(05-27-2017 06:55 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2017 05:58 PM)pcm0103 Wrote:  I ran across this article today which really has my mind boggled. A 15 year old was given 6 life terms for armed robbery. No one was killed. I am researching it because there has to be more to this. Any lawyers on this board care to chime in as to why he got that sentence?

http://pilotonline.com/news/local/crime/...c982c.html

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

The article pretty much answers your question if you actually bother to read it

"Blount robbed a Norfolk house party in 2006 along with two 18-year-olds, who received 10- and 13-year sentences. No shots were fired, and no one was seriously injured. The two older men pleaded guilty, but Blount refused, insisting he didn’t commit all of the crimes he was charged with. A jury convicted him of 49 of 51 felonies and then-Circuit Judge Charles Griffith gave him his original sentence of six life terms plus 118 years."

It is a poorly written article by someone that appears to have a 5th grade education but still comprehensible.

You guys really like to assume things, making you look foolish. Especially when you think you know but are totally wrong. I read the entire article, I was just unclear as to what the 49 charges are. Which I clearly stated in my post. I guess you didn't read it.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

(05-27-2017 05:36 PM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(05-27-2017 06:55 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2017 05:58 PM)pcm0103 Wrote:  I ran across this article today which really has my mind boggled. A 15 year old was given 6 life terms for armed robbery. No one was killed. I am researching it because there has to be more to this. Any lawyers on this board care to chime in as to why he got that sentence?

http://pilotonline.com/news/local/crime/...c982c.html

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

The article pretty much answers your question if you actually bother to read it

"Blount robbed a Norfolk house party in 2006 along with two 18-year-olds, who received 10- and 13-year sentences. No shots were fired, and no one was seriously injured. The two older men pleaded guilty, but Blount refused, insisting he didn’t commit all of the crimes he was charged with. A jury convicted him of 49 of 51 felonies and then-Circuit Judge Charles Griffith gave him his original sentence of six life terms plus 118 years."

It is a poorly written article by someone that appears to have a 5th grade education but still comprehensible.

You guys really like to assume things, making you look foolish. Especially when you think you know but are totally wrong. I read the entire article, I was just unclear as to what the 49 charges are. Which I clearly stated in my post. I guess you didn't read it.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Dont be ridiculous. You know why from the article and the other recent case in Virginia. If you wanna debate sentencing say so.

https://youtu.be/MA2NDf9LdDE

(05-27-2017 06:47 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-27-2017 05:36 PM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(05-27-2017 06:55 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2017 05:58 PM)pcm0103 Wrote:  I ran across this article today which really has my mind boggled. A 15 year old was given 6 life terms for armed robbery. No one was killed. I am researching it because there has to be more to this. Any lawyers on this board care to chime in as to why he got that sentence?

http://pilotonline.com/news/local/crime/...c982c.html

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

The article pretty much answers your question if you actually bother to read it

"Blount robbed a Norfolk house party in 2006 along with two 18-year-olds, who received 10- and 13-year sentences. No shots were fired, and no one was seriously injured. The two older men pleaded guilty, but Blount refused, insisting he didn’t commit all of the crimes he was charged with. A jury convicted him of 49 of 51 felonies and then-Circuit Judge Charles Griffith gave him his original sentence of six life terms plus 118 years."

It is a poorly written article by someone that appears to have a 5th grade education but still comprehensible.

You guys really like to assume things, making you look foolish. Especially when you think you know but are totally wrong. I read the entire article, I was just unclear as to what the 49 charges are. Which I clearly stated in my post. I guess you didn't read it.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Dont be ridiculous. You know why from the article and the other recent case in Virginia. If you wanna debate sentencing say so.

https://youtu.be/MA2NDf9LdDE

Not being ridiculous. That's why I asked and UofMstateU answered. If I wanted to debate I would of said so. Plus I'm not going to debate something unless I have more info and full knowledge of the topic.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

He tried to debate the pronunciation of Conetoe and was shown up. Ha

(05-27-2017 07:30 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  He tried to debate the pronunciation of Conetoe and was shown up. Ha

Shown up by you? You wish. I guess it's really hard for you to tell the difference between a joke and debate. I guess that's why you couldn't respond to my reply.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

