Supreme court made their response:

Quote:Wednesday’s Supreme Court order refused to clarify the meaning of the original reinstatement, leaving Watson’s expanded definition of familial relations in place while the government’s appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pends. It did, however, stay the section of Watson’s ruling applying to refugees, meaning those refugees from the six Muslim-majority countries specified in President Trump’s Executive Order #13,780 can continue to be excluded from the United States.

So no new refugees, but immediately family members (all immediate family members) will be allowed until the full appeals process goes through on the decision.

Pretty much about what I figured would come out of the SC on this one until the full case is heard..

(07-20-2017 09:37 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Supreme court made their response:

Quote:Wednesday’s Supreme Court order refused to clarify the meaning of the original reinstatement, leaving Watson’s expanded definition of familial relations in place while the government’s appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pends. It did, however, stay the section of Watson’s ruling applying to refugees, meaning those refugees from the six Muslim-majority countries specified in President Trump’s Executive Order #13,780 can continue to be excluded from the United States.

So no new refugees, but immediately family members (all immediate family members) will be allowed until the full appeals process goes through on the decision.

Pretty much about what I figured would come out of the SC on this one until the full case is heard..

Gorsuch Alito and Thomas would have voted down the Hawaiian judge completely. If the libturds thought there was a chance in hell that Trump would nominate a moderate or a "Garland" type of justice the next time around, that is quickly fading.