"If it was something really good, it would leak."

(06-27-2017 08:55 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 07:44 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 07:37 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 07:29 AM)john01992 Wrote:  Lol here we go again. The conservative fools rallying around a proven liar with the worst possible track record.
Conservatives are the epitome of "do as I say...not as I do."

How does O'Keefe's record affect the words that came out of the CNN guy's mouth?

He has misrepresented people in videos countless times. It's very easy to edit video to misrepresent people.

How the **** do you misrepresent a simple question and answer?

Quote:PV: Honestly you think the who Russia **** is just like bull****?
CNN: Could be bull****. I mean it's mostly bull**** now. Like we don't have any giant proof.

CNN: I think the president is probably right to say "you are witch hunting me."

Really john?

the mental gymnastics man!

(06-27-2017 07:44 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 07:37 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 07:29 AM)john01992 Wrote:  Lol here we go again. The conservative fools rallying around a proven liar with the worst possible track record.
Conservatives are the epitome of "do as I say...not as I do."

How does O'Keefe's record affect the words that came out of the CNN guy's mouth?

He has misrepresented people in videos countless times. It's very easy to edit video to misrepresent people.

How could that have been done here?

(06-27-2017 09:29 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 07:44 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 07:37 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 07:29 AM)john01992 Wrote:  Lol here we go again. The conservative fools rallying around a proven liar with the worst possible track record.
Conservatives are the epitome of "do as I say...not as I do."

How does O'Keefe's record affect the words that came out of the CNN guy's mouth?

He has misrepresented people in videos countless times. It's very easy to edit video to misrepresent people.

How could that have been done here?

same way it was done it in the past. take things completely out of context. edit video to misrepresent comments. and worst of all: most of the time his videos despite being edited still don't even "prove" his point. I recall one of his last videos not even showing the main issue and instead "proved" it with a black screen/text of "then he did x" or in this case yall decide to selectively interpret something in a way that was clearly the wrong interpretation. and yet his followers which are all partisan hacks eat it up regardless. okeefe can edit a video of saying sky is blue to say "jim says the sky is red" and narrate the video to "jim says the sky is green" and kronke would believe jim said the sky is green.

How can you take that out of context? It's a question followed by an answer.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Anybody else notice that there is a real war between the various media outlets that's mostly about who trusts who and who who is?

It's ridiculous.

And this is yet another confirmation of why Juan has zero credibility on this board.

(06-27-2017 09:11 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  

at least CNN retracts and holds their people accountable.

Both Bill O'Reilly and Brian Williams got caught doing basically the exact same thing. NBC kicked Williams to the curb and FNC stood by Bill O'Reilly.

remember that seth rich story FNC completely butchered? you know the one where their own f***ing source said was wrong, their own f***ing employees said was wrong, and the one that they themselves had to retract (so no you can't deny this didn't happen). remind me as to how many FNC employees were let go over that?

(06-27-2017 10:17 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 09:11 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  

at least CNN retracts and holds their people accountable.

Both Bill O'Reilly and Brian Williams got caught doing basically the exact same thing. NBC kicked Williams to the curb and FNC stood by Bill O'Reilly.

remember that seth rich story FNC completely butchered? you know the one where their own f***ing source said was wrong, their own f***ing employees said was wrong, and the one that they themselves had to retract (so no you can't deny this didn't happen). remind me as to how many FNC employees were let go over that?

I thought the employees from cnn quit, not get fired...

(06-27-2017 10:11 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  How can you take that out of context? It's a question followed by an answer.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

it's very easy to edit footage. especially undercover POV where you can easily add audio to change the question the interviewer was asking.

(06-27-2017 10:20 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 10:17 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 09:11 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  

at least CNN retracts and holds their people accountable.

