassing not just to him, but to his family and business partners.
#2, he did business in New York City. And he did the real estate business in New York City. You can't avoid the Mob there, especially in real estate. So he has undoubtedly dealt with some shady characters.

(07-20-2017 12:00 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  All hell breaks loose if he fires Mueller. Even the most partisan would have to raise an eye brow then.

Nope. I would applaud it. One less swamp rat.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

(07-20-2017 12:07 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(07-20-2017 12:00 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  All hell breaks loose if he fires Mueller. Even the most partisan would have to raise an eye brow then.

Nope. I would applaud it. One less swamp rat.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

But you like swamp rats. You just prefer the ones you can control.

Yeah. Hood you've come out and said it would be fine even if he did collude. Could have guessed where you were at.

(07-20-2017 11:48 AM)dbackjon Wrote:  When will the Trumpies realize that the man is a traitor to the United States, and is bilking the country of tens of millions of dollars?



Probably never, which shows how ignorant the average Trump voter is.

The fact that we are currently in debt to the tune of $20 trillion is enough evidence for me to indict virtually every person who was a senator, representative and/or president since the 80s.

The fact that all of our social security taxes were never set apart from the general fund makes all of those who set up social security AND refused to fix that issue is enough for me to think of all of these politicians are traitors.

(07-20-2017 12:00 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  All hell breaks loose if he fires Mueller. Even the most partisan would have to raise an eye brow then. Does make you wonder though. What does this guy have to worry about? Can you imagine the uproar if Clinton mentioned to fire Starr? Think outside the box righties. What would you be thinking if these situations were reversed? Let's look both ways. If you are coming from the side that trump is innocent. The investigation is a nuisance. If he's guilty he has to stop this investigation. How would he behave under both scenarios. DO NOT LISTEN TO WHAT HE says. ONLY FOLLOW HIS ACTIONS.

What choice will he have when Comey and Mueller conspired to create a special investigation and---despite many obvious conflicts of interest, Mueller lacks the ethics to voluntarily recuse himself. The chief executive is the only person charged with the power to replace an unethical prosecutor. Politicizing the justice department is the first step toward tyranny and the Obama administration has us farther down that road than I ever thought possible. The behavior democrats seem to be cool with is chilling. Election fixing, selective leaking, unethical behavior, purchasing dossiers from foriegn nations, fictional controversies----wih the aid of a compliant and complicit "Fourth Estate", I'm far more concerned with the destruction of our control of government from INSiDE the country than anything a foreign power might do.

(07-20-2017 12:39 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(07-20-2017 12:00 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  All hell breaks loose if he fires Mueller. Even the most partisan would have to raise an eye brow then. Does make you wonder though. What does this guy have to worry about? Can you imagine the uproar if Clinton mentioned to fire Starr? Think outside the box righties. What would you be thinking if these situations were reversed? Let's look both ways. If you are coming from the side that trump is innocent. The investigation is a nuisance. If he's guilty he has to stop this investigation. How would he behave under both scenarios. DO NOT LISTEN TO WHAT HE says. ONLY FOLLOW HIS ACTIONS.

What choice will he have when Comey and Mueller conspired to create a special investigation and---despite many obvious conflicts of interest, Mueller lacks the ethics to voluntarily recuse himself. The chief executive is the only person charged with the power to replace an unethical prosecutor. Politicizing the justice department is the first step toward tyranny and the Obama administration has us as farther down that road than I ever thought possible. What we see the behavior democrats seem to be cool with is chilling. Election fixing, selective leaking, unethical behavior, fictional controversies----I'm more concerned with the destruction of our control of government Emirati get from INSiDE the country than anything a foreign power might do.

I have been very surprised how Chicago-like Obama made the federal government. He was worse than I realized and was a threat to the Constitution.

The Republicans will Impeached Trump in a heartbeat. They are mainly secretly waiting for the trigger to appoint Pence as President. This is more what the establishment Republicans want to do. If Trump fires Mueller? Than Trump is just as bad as Nixon.