(06-16-2017 01:15 AM)Kronke Wrote: You can't use the "generosity" of Obamacare as a measuring stick, as it is in a death spiral. It's like me saying my plan is that everything is free, and it will be bankrupt in a year, but you can't repeal it, because then people will have to pay more out of pocket and be worse off. Nonsense.
Exactly.
Obamacare is based upon the false premise that health insurance = health care, and relies on two assumptions that defy every known law of economics:
1) It expects young, healthy people to overpay for health insurance so that older, sicker people can underpay, and
2) It expects to be able to control costs by paying providers less and requiring more work from them, without reducing the number and quality of people who want to provide health care.
Those chickens are coming home to roost, and it's not pretty.
Bottom line: You are not going to provide universal care without injecting a significant amount of tax dollars. So your choices are:
1) Massive tax increase, or
2) Massive spending cuts somewhere, or
3) No universal care.
Pick your poison.
I choose Bismarck health care funded by a combination of eliminating Medicaid (redundant), reducing Medicare to a supplement to Bismarck, replacing the current welfare hodgepodge with a guaranteed minimum income along the lines of Milton Friedman's negative income tax or the Boortz-Linder prebate/prefund, and imposing a consumption tax (which would also allow balancing the budget and reducing other taxes). What say you?
And no, let's cut the military to fund health care doesn't work. We could eliminate the military entirely, and that wouldn't free up enough to pay for universal health care.