(06-24-2017 11:49 PM)NIU007 Wrote: If NIU was getting money from the state then tuition wouldn't need to be as much for NIU to at least break even. How is that hard to understand? I personally know people who went out of state because it was freaking cheaper. That never used to happen. It was always more expensive going out of state. It has exactly ZERO to do with the master plan or sports in general. And smaller enrollment would affect attendance PLUS the lack of budget means we don't want to spend a whole bunch on sports, even from private donations, when the whole university is undergoing money shortages. Not too hard to understand.
Perhaps you didn't notice, but the cost of going to college has been on a constant rise, so don't make it sound like if there was a budget, tuition would be affordable. At best, it may not have risen as much as it has.
Your statement makes it sound like the main reason the people you knew who went out of state did so strictly because it was cheaper. So was that attending an out of state Division I school over the same in Illinois, or was it trading a D-II for a D-I, D-II, or D-III in Illinois.
Exactly what percentage of those "students lost" in the enrollment decline can you guarantee would have attended Huskie athletic events? Again, if you hadn't noticed, student attendance at all levels of college athletics is down -- today's students choose to spend more time playing video games, incessantly glued to their cell phones, drinking/smoking/snorting/hooking up than they do being involved in campus activities. It's ridiculous to attribute the decline in student attendance strictly on a lower enrollment.
So it surprises you that under this economy when the entire university is undergoing money shortages that there are those who argue athletics isn't the main mission of education and therefore less should be spent on athletics? It surprises you that under this economy donations are down? But various charities, community programs, etc. are less affected than athletics.
As stated before, save these posts and explain again how soon --- one year, three, eight, 14, etc. --- after a budget finally gets adopted that all these problems will decrease notably.
Yes, it is hard to understand why simply having a budget passed is going to be our salvation.
Sorry, but I've known nothing but budget cuts for decades now and somehow we had to continue operating and yet expectations never diminished.