There's plenty there you just have to look. Might have to stop using Fox News as your goto News. You probably won't see much if you are hanging out in their news media.


http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/23...ign-238719

Asked by Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.) if he saw any evidence of collusion during his time as CIA director, Brennan responded: “I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons.”

(05-23-2017 10:06 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Asked by Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.) if he saw any evidence of collusion during his time as CIA director, Brennan responded: “I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons.”

MUH BRENNAN!

I'd rather rely upon mother jones as a source.

(05-23-2017 10:02 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  There's plenty there you just have to look. Might have to stop using Fox News as your goto News. You probably won't see much if you are hanging out in their news media.


http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/23...ign-238719

Lol. From your own source.

Asked by Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.) if he saw any evidence of collusion during his time as CIA director, Brennan responded: “I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons.”


So--the answer would be "no". This investigation began nearly a year ago. At Just 8 months, Watergate had indictments and had already sent people to jail. If there was evidence, we'd at least have people charged by now. Instead, every person with any knowledge of this case when pressed admits there is no evidence of collusion. Give it up.

Frankly, now that we know the FBI, CIA, and NSA never did an investigation of the actual DNC servers and relied on a third party contractor paid by the DNC---even the idea that Russia is behind it all is suspect. Especially now we know The Seth Ric is the likely the actual Wikileaks source. Wonder who would want to kill him?

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/23...ook-238695

More..........

Especially now we know The Seth Ric is the likely the actual Wikileaks source.

Lies......................

So still no link of Trump and Russia? Not surprised...

(05-23-2017 10:18 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  So still no link of Trump and Russia? Not surprised...

I think the issue is those on the left apparently don't know what evidence is. It's not innuendo, speculation, or conjecture which is all that's come out on the Russia narrative. Even Feinstein has admitted twice that there is no evidence to date.

So your "evidence" is where the scandal-ridden former CIA director, who routinely broke the CIA's own rules, was asked point-blank if there was any evidence, and he couldn't confirm that there was?

(05-23-2017 10:09 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-23-2017 10:06 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Asked by Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.) if he saw any evidence of collusion during his time as CIA director, Brennan responded: “I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons.”

MUH BRENNAN!

I'd rather rely upon mother jones as a source.

LOL! Yeah, he's pretty bad.

And he still didn't have ANYTHING.

They TALKED to RUSSIANS!!!!!!!

"I encountered and am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals," he told lawmakers. "And it raised questions in my mind again whether or not the Russians were able to gain the cooperation of those individuals."

muh but no evidence...........................

(05-23-2017 10:28 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  "I encountered and am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals," he told lawmakers. "And it raised questions in my mind again whether or not the Russians were able to gain the cooperation of those individuals."

In other words, he knows of nothing illegal. We're right back to where we've always been.

(05-23-2017 10:28 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  "I encountered and am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals," he told lawmakers. "And it raised questions in my mind again whether or not the Russians were able to gain the cooperation of those individuals."

The bolded portion is not evidence, it is hearsay and likely hearsay within hearsay. Even if you took it as credible evidence, which It's not, it would only be evidence of contacts between Trump aides and Russians. Similar Similar to the contacts between Clinton aides and Russians. It is not evidence that establishes collusion or anything nefarious in nature.

In other words, he knows of nothing illegal.


no you haven't seen the evidence. HE HAS and he had concerns of collusion.................. Case closed on evidence. Quit saying it. It's beyond stupid.

(05-23-2017 10:28 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  "I encountered and am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals," he told lawmakers. "And it raised questions in my mind again whether or not the Russians were able to gain the cooperation of those individuals."

They TALKED to RUSSIANS!!!!!!!

I've talked to Russians using Russian. I know many Russians. I was even in the same hotel once with the President of Azerbaijan, someone