(07-11-2017 08:32 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  Lena Dunham is a miserable fat ****.

I coyote banged one just like her my frosh year during a day long binger.....she never saw my arse again either....

(07-07-2017 07:51 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

What a fat, ugly, heartless liberal b#tch.

Quote:The no-kill shelter from which Lena Dunham adopted Lamby — the dog she recently gave away after what she described as “four years of challenging behavior and aggression” — isn’t buying her story.

On June 21, the Girls alum shared on Instagram her “heartbreaking” decision to give away Lamby to an “amazing professional facility” in L.A. to be cared for by someone “educated in a rescue dog’s specific trauma.” Dunham noted that “Lamby suffered terrible abuse as a pup,” which “made having him in a typical home environment dangerous to him and others” and she and boyfriend musician Jack Antonoff “needed to be responsible to ourselves, our neighbors and especially our beloved boy.” They also needed to save their home, as the dog “ruined floors and couches and our life.”

https://www.yahoo.com/celebrity/animal-s...15227.html

Why is this even a thread here...who the eff cares? Seems to me that someone is actually suffering from a guilty pleasure crush on Ms. Dunham.

(07-10-2017 09:59 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(07-07-2017 09:27 PM)john01992 Wrote:  And again. Why is this newsworthy?

Let's see...
A. She openly admitted in her book that she sexually assaulted her little sister when they were growing up in her autobiography.
B. She lied about being sexually assaulted by a "conservative Republican" while she was in college.
C. She said (basically) that she would be honored to have an abortion.
D. She played the victim card when she was ignored by Odell Beckham, Jr. even though she was on her phone. (This was mentioned earlier in the thread.)
E. See OP.

In other words, Lena Dunham has proven herself to be a colossal hypocrite time and again. Why do you keep defending her? Oh, yeah. Because she's a fellow liberal.

Y'know, John, sometimes it's better to just distance yourself from the loonies on your side. Please distance yourself from her.

Dude, she's an actress that none of us know or have ever met, much less endorsed as any voice for anything we stand for. The attempt to paint this as some negative to liberal posters here is idiotic at best. Move along guys.

"Um..........like............the dog needed............things. Like food, water, and attention. It was so much............um............like......effort."

(07-11-2017 11:48 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  "Um..........like............the dog needed............things. Like food, water, and attention. It was so much............um............like......effort."

Have you ever cared for a dog with severe traumatic issues due to prior abuse?

(07-11-2017 11:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:48 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  "Um..........like............the dog needed............things. Like food, water, and attention. It was so much............um............like......effort."

Have you ever cared for a dog with severe traumatic issues due to prior abuse?

Yes.

(07-11-2017 11:59 AM)GeorgeBorkFan Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:48 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  "Um..........like............the dog needed............things. Like food, water, and attention. It was so much............um............like......effort."

Have you ever cared for a dog with severe traumatic issues due to prior abuse?

Yes.

Congratulations, but I was asking the other guy with the snarky ass comment.

(07-11-2017 11:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:48 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  "Um..........like............the dog needed............things. Like food, water, and attention. It was so much............um............like......effort."

Have you ever cared for a dog with severe traumatic issues due to prior abuse?

No, but I briefly dated a girl after Stinkfist was done with her, until she went to prison. She was pretty skilled but seemed to me a little too fond of playing with knives. I think her name was Lorena.

(07-11-2017 11:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:48 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  "Um..........like............the dog needed............things. Like food, water, and attention. It was so much............um............like......effort."

Have you ever cared for a dog with severe traumatic issues due to prior abuse?

Yes, if you must know. We usually got rescue dogs when I was younger and most had something wrong with them. Perhaps Miss Dunham should have done some research and got herself a dog without traumatic issues? Plenty of those need homes too.

(07-11-2017 01:33 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:48 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  "Um..........like............the dog needed............things. Like food, water, and attention. It was so much............um............like......effort."

Have you ever cared for a dog with severe traumatic issues due to prior abuse?

Yes, if you must know. We usually got rescue dogs when I was younger and most had something wrong with them. Perhaps Miss Dunham should have done some research and got herself a dog without traumatic issues? Plenty of those need homes too.

Sure...and it's also entirely possible that neither she nor the agency she got the dog from new the extent of the issues with the dog at the time of adoption.

Bottom line is what's in the best interest of the dog..and that appears to be with a professional.

To turn this into some attack on the left or Hollywood or Dunham is lame.

I've had a rescue dog for nearly 5 years now and we're still seeing new behaviors with her that appear to be the result of her abuse as a puppy.

(07-11-2017 09:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-10-2017 09:59 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(07-07-2017 09:27 PM)john01992 Wrote:  And again. Why is this newsworthy?

Let's see...
A. She openly admitted in her book that she sexually assaulted her little sister when they were growing up in her autobiography.
B. She lied about being sexually assaulted by a "conservative Republican" while she was in college.
C. She said (basically) that she would be honored to have an abortion.
D. She played the victim card when she was ignored by Odell Beckham, Jr. even though she was on her phone. (This was mentioned earlier in the thread.)
E. See OP.

In other words, Lena Dunham has proven herself to be a colossal hypocrite time and again. Why do you keep defending her? Oh, yeah. Because she's a fellow liberal.

Y'know, John, sometimes it's better to just distance yourself from the loonies on your side. Please distance yourself from her.

Dude, she's an actress that none of us know or have ever met, much less endorsed as any voice for anything we stand for. The attempt to paint this as some negative to liberal posters here is idiotic at best. Move along guys.

Let's see. She's pro-choice, which most of y'all on the left are as well. Y'all treat any accusation of rape or sexual assault as serious even if it's proven false (see Duke Lacrosse Scandal), yet dismiss it when it's a fellow liberal. (See Clinton, William J.) So my painting her as a typical leftist isn't idiotic.

(07-11-2017 02:39 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 09:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-10-2017 09:59 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(07-07-2017 09:27 PM)john01992 Wrote:  And again. Why is this newsworthy?

Let's see...
A. She openly admitted in her book that she sexually assaulted her little sister when they were growing up in her autobiography.
B. She lied about being sexually assaulted by a "conservative Republican" while she was in college.
C. She said (basically) that she would be honored to have an abortion.
D. She played the victim card when she was ignored by Odell Beckham, Jr. even though she was on her phone. (This was mentioned earlier in the thread.)
E. See OP.

In other words, Lena Dunham has proven herself to be a colossal hypocrite time and again. Why do you keep defending her? Oh, yeah. Because she's a fellow liberal.

Y'know, John, sometimes it's better to just distance yourself from the loonies on your side. Please distance yourself from her.

Dude, she's an actress that none of us know or have ever met, much less endorsed as any voice for anything we stand for. The attempt to paint this as some negative to liberal posters here is idiotic at best. Move along guys.

Let's see. She's pro-choice, which most of y'all on the left are as well. Y'all treat any accusation of rape or sexual assault as serious even if it's proven false (see Duke Lacrosse Scandal), yet dismiss it when it's a fellow liberal. (See Clinton, William J.) So my painting her as a typical leftist isn't idiotic.

That's ridiculous. I didn't give thought one to that Duke lacrosse scandal. Stop generalizing. And I don't know anyone that dismissed Clinton's behavior. It was appalling. Try again.

My point was that just because we may share some ideals with someone doesn't mean that everything they do speaks for me/us. Understand?

I am not wishing to defend Lena Dunham. I am trying to understand what benefit the shelter is getting by publically shaming her.

"Hey! Come rescue a pet! If you can't properly care for the adopted pet, we, the shelter, will publically shame you!"

Public response- No, we will not adopt your pets.

Lena Dunham Sells Dress She Cried in When Clinton Lost Election



One deranged person. Got to raise as much money as she can so more babies can be murdered.
The dog got off easy.

Quote:Lena Dunham is selling the dress she cried in when Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 presidential election to President Donald Trump, with proceeds going to Planned Parenthood.

Online luxury consignment store the RealReal is selling Dunham’s “Zenzo ruffle-accented printed dress” for $125.00. The dress comes with a personal note from the “Girls” creator and 70 percent of the proceeds from the sale will go to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the Hill reported.

Dunham is selling 196 pieces of clothing from her closet online.

Keep reading here...

Yet another perspective of the Dunham faux-capade despite many of the lib posters saying it is a non-story or not a big deal.

Quote:What I’m leading up to is this: Lena Dunham dumped her own dog, blamed the dog, may have lied about the dog’s history, was called on it, then claimed she was the victim of the whole affair and begged people not to apply “scrutiny” to a story she had published to 3 million Instagram followers.

Dunham adopted the pooch, Lamby, in 2013 and proceeded lovingly to extract writing material from the animal, offering the world a nearly 4,000-word New Yorker piece that made her look like — this was very on-brand for her — a clumsy but soulful, loving, and ultimately endearing dog owner. In trademark fashion, she freely admitted one reason she was moved to get a pooch: “I’d be permanently rid of the whiff of self-involvement. (‘She can’t be that much of a narcissist — she adopted a dog!’)” She also claimed the dog had had three previous owners, which is two more than the animal shelter said. She went on to deploy the mutt as an adorable prop at photo shoots and red carpets. Who doesn’t love a person who loves a dog?

Just as Girls was wrapping up its HBO run, though, Dunham unloaded the animal on Zen Dog, a Los Angeles home for troubled canines, claiming that her ex-pet had been a little monster beset by “aggression” and “particular issues, which remain myriad,” adding that Lamby “ruined floors and couches and our life.” Yet one of her chief takeaways from L’Affaire Lamby was, naturally, the importance of “forgiving myself.”