Both Bill O'Reilly and Brian Williams got caught doing basically the exact same thing. NBC kicked Williams to the curb and FNC stood by Bill O'Reilly.

remember that seth rich story FNC completely butchered? you know the one where their own f***ing source said was wrong, their own f***ing employees said was wrong, and the one that they themselves had to retract (so no you can't deny this didn't happen). remind me as to how many FNC employees were let go over that?

I thought the employees from cnn quit, not get fired...

did you know the word gullible is not in the dictionary?

(06-27-2017 10:22 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 10:20 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 10:17 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 09:11 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  

at least CNN retracts and holds their people accountable.

Both Bill O'Reilly and Brian Williams got caught doing basically the exact same thing. NBC kicked Williams to the curb and FNC stood by Bill O'Reilly.

remember that seth rich story FNC completely butchered? you know the one where their own f***ing source said was wrong, their own f***ing employees said was wrong, and the one that they themselves had to retract (so no you can't deny this didn't happen). remind me as to how many FNC employees were let go over that?

I thought the employees from cnn quit, not get fired...

did you know the word gullible is not in the dictionary?

thats a lot of substance right there in that post....

(06-27-2017 10:22 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 10:20 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 10:17 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(06-27-2017 09:11 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  

at least CNN retracts and holds their people accountable.

Both Bill O'Reilly and Brian Williams got caught doing basically the exact same thing. NBC kicked Williams to the curb and FNC stood by Bill O'Reilly.

remember that seth rich story FNC completely butchered? you know the one where their own f***ing source said was wrong, their own f***ing employees said was wrong, and the one that they themselves had to retract (so no you can't deny this didn't happen). remind me as to how many FNC employees were let go over that?

I thought the employees from cnn quit, not get fired...

did you know the word gullible is not in the dictionary?

"at least"???

You acheived the lifetime 'see line 4 in sig' acheivement award with that 'opener'...

Thank you for posting!

A lib's world lately..

One of their own attempts to murder multiple Republican Congressman.
He does unfortunately succeed in severely wounding Rep. Scalise.
A Dem party official comes out wishes Rep Scalise would die.
Dems spend 30 million to buy an election in Georgia and lose.
Dems are 0-5 in elections since Trump's election.
Their Russia collusion fairy tale has blown up in their face.
Their trusted source of news has officially been exposed as fake news.
Three of their media propagandists are forced to quit over fake news story.
Their favorite socialist Senator and wife are being investigated for fraud.
The former AG under Barry is in danger of being proven to have obstructed Clinton email investigation.
Obama being criticized for knowing about Russian hacking and did nothing about it.

Others feel free to add what I missed.

(06-27-2017 10:05 AM)john01992 Wrote:  take things completely out of context.

Did you watch the video? Several of the comments stood on there own. No context was necessary. Examples:

Quote: “I haven’t seen any good enough evidence to show that the President committed a crime.”

Quote: “I think the President is probably right to say, like, look you are witch hunting me...you have no real proof.”

Quote:“it’s mostly bull**** right now. Like, we don’t have any giant proof...if it was something really good, it’d leak.”

So rack your brain, and come up with some questions that would add "context" sufficient to change the point.

Has fake news CNN disavowed? Or do they endorse Bonifield, who thinks journalistic integrity is "adorable"?

(06-27-2017 11:02 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  A lib's world lately..

One of their own attempts to murder multiple Republican Congressman.
He does unfortunately succeed in severely wounding Rep. Scalise.
A Dem party official comes out wishes Rep Scalise would die.
Dems spend 30 million to buy an election in Georgia and lose.
Dems are 0-5 in elections since Trump's election.
Their Russia collusion fairy tale has blown up in their face.
Their trusted source of news has officially been exposed as fake news.
Three of their media propagandists are forced to quit over fake news story.
Their favorite socialist Senator and wife are being investigated for fraud.
The former AG under Barry is in danger of being proven to have obstructed Clinton email investigation.
Obama being criticized for knowing about Russian hacking and did nothing about it.

Others feel free to add what I missed.

Live look into doe-eyed cuck Brian Stelter's office: