CougarRed
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,450
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 429
I Root For: Houston
Location:
|
A look back at the value of TV deals: 2009
Big 10 - $242M/year for 11 schools
SEC - $205M/year for 12 schools
Big 12- $78M/year for 12 schools
ACC - $67M/year for 12 schools
Pac 10 - $58M/year for 10 schools
Big East - $33M/year for 8 football schools and 8 basketball schools
http://collegesportsinfo.com/2010/05/17/...-per-year/
If Aresco can get a deal worth $5.5M - $6M a year per school, then he's getting 2009 era ACC/Big 12/Pac 10 money.
(This post was last modified: 05-29-2017 09:35 AM by CougarRed.)
|
|
05-29-2017 09:32 AM |
|
Cubanbull
Hall of Famer
Posts: 22,617
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 392
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: A look back at the value of TV deals: 2009
Well that Big East deal doesn't look much difference than what AAC currently has
|
|
05-29-2017 09:55 AM |
|
Attackcoog
Moderator
Posts: 44,836
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2880
I Root For: Houston
Location:
|
RE: A look back at the value of TV deals: 2009
(05-29-2017 09:32 AM)CougarRed Wrote: Big 10 - $242M/year for 11 schools
SEC - $205M/year for 12 schools
Big 12- $78M/year for 12 schools
ACC - $67M/year for 12 schools
Pac 10 - $58M/year for 10 schools
Big East - $33M/year for 8 football schools and 8 basketball schools
http://collegesportsinfo.com/2010/05/17/...-per-year/
If Aresco can get a deal worth $5.5M - $6M a year per school, then he's getting 2009 era ACC/Big 12/Pac 10 money.
And, at 5-6 million, he would be getting more than the old Big East. Another interesting measuring stick is the 2011 rejected ESPN offer, Supposedly that would have paid the old Big East all-sports schools about 10 million a school.
|
|
05-29-2017 09:56 AM |
|
CougarRed
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,450
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 429
I Root For: Houston
Location:
|
RE: A look back at the value of TV deals: 2009
(05-29-2017 09:56 AM)Attackcoog Wrote: Another interesting measuring stick is the 2011 rejected ESPN offer, Supposedly that would have paid the old Big East all-sports schools about 10 million a school.
As much as $11M
http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily...-East.aspx
Or $10.3M with a 60/40 split.
http://deadspin.com/5968450/someone-plea...sts-demise
Interesting, that offer was about $130M a year.
Well, the C7 got $5M a year from Fox = $35M
Pitt & Syracuse got $13M a year in the first ACC deal = $26M
TCU & West Va got $19M a year in the Big 12 = $38M
ND got $~5M a year from the ACC
The Original American deal was worth $22M a year
Add it up, and it equals $126M, or almost exactly the amount the Big East turned down.
It was like TV (ESPN) had a budget for those schools, one way or the other . . .
(This post was last modified: 05-29-2017 10:13 AM by CougarRed.)
|
|
05-29-2017 10:00 AM |
|
Cubanbull
Hall of Famer
Posts: 22,617
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 392
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: A look back at the value of TV deals: 2009
(05-29-2017 10:00 AM)CougarRed Wrote: (05-29-2017 09:56 AM)Attackcoog Wrote: Another interesting measuring stick is the 2011 rejected ESPN offer, Supposedly that would have paid the old Big East all-sports schools about 10 million a school.
$11M
http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily...-East.aspx
Unrealistic comparison when that league was still in name attached to the current P5 and still had schools like WV,Pitt,Cuse,UL, Rutgers all now in P5 as well as the C7
I think the 5-6 million is a good bar to compare.
|
|
05-29-2017 10:10 AM |
|
Attackcoog
Moderator
Posts: 44,836
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2880
I Root For: Houston
Location:
|
RE: A look back at the value of TV deals: 2009
(05-29-2017 10:10 AM)Cubanbull Wrote: (05-29-2017 10:00 AM)CougarRed Wrote: (05-29-2017 09:56 AM)Attackcoog Wrote: Another interesting measuring stick is the 2011 rejected ESPN offer, Supposedly that would have paid the old Big East all-sports schools about 10 million a school.
$11M
http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily...-East.aspx
Unrealistic comparison when that league was still in name attached to the current P5 and still had schools like WV,Pitt,Cuse,UL, Rutgers all now in P5 as well as the C7
I think the 5-6 million is a good bar to compare.
Agree. I think 5-6 is a reasonable amount for what the AAC is now. 10-11 million is the best "comp" for the value of what Aresco would like to see us become---a weak power conference with no "king" football programs---but really high quality basketball.
(This post was last modified: 05-29-2017 10:15 AM by Attackcoog.)
|
|
05-29-2017 10:14 AM |
|
Attackcoog
Moderator
Posts: 44,836
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2880
I Root For: Houston
Location:
|
RE: A look back at the value of TV deals: 2009
(05-29-2017 10:00 AM)CougarRed Wrote: (05-29-2017 09:56 AM)Attackcoog Wrote: Another interesting measuring stick is the 2011 rejected ESPN offer, Supposedly that would have paid the old Big East all-sports schools about 10 million a school.
As much as $11M
http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily...-East.aspx
Or $10.3M with a 60/40 split.
http://deadspin.com/5968450/someone-plea...sts-demise
Interesting, that offer was about $130M a year.
Well, the C7 got $5M a year from Fox = $35M
Pitt & Syracuse got $13M a year in the first ACC deal = $26M
TCU & West Va got $19M a year in the Big 12 = $38M
ND got $~5M a year from the ACC
The Original American deal was worth $22M a year
Add it up, and it equals $126M, or almost exactly the amount the Big East turned down.
It was like TV (ESPN) had a budget for those schools, one way or the other . . .
Ive made that point before when people talk about how ESPN saved so much money by breaking up the old Big East. No....they really didnt. When you add Rutgers and Louisville to your numbers above (thats another 30-35 million or so?)----It actually cost ESPN quite a bit MORE than the 130 million dollar offer.
(This post was last modified: 05-29-2017 10:26 AM by Attackcoog.)
|
|
05-29-2017 10:18 AM |
|