Robert Vazquez, a spokesman for the place where Dunham purchased the animal, BARC, a Brooklyn shelter for hipster dogs who are down on their luck, did not buy much of this. In an e-mail to Yahoo Celebrity, he disputed her claims that Lamby had had three previous owners, that he’d been abused, and that he had behavioral problems when she adopted him:

"We checked the records for Lamby. He was 'owner surrendered, not enough time,' so we do not know where she got 'multiple owners that abused the dog.' . . . When she adopted the dog from us, it wasn’t crazy. . . . It’s just hard to believe the dog was nasty when she took Lamby to every green room with her when Girls was still a thing 4 years ago. Vazquez added that BARC’s adoption agreements require owners who want to part company with dogs adopted from the shelter to return them there rather than shunting them off on a third party."

Dunham fired back on Instagram with another post in which she asked, “Why should this story be subject to scrutiny and anger?” In other words: People mustn’t quibble with her version of reality, and anyone who does so is angry, which is a favorite Millennial method for sliming your detractors as not-nice. Very much like Hannah Horvath, she added that she was the real victim here: “I hope those judging can imagine the incredible pain of letting go of your favorite creature on EARTH because you know you can’t help them be healthy and happy.” She also suggested that those drawing attention to her evident disregard for the truth were themselves suffering from some sort of psychological malady: “I know I’m a lot of fun to place your issues on, but I won’t let anyone hang their hat on this peg.”

Dunham complains, not without some justification, that her every public act seems to cause a tiny furor. “I have weathered a lot of micro-scandals,” she noted on Instagram, “but this one hurts MOST.” (More than being criticized for smearing a fellow former Oberlin student as a rapist? Do tell.) But Dunham evokes a lot of commentary from the public in part because she invites it by so relentlessly publicizing every detail of her life — who else blurts out 4,000 words for The New Yorker about her relationship with a dog?

Narcissistic Victim Disorder

Here is the "lovely and talented" Ms. Dunham in a toilet selfie:

(07-11-2017 02:57 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Lena Dunham Sells Dress She Cried in When Clinton Lost Election



One deranged person. Go to raise as much money as she can so more babies can be murdered.
The dog got off easy.

Quote:Lena Dunham is selling the dress she cried in when Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 presidential election to President Donald Trump, with proceeds going to Planned Parenthood.

Online luxury consignment store the RealReal is selling Dunham’s “Zenzo ruffle-accented printed dress” for $125.00. The dress comes with a personal note from the “Girls” creator and 70 percent of the proceeds from the sale will go to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the Hill reported.

Dunham is selling 196 pieces of clothing from her closet online.

Keep reading here...

I guess someone else could make a tent out of it.

(07-11-2017 12:02 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:59 AM)GeorgeBorkFan Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:48 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  "Um..........like............the dog needed............things. Like food, water, and attention. It was so much............um............like......effort."

Have you ever cared for a dog with severe traumatic issues due to prior abuse?

Yes.

Congratulations, but I was asking the other guy with the snarky ass comment.

I didn't realize this was a person to person discussion solely. I must have accidentally broken into your PMs.

(07-11-2017 01:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 01:33 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:48 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  "Um..........like............the dog needed............things. Like food, water, and attention. It was so much............um............like......effort."

Have you ever cared for a dog with severe traumatic issues due to prior abuse?

Yes, if you must know. We usually got rescue dogs when I was younger and most had something wrong with them. Perhaps Miss Dunham should have done some research and got herself a dog without traumatic issues? Plenty of those need homes too.

Sure...and it's also entirely possible that neither she nor the agency she got the dog from new the extent of the issues with the dog at the time of adoption.

Bottom line is what's in the best interest of the dog..and that appears to be with a professional.

To turn this into some attack on the left or Hollywood or Dunham is lame.

I've had a rescue dog for nearly 5 years now and we're still seeing new behaviors with her that appear to be the result of her abuse as a puppy.

Her adoption contract obligated her to return the dog to the shelter. She didn't do that. That is a legally binding agreement.

Her assessment of the dog and situation, ie her credibility, is the issue. She's a demonstrated liar and creep.

She's the one who puts every bit of her life out for public consumption. With that comes criticism for her absurd behavior.

(07-11-2017 03:32 PM)GeorgeBorkFan Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 12:02 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:59 AM)GeorgeBorkFan Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:48 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  "Um..........like............the dog needed............things. Like food, water, and attention. It was so much............um............like......effort."

Have you ever cared for a dog with severe traumatic issues due to prior abuse?

Yes.

Congratulations, but I was asking the other guy with the snarky ass comment.

I didn't realize this was a person to person discussion solely. I must have accidentally broken into your PMs.

+3

(07-11-2017 03:32 PM)GeorgeBorkFan Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 12:02 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:59 AM)GeorgeBorkFan Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-11-2017 11:48 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  "Um..........like............the dog needed............things. Like food, water, and attention. It was so much............um............like......effort."

Have you ever cared for a dog with severe traumatic issues due to prior abuse?

Yes.

Congratulations, but I was asking the other guy with the snarky ass comment.

I didn't realize this was a person to person discussion solely. I must have accidentally broken into your PMs.