(07-13-2017 05:48 AM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  

(07-12-2017 06:05 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  You guys are pathetic. It's beyond insane to defend this guy. Infowars? What a joke.

It took HRC 25 years to accumulate this type of crooked resume.

Kiddo, you are probably too young to remember her resume from 1993. It was plenty long and plenty dirty already.

(07-13-2017 05:53 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(07-13-2017 05:43 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  How was she allowed in the country with an expired Visa?

DNC ops visa.

Obama DOJ let her in under a special visa after she was initially turned down so that she could ostensibly defend a Russian company.

Link to Zerohedge which talks about the Hill story

(07-13-2017 05:56 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(07-13-2017 05:48 AM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  

(07-12-2017 06:05 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  You guys are pathetic. It's beyond insane to defend this guy. Infowars? What a joke.

It took HRC 25 years to accumulate this type of crooked resume.

Kiddo, you are probably too young to remember her resume from 1993. It was plenty long and plenty dirty already.

Gramps, that is why Corrupt Don's pace is so amazing.

So I was right...you were probably not even a zygote in 1993 but are probably an expert.

Now it seems Obama may have approved bypassing Her expired visa to enter the country. Muh Russians, can't live with Them, can't live without Them. Funny how it always comes back to the Democrats.

(07-13-2017 05:43 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  How was she allowed in the country with an expired Visa?

(07-13-2017 01:18 PM)Kronke Wrote:  How was she allowed in the country with an expired Visa?

Somebody has to pay for the Presidential Library and since Marc Rich is dead....

Nailed it!

It could have been a combination of the DNC + Never Trump wing of the GOP. She doesn't seem to LIKE Obama or the Clintons personally.

(07-13-2017 01:57 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  It could have been a combination of the DNC + Never Trump wing of the GOP. She doesn't seem to LIKE Obama or the Clintons personally.

The Clintons and Obamas are the DNC. Who cares who she LIKES? What matters is who she is WORKING for and who is PAYING her.

Your problem is that you let your hatred for Jones cloud your judgment, and take everything so literally that you assume when people are brainstorming, they're going to get absolutely everything right.

(07-13-2017 02:17 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(07-13-2017 01:57 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  It could have been a combination of the DNC + Never Trump wing of the GOP. She doesn't seem to LIKE Obama or the Clintons personally.

The Clintons and Obamas are the DNC. Who cares who she LIKES? What matters is who she is WORKING for and who is PAYING her.

Your problem is that you let your hatred for Jones cloud your judgment, and take everything so literally that you assume when people are brainstorming, they're going to get absolutely everything right.

I don't hate Jones. In fact I like a lot of what he does / says. My problem with him is that he gets really lazy sometimes and just throws **** against a wall like he did over those facebook pictures. He knows that most of his listeners will eat it up and won't bother doing their homework. Anybody can translate what she actually said about the pictures. Something that simple can be used against him to discredit everything else he has to say.

(07-13-2017 02:26 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(07-13-2017 02:17 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(07-13-2017 01:57 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  It could have been a combination of the DNC + Never Trump wing of the GOP. She doesn't seem to LIKE Obama or the Clintons personally.

The Clintons and Obamas are the DNC. Who cares who she LIKES? What matters is who she is WORKING for and who is PAYING her.

Your problem is that you let your hatred for Jones cloud your judgment, and take everything so literally that you assume when people are brainstorming, they're going to get absolutely everything right.

I don't hate Jones. In fact I like a lot of what he does / says. My problem with him is that he gets really lazy sometimes and just throws **** against a wall like he did over those facebook pictures. He knows that most of his listeners will eat it up and won't bother doing their homework. Anybody can translate what she actually said about the pictures. Something that simple can be used against him to discredit everything else he has to say.

Fair point. I've always said that if you're going to listen to Jones, you have to do so with a filter, and be able to tell what is real and what is him just ranting and raving.

Watch the Styx video, he is more level headed.

(07-13-2017 02:41 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(07-13-2017 02:26 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(07-13-2017 02:17 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(07-13-2017 01:57 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  It could have been a combination of the DNC + Never Trump wing of the GOP. She doesn't seem to LIKE Obama or the Clintons personally.

The Clintons and Obamas are the DNC. Who cares who she LIKES? What matters is who she is WORKING for and who is PAYING her.

Your problem is that you let your hatred for Jones cloud your judgment, and take everything so literally that you assume when people are brainstorming, they're going to get absolutely everything right.

I don't hate Jones. In fact I like a lot of what he does / says. My problem with him is that he gets really lazy sometimes and just throws **** against a wall like he did over those facebook pictures. He knows that most of his listeners will eat it up and won't bother doing their homework. Anybody can translate what she actually said about the pictures. Something that simple can be used against him to discredit everything else he has to say.

Fair point. I've always said that if you're going to listen to Jones, you have to do so with a filter, and be able to tell what is real and what is him just ranting and raving.

Watch the Styx video, he is more level headed.

Whenever possible I always go to the original source of data or quotes before I believe anything.

(07-13-2017 05:43 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  How was she allowed in the country with an expired Visa?

This has probably been answered, but apparently a "provisional" or Temp VISA issued by Tarmac Loretta.

(07-13-2017 01:57 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  It could have been a combination of the DNC + Never Trump wing of the GOP. She doesn't seem to LIKE Obama or the Clintons personally.

Or if she's thorough, the simplest "cover" in the world would be to bang out a bunch of Anti- Whomever rants on something like Facebook.

Saps like Kaine can then point and say "lookey there, she said she hates the Clintons and wants Trump to win!".

Just spitballin' here.

(07-13-2017 04:02 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(07-13-2017 01:57 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  It could have been a combination of the DNC + Never Trump wing of the GOP. She doesn't seem to LIKE Obama or the Clintons personally.

Or if she's thorough, the simplest "cover" in the world would be to bang out a bunch of Anti- Whomever rants on something like Facebook.

Saps like Kaine can then point and say "lookey there, she said she hates the Clintons and wants Trump to win!".

Just spitballin' here.

Except it doesnt matter. The investigation has the enitre email string.

The bottom line is only one candidate APPROACHED a foreign government seeking oppo-research. Basically, what I see is that US elections are kind of a dirty business. I suspect pretty much everyone knows that---but its one thing to know it and another to actually see it. Right now, to the extend this Russian narrative degrades Trumps ability to get things done the Dems will continue to push it. When people dont have insurance after all the insurers pull out of certain states, those state congressional bodies wont be able to avoid the Obamacare disaster any longer. Obstruction for obstruction's sake wont sell at that point.

(07-12-2017 03:13 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  LOL info wars...

Which, these days, has infinitely more credibility that FNN and WashPo.

(07-15-2017 11:53 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(07-12-2017 03:13 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  LOL info wars...

Which, these days, has infinitely more credibility that FNN and WashPo.

Says the brainwashed Republicans. You do know the majority of fake news originates from sites like those. They don't retract, or apologize. They just keep pushing bogus conspiracies.