(05-27-2017 06:53 PM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(05-27-2017 06:47 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-27-2017 05:36 PM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(05-27-2017 06:55 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2017 05:58 PM)pcm0103 Wrote:  I ran across this article today which really has my mind boggled. A 15 year old was given 6 life terms for armed robbery. No one was killed. I am researching it because there has to be more to this. Any lawyers on this board care to chime in as to why he got that sentence?

http://pilotonline.com/news/local/crime/...c982c.html

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

The article pretty much answers your question if you actually bother to read it

"Blount robbed a Norfolk house party in 2006 along with two 18-year-olds, who received 10- and 13-year sentences. No shots were fired, and no one was seriously injured. The two older men pleaded guilty, but Blount refused, insisting he didn’t commit all of the crimes he was charged with. A jury convicted him of 49 of 51 felonies and then-Circuit Judge Charles Griffith gave him his original sentence of six life terms plus 118 years."

It is a poorly written article by someone that appears to have a 5th grade education but still comprehensible.

You guys really like to assume things, making you look foolish. Especially when you think you know but are totally wrong. I read the entire article, I was just unclear as to what the 49 charges are. Which I clearly stated in my post. I guess you didn't read it.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Dont be ridiculous. You know why from the article and the other recent case in Virginia. If you wanna debate sentencing say so.

https://youtu.be/MA2NDf9LdDE

Not being ridiculous. That's why I asked and UofMstateU answered. If I wanted to debate would of said so. Plus I'm not young to debate something unless I have more info and full knowledge of the topic.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nati...102207898/

This article above might interest you.

Guy should have taken the plea like the other two. As I read the article you quoted it seemed obvious that legal sentencing guidlines were followed. If you werent baiting i apologize.

(05-27-2017 04:54 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  

(05-27-2017 06:41 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  http://www.cbsnews.com/news/todd-kohlhep...-slayings/

Kind of hard to compare these two side to side. Kohlhepp is serving seven life sentences without a chance for parole but has admitted to killing at least seven people (and scarring others for life). I guess South Carolina doesn't have the death penalty because they can't afford the drugs for the lethal injections but they can afford to pay for the lowest of the lowlifes to be locked up in jail for 30-40 years I guess until they die of natural causes?

I guess you didn't bother to read the article that you linked to your post either. The death penalty that the Palmetto State has, was taken off the table since he didn't contest the charges.

Just like with Dylan Roof case a few months ago

I did read the story and the part I was referring to is right after the part of the story you read.

It says 'No one has been executed in South Carolina in more than six years because the state lacks the drugs needed for lethal injections.'

(05-27-2017 09:22 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-27-2017 06:53 PM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(05-27-2017 06:47 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-27-2017 05:36 PM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(05-27-2017 06:55 AM)shere khan Wrote:  The article pretty much answers your question if you actually bother to read it

"Blount robbed a Norfolk house party in 2006 along with two 18-year-olds, who received 10- and 13-year sentences. No shots were fired, and no one was seriously injured. The two older men pleaded guilty, but Blount refused, insisting he didn’t commit all of the crimes he was charged with. A jury convicted him of 49 of 51 felonies and then-Circuit Judge Charles Griffith gave him his original sentence of six life terms plus 118 years."

It is a poorly written article by someone that appears to have a 5th grade education but still comprehensible.

You guys really like to assume things, making you look foolish. Especially when you think you know but are totally wrong. I read the entire article, I was just unclear as to what the 49 charges are. Which I clearly stated in my post. I guess you didn't read it.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Dont be ridiculous. You know why from the article and the other recent case in Virginia. If you wanna debate sentencing say so.

https://youtu.be/MA2NDf9LdDE

Not being ridiculous. That's why I asked and UofMstateU answered. If I wanted to debate would of said so. Plus I'm not young to debate something unless I have more info and full knowledge of the topic.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nati...102207898/

This article above might interest you.

Guy should have taken the plea like the other two. As I read the article you quoted it seemed obvious that legal sentencing guidlines were followed. If you werent baiting i apologize.

No worries. Thanks for the article. Very insightful!

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk