https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/tweet...00734.html

I love it.

does that come with bleu cheese and croutons???

More troll bait

(06-12-2017 06:15 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  More troll bait

that's all firmbizzle does....but he's kinda funny doing it....he makes me laugh at times

(06-12-2017 06:17 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 06:15 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  More troll bait

that's all firmbizzle does....but he's kinda funny doing it....he makes me laugh at times

Pssst, look up.

I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.

The name of the bill is childish, however.

(06-12-2017 07:07 PM)Niner National Wrote:  I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.

The name of the bill is childish, however.

sooooo....that's what is deemed 'acceptable'

I truly live in hell now....

(06-12-2017 07:07 PM)Niner National Wrote:  I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.

The name of the bill is childish, however.

I'm sorry I have to be rude but that's absolutely idiotic.

A person doesn't lose their right to an opinion or the means of expression just because they assume a public office.

"Covfefe" Act? Mike "Trying to Make a Name for Myself" Quigley.


The button pushing continues.

Quote:It should be noted, however, that there is still a question as to whether Trump's personal twitter account will be treated the same way as the official @POTUS account.

(06-12-2017 08:24 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 07:07 PM)Niner National Wrote:  I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.

The name of the bill is childish, however.

I'm sorry I have to be rude but that's absolutely idiotic.

A person doesn't lose their right to an opinion or the means of expression just because they assume a public office.

Public record = lose of right to opinion and expression.

See your first sentence.

My 90 year-old Hillary supporting ma is asking me when they are going to leave Trump alone?

That's not what you want.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

your taxpayer money at work right there...

You're still on covfefe?

The resistance is losing steam.

(06-13-2017 09:14 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  You're still on covfefe?

The resistance is losing steam.

I'm perfectly happy to continue to point la resit down every rabbit hole I can....


/covfefe

(06-12-2017 08:48 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 08:24 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 07:07 PM)Niner National Wrote:  I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.

The name of the bill is childish, however.

I'm sorry I have to be rude but that's absolutely idiotic.

A person doesn't lose their right to an opinion or the means of expression just because they assume a public office.

Public record = lose of right to opinion and expression.

See your first sentence.

I was having a hard time following that line of logic too. Since when does making your public statements/tweets a matter of public record, equal taking away your right to express your opinion?

(06-13-2017 10:44 AM)JerryJeff Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 08:48 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 08:24 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 07:07 PM)Niner National Wrote:  I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.

The name of the bill is childish, however.

I'm sorry I have to be rude but that's absolutely idiotic.

A person doesn't lose their right to an opinion or the means of expression just because they assume a public office.

Public record = lose of right to opinion and expression.

See your first sentence.

I was having a hard time following that line of logic too. Since when does making your public statements/tweets a matter of public record, equal taking away your right to express your opinion?

Bless both your poor little hearts...

You don't get that by making something that is private public record is essentially seizing it?

The Twitter account is private, existed prior to the election, and discusses nothing other than opinion. The government has no legitimate claim to it other than to chill the speech.

(06-13-2017 11:38 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 10:44 AM)JerryJeff Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 08:48 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 08:24 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 07:07 PM)Niner National Wrote:  I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.

The name of the bill is childish, however.

I'm sorry I have to be rude but that's absolutely idiotic.

A person doesn't lose their right to an opinion or the means of expression just because they assume a public office.

Public record = lose of right to opinion and expression.

See your first sentence.

I was having a hard time following that line of logic too. Since when does making your public statements/tweets a matter of public record, equal taking away your right to express your opinion?

Bless both your poor little hearts...

You don't get that by making something that is private public record is essentially seizing it?

The Twitter account is private, existed prior to the election, and discusses nothing other than opinion. The government has no legitimate claim to it other than to chill the speech.

Hmmmm. That's a good point.

All I see is the Liberalturds are trying to suppress free speech. If CB is loving it then I'll go opposite, I don't like CB to be happy, at all.

I haven't really seen any tweets from Trump that would make him squeamish to post. Keep it up Donnie that's the only tool you have against the MSM idiots. They hate it thus their insistence to squelch them...and you can't tell me it wasn't suggested by one of those idiot MSM CEOs.

Oh CB, you better watch what those Liberalturd congressmen pass or it might bite them like the Reid Bill. I'm sure the idiot is regretting it now.

(06-13-2017 11:38 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 10:44 AM)JerryJeff Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 08:48 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 08:24 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 07:07 PM)Niner National Wrote:  I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.

The name of the bill is childish, however.

I'm sorry I have to be rude but that's absolutely idiotic.

A person doesn't lose their right to an opinion or the means of expression just because they assume a public office.

Public record = lose of right to opinion and expression.

See your first sentence.

I was having a hard time following that line of logic too. Since when does making your public statements/tweets a matter of public record, equal taking away your right to express your opinion?

Bless both your poor little hearts...

You don't get that by making something that is private public record is essentially seizing it?

The Twitter account is private, existed prior to the election, and discusses nothing other than opinion. The government has no legitimate claim to it other than to chill the speech.

I'm not sure how much experience on Twitter but unless you set your account to private everything you post is up for the public to see. Trump has not done this. Plus Potus doesn't own his tweets, Twitter does, when he agreed to the terms of service he agreed to relinquish all ownership and rights to decide what happens with those tweets.

(06-13-2017 12:40 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 11:38 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 10:44 AM)JerryJeff Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 08:48 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(06-12-2017 08:24 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  I'm sorry I have to be rude but that's absolutely idiotic.

A person doesn't lose their right to an opinion or the means of expression just because they assume a public office.

Public record = lose of right to opinion and expression.

See your first sentence.

I was having a hard time following that line of logic too. Since when does making your public statements/tweets a matter of public record, equal taking away your right to express your opinion?

Bless both your poor little hearts...

You don't get that by making something that is private public record is essentially seizing it?

The Twitter account is private, existed prior to the election, and discusses nothing other than opinion. The government has no legitimate claim to it other than to chill the speech.

I'm not sure how much experience on Twitter but unless you set your account to private everything you post is up for the public to see. Trump has not done this. Plus Potus doesn't own his tweets, Twitter does, when he agreed to the terms of service he agreed to relinquish all ownership and rights to decide what happens with those tweets.

Quote:Your Rights
You retain your rights to any Content you submit, post or display on or through the Services. What’s yours is yours — you own your Content (and your photos and videos are part of the Content).

https://twitter.com/tos?lang=en