Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
When Little Ricky is let Go
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
BeerCat Offline
Terminally Chill
*

Posts: 7,517
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 88
I Root For: Who's playin uk
Location: The Drunken Clam
Post: #11
RE: When Little Ricky is let Go
(06-15-2017 02:16 PM)ThinkBigPine Wrote:  If they have to vacate wins - like the 2012 BE Tournament Championship, does that mean we get it? or does it just vacate and no one is the winner?

It would mean whatever you want it to mean because it's a BS non punishment punishment where we all pretend that the games didn't happen.
 
06-15-2017 04:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MercerCo_BearCat Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 410
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation: 7
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #12
RE: When Little Ricky is let Go
(06-15-2017 04:50 PM)BeerCat Wrote:  
(06-15-2017 02:16 PM)ThinkBigPine Wrote:  If they have to vacate wins - like the 2012 BE Tournament Championship, does that mean we get it? or does it just vacate and no one is the winner?

It would mean whatever you want it to mean because it's a BS non punishment punishment where we all pretend that the games didn't happen.

Still considered a loss in our books, but it's more like we forfeited against no body. Jerks.
 
06-15-2017 05:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rtaylor Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,278
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 106
I Root For: Bearcats
Location:
Post: #13
RE: When Little Ricky is let Go
Garbage University, garbage athletic department. Ramsey, Jurich, Pitino, Petrino, all scum bags. They are all up in arms over the severity of said penalties. What a joke. UL is a national punchline. I hope their fans and graduates are happy.
 
06-15-2017 09:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
zdiddy513 Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 219
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 1
I Root For: Cincy
Location:
Post: #14
RE: When Little Ricky is let Go
To be fair they had a self-imposed postseason ban for this incident. Without that the NCAA could have issued a ban and perhaps for more than 1 year. So I don't think they really got off scotch-free as some might like to think.
 
06-15-2017 09:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Billy_Bearcat Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,779
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 87
I Root For: UC Bearcats
Location:

Donators
Post: #15
RE: When Little Ricky is let Go
(06-15-2017 09:52 PM)zdiddy513 Wrote:  To be fair they had a self-imposed postseason ban for this incident. Without that the NCAA could have issued a ban and perhaps for more than 1 year. So I don't think they really got off scotch-free as some might like to think.

[Image: giphy-facebook_s.jpg?t=1]
 
06-15-2017 10:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BcatMatt13 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,325
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation: 67
I Root For: The Bearcats
Location:
Post: #16
RE: When Little Ricky is let Go
(06-15-2017 09:52 PM)zdiddy513 Wrote:  To be fair they had a self-imposed postseason ban for this incident. Without that the NCAA could have issued a ban and perhaps for more than 1 year. So I don't think they really got off scotch-free as some might like to think.

Self-imposed bans are awful. The players at the time get penalized that had nothing to do with the violations. What they should do is not accept self-imposed bans for the current year, and accept them for the following year while allowing any player who wishes to transfer to do so without restriction.

The way the recent seniors at Louisville, Syracuse, etc. have been treated in regards to the self-imposed ban halfway-or-more through the season is disgraceful.
 
(This post was last modified: 06-15-2017 11:08 PM by BcatMatt13.)
06-15-2017 10:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Lush Offline
que la fĂȘte continue
*

Posts: 11,961
Joined: May 2004
Reputation: 168
I Root For: bail bondsmen
Location: sovereign ludditia
Post: #17
RE: When Little Ricky is let Go
what's wrong with what louisville did?
 
06-15-2017 10:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Lush Offline
que la fĂȘte continue
*

Posts: 11,961
Joined: May 2004
Reputation: 168
I Root For: bail bondsmen
Location: sovereign ludditia
Post: #18
RE: When Little Ricky is let Go
(06-15-2017 12:45 PM)BearcatJerry Wrote:  
(06-15-2017 12:33 PM)KCat Wrote:  https://sports.yahoo.com/ncaa-announce-r...53105.html


Will Mick or Mac replace him?????

They are not firing Pitino. Seriously.

I have said this elsewhere, but UL fans LOVE this type of thing. In their own minds, they exult over being the "bad boy" program of the NCAA and I think it makes them feel like success when their coaches and/or players are involved in scandals. (As in "If you're not cheating, you're not trying hard enough." Therefore, this is proof positive of their coaches doing a bang-up (poor choice of metaphor??? I think not!) job.)

And when Pitino does eventually retire, I would be willing to bet they are not going to poach Mick. Why? Because (a) they consider UC "below" their stature and so they're more likely to go somewhere else, and (b) because Mick runs a clean program and they, as I said elsewhere, don't want a "clean" program. The last time they brought in a "clean" guy to clean up a major program was when they replaced Bobby Petrino with Steve Kragthorpe... Then they got really mad when Krags (who was an incompetent boob, FWIW) ran off all Bobby P's "talent." They won't go that route again.

are you a, sport fan psychologist?
 
(This post was last modified: 06-15-2017 10:55 PM by Lush.)
06-15-2017 10:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rtaylor Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,278
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 106
I Root For: Bearcats
Location:
Post: #19
RE: When Little Ricky is let Go
(06-15-2017 09:52 PM)zdiddy513 Wrote:  To be fair they had a self-imposed postseason ban for this incident. Without that the NCAA could have issued a ban and perhaps for more than 1 year. So I don't think they really got off scotch-free as some might like to think.

scotch? 03-lmfao
 
06-15-2017 10:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rtaylor Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,278
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 106
I Root For: Bearcats
Location:
Post: #20
RE: When Little Ricky is let Go
(06-15-2017 10:39 PM)BcatMatt13 Wrote:  
(06-15-2017 09:52 PM)zdiddy513 Wrote:  To be fair they had a self-imposed postseason ban for this incident. Without that the NCAA could have issued a ban and perhaps for more than 1 year. So I don't think they really got off scotch-free as some might like to think.

Self-imposed bans are awful. The players at the time get penalized that had nothing to do with the violations. What they should do is not accept self-imposed bans for the current year, and accept them for the following year while allowing any player who wishes to transfer without restriction.

The way the recent seniors at Louisville, Syracuse, etc. have been treated in regards to the self-imposed ban halfway-or-more through the season is disgraceful.

This. Those transfers were thrown into the wind without a care by poor Rickie P. But at least they had some good scotch.
 
06-15-2017 10:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2017 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2017 MyBB Group.