Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
BBC article on parts of the Steele Dossier verified.
Author Message
jaredf29 Offline
Smiter of Trolls
*

Posts: 5,726
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 221
I Root For: UCF
Location: Nor Cal
Post: #31
RE: BBC article on parts of the Steele Dossier verified.
I've been a right leaning my entire life. I've either been a registered republican or a libertarian, and I'm absolutely disappointed and nonplused the levels of cognitive dissonance that republicans have displayed. Conservatives were upset at Benghazi, Clinton meeting AG, and the missing emails (all rightly so btw) ;but Russia meetings, FBI investigations, obstruction, abuses of power, violations of emoluments and the list goes on, they find excuses. I just don't understand I really don't.
07-16-2017 07:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Claw Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,786
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 296
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Orangeville HELP!
Post: #32
RE: BBC article on parts of the Steele Dossier verified.
(07-16-2017 07:58 PM)jaredf29 Wrote:  I've been a right leaning my entire life. I've either been a registered republican or a libertarian, and I'm absolutely disappointed and nonplused the levels of cognitive dissonance that republicans have displayed. Conservatives were upset at Benghazi, Clinton meeting AG, and the missing emails (all rightly so btw) ;but Russia meetings, FBI investigations, obstruction, abuses of power, violations of emoluments and the list goes on, they find excuses. I just don't understand I really don't.

Hmm...

There's no dead ambassador (Benghazi)

There's no complicit Attorney General (instead they appointed a special prosecutor themselves)

There's no destroyed evidence (emails). In fact instead of deleting emails, Junior published his.

The difference is there to see.
07-16-2017 08:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CardFan1 Offline
Red Thunderbird
*

Posts: 13,521
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 511
I Root For: Louisville ACC
Location:
Post: #33
RE: BBC article on parts of the Steele Dossier verified.
(07-16-2017 12:38 PM)Kronke Wrote:  
(07-15-2017 08:34 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It's terrible what has happened to the GOP.

[Image: BLUEAMERICA.jpg&w=1484]

03-lmfao

Russian Invasion !03-lmfao
07-16-2017 09:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jaredf29 Offline
Smiter of Trolls
*

Posts: 5,726
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 221
I Root For: UCF
Location: Nor Cal
Post: #34
RE: BBC article on parts of the Steele Dossier verified.
(07-16-2017 08:55 PM)Claw Wrote:  
(07-16-2017 07:58 PM)jaredf29 Wrote:  I've been a right leaning my entire life. I've either been a registered republican or a libertarian, and I'm absolutely disappointed and nonplused the levels of cognitive dissonance that republicans have displayed. Conservatives were upset at Benghazi, Clinton meeting AG, and the missing emails (all rightly so btw) ;but Russia meetings, FBI investigations, obstruction, abuses of power, violations of emoluments and the list goes on, they find excuses. I just don't understand I really don't.

Hmm...

There's no dead ambassador (Benghazi)

There's no complicit Attorney General (instead they appointed a special prosecutor themselves) nope just a complicit campaign chair, senior staffer, and national security adviser. Oh and and Ag that perjured himself.

There's no destroyed evidence (emails). In fact instead of deleting emails, Junior published his.

The difference is there to see.

You can't be mad at both? Yes no one has died thankfully, but they've only conspired to hijack the very thing that we tout about all the time, our identity in our democracy. Jr published the emails only after the NYT told him they were going to publish them but not before lying several times about the meeting its nature and who was involved. Let's not pretend that jr is transparent, we're all grownups here.
07-16-2017 11:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
usmbacker Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,366
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 596
I Root For: Beer
Location: Margaritaville
Post: #35
RE: BBC article on parts of the Steele Dossier verified.
Poor ole Mach will never, ever accept this fact. So his Russia posts will continue I guess.....

[Image: 33abf4y.jpg]
(This post was last modified: 07-17-2017 10:27 AM by usmbacker.)
07-17-2017 01:02 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JMUDunk Offline
Rootin' fer Dukes, bud
*

Posts: 13,944
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 438
I Root For: Freedom
Location: Shmocation
Post: #36
BBC article on parts of the Steele Dossier verified.
(07-16-2017 03:30 PM)Kronke Wrote:  
(07-16-2017 03:24 PM)shere khan Wrote:  
(07-16-2017 12:38 PM)Kronke Wrote:  
(07-15-2017 08:34 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It's terrible what has happened to the GOP.

[Image: BLUEAMERICA.jpg&w=1484]

03-lmfao
Can you even imagine what a lawless shitehole our country would be if those colors were reversed

Yup.




Very nice, the parasites have turned their new "digs" into the same burning schitholes they fled...

Holy hell, how did I miss this on FNN?!? *eye-rolley* thing.
07-17-2017 06:19 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TigerBlue4Ever Offline
Ban bans
*

Posts: 34,621
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 959
I Root For: truffles
Location: is everything
Post: #37
RE: BBC article on parts of the Steele Dossier verified.
(07-16-2017 07:58 PM)jaredf29 Wrote:  I've been a right leaning my entire life. I've either been a registered republican or a libertarian, and I'm absolutely disappointed and nonplused the levels of cognitive dissonance that republicans have displayed. Conservatives were upset at Benghazi, Clinton meeting AG, and the missing emails (all rightly so btw) ;but Russia meetings, FBI investigations, obstruction, abuses of power, violations of emoluments and the list goes on, they find excuses. I just don't understand I really don't.

Perhaps if there was some of that thar stuff they call evidence, ya know? Are you sure you lean right? Because your list looks like it was lifted off of HuffPo or the NYT or maye WashPo, talking points all.
07-17-2017 08:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jaredf29 Offline
Smiter of Trolls
*

Posts: 5,726
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 221
I Root For: UCF
Location: Nor Cal
Post: #38
RE: BBC article on parts of the Steele Dossier verified.
(07-17-2017 08:07 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  
(07-16-2017 07:58 PM)jaredf29 Wrote:  I've been a right leaning my entire life. I've either been a registered republican or a libertarian, and I'm absolutely disappointed and nonplused the levels of cognitive dissonance that republicans have displayed. Conservatives were upset at Benghazi, Clinton meeting AG, and the missing emails (all rightly so btw) ;but Russia meetings, FBI investigations, obstruction, abuses of power, violations of emoluments and the list goes on, they find excuses. I just don't understand I really don't.

Perhaps if there was some of that thar stuff they call evidence, ya know? Are you sure you lean right? Because your list looks like it was lifted off of HuffPo or the NYT or maye WashPo, talking points all.

Yes I'm on the right side of the spectrum. I'd call leaked emails, conversation transcripts, amd sworn testimony evidence. My moral compass doesn't point wherever the winning team tells me to point it.
07-17-2017 08:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Fire David Bailiff
*

Posts: 51,547
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 864
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #39
RE: BBC article on parts of the Steele Dossier verified.
(07-17-2017 08:58 AM)jaredf29 Wrote:  
(07-17-2017 08:07 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  
(07-16-2017 07:58 PM)jaredf29 Wrote:  I've been a right leaning my entire life. I've either been a registered republican or a libertarian, and I'm absolutely disappointed and nonplused the levels of cognitive dissonance that republicans have displayed. Conservatives were upset at Benghazi, Clinton meeting AG, and the missing emails (all rightly so btw) ;but Russia meetings, FBI investigations, obstruction, abuses of power, violations of emoluments and the list goes on, they find excuses. I just don't understand I really don't.
Perhaps if there was some of that thar stuff they call evidence, ya know? Are you sure you lean right? Because your list looks like it was lifted off of HuffPo or the NYT or maye WashPo, talking points all.
Yes I'm on the right side of the spectrum. I'd call leaked emails, conversation transcripts, amd sworn testimony evidence. My moral compass doesn't point wherever the winning team tells me to point it.

They are evidence of something. They are not evidence of anything criminal.
07-17-2017 09:37 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TigerBlue4Ever Offline
Ban bans
*

Posts: 34,621
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 959
I Root For: truffles
Location: is everything
Post: #40
RE: BBC article on parts of the Steele Dossier verified.
(07-17-2017 09:37 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(07-17-2017 08:58 AM)jaredf29 Wrote:  
(07-17-2017 08:07 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  
(07-16-2017 07:58 PM)jaredf29 Wrote:  I've been a right leaning my entire life. I've either been a registered republican or a libertarian, and I'm absolutely disappointed and nonplused the levels of cognitive dissonance that republicans have displayed. Conservatives were upset at Benghazi, Clinton meeting AG, and the missing emails (all rightly so btw) ;but Russia meetings, FBI investigations, obstruction, abuses of power, violations of emoluments and the list goes on, they find excuses. I just don't understand I really don't.
Perhaps if there was some of that thar stuff they call evidence, ya know? Are you sure you lean right? Because your list looks like it was lifted off of HuffPo or the NYT or maye WashPo, talking points all.
Yes I'm on the right side of the spectrum. I'd call leaked emails, conversation transcripts, amd sworn testimony evidence. My moral compass doesn't point wherever the winning team tells me to point it.

They are evidence of something. They are not evidence of anything criminal.

Exactly.
07-17-2017 09:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2017 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2017 MyBB Group.