https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...er-supply/

This isn't worth it. Sometimes you need red tape. Unlike the Paris agreement, this actually could hurt rural Americans.

(06-28-2017 04:36 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...er-supply/

Quote: that could pollute many Americans’ drinking water sources.

Aaaaaand of course, could not.

A roll back of a rule signed in June of '15. So we'll all have to suffer through the dirty water we all had in May of '15...

My goodness the desperation is desperate.

My guess is Putin told him to roll it back

May. But probably won't.

(06-28-2017 04:42 PM)oliveandblue Wrote:  This isn't worth it. Sometimes you need red tape. Unlike the Paris agreement, this actually could hurt rural Americans.

Hard to say. I think it's arguable that one of the intentions of this Rule is to codify EPA's ability to restrict development.

(06-28-2017 04:36 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...er-supply/

How could we live with the Drinking water we had way back in 2015... It's inhuman I tell you...

They should focus on those areas where there is a known problem. Like the copious amounts of lead in the water where JuannyNada grew up.

Hundreds of thousands will die..... oh wait, that's the talking point for the Republicans' health care plan. Nevermind.

This was about giving power to the EPA to harass and tell people what they could/couldn't do on their own property if the rain left a puddle.

Nothing to do with clean water.

(06-28-2017 04:36 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...er-supply/

One of the best things he's done. Puddles on farms are no longer considered "wetlands."

One of the most egregious overreaches in government history has been repealed.

(06-28-2017 04:47 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(06-28-2017 04:36 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...er-supply/

Quote: that could pollute many Americans’ drinking water sources.

Aaaaaand of course, could not.

A roll back of a rule signed in June of '15. So we'll all have to suffer through the dirty water we all had in May of '15...

My goodness the desperation is desperate.

My guess is Putin told him to roll it back

The over the top "the rebublicans want dirty air, dirty water, and have a desire to push grandma over a cliff" is among the most intellectually dishonest tactics the Dems use. That party relies on their voters being complete morons. Its scary that nearly half the nation actually buys that garbage.

(06-28-2017 05:40 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-28-2017 04:47 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(06-28-2017 04:36 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...er-supply/

Quote: that could pollute many Americans’ drinking water sources.

Aaaaaand of course, could not.

A roll back of a rule signed in June of '15. So we'll all have to suffer through the dirty water we all had in May of '15...

My goodness the desperation is desperate.

My guess is Putin told him to roll it back

The over the top "the rebublicans want dirty air, dirty water, and have a desire to push grandma over a cliff" is among the most intellectually dishonest tactics the Dems use. That party relies on their voters being complete morons. Its scary that nearly half the nation actually buys that garbage.

Its the mental illness that is so prevalent on the left that is really scary. I had no idea so many people were so unstable. Stupid isn't necessarily dangerous. Deranged is dangerous.

This is idiotic.

This still makes me laugh and illustrates how we got here

http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/i...chiga.html

I call fabrics.

The urbanites are just concerned about the rural folks' well being. Lol

That rule was idiotic. Somehow I think everyone will survive just fine.

(06-28-2017 04:36 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...er-supply/

News flash, Trump didn't collude with the Russians so you might want to take that ridiculous assertion out of your sig. Even your boys at CNN have finally backed the eff off that BS story.

(06-28-2017 04:49 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  May. But probably won't.

They used "can" and "may" in almost every statement. I never once saw "will". I reckon that before Lord Zero issued his EO millions of Americans were drinking dirty water. I can't help but wonder why there was no CNN coverage of that.

(06-28-2017 05:33 PM)Paul M Wrote:  This was about giving power to the EPA to harass and tell people what they could/couldn't do on their own property if the rain left a puddle.

Nothing to do with clean water.

Yup.

3

So Mr. Trump is going to kill us all by removing a rule. So, tell me about the rule. Quoting the article:

The 2015 rule never really went into effect, however, because a federal court stopped its implementation until judges decide a lawsuit against it, which is still in progress.

So Trump has rolled back something that has never been implemented and was stopped (enjoined by the courts) before his watch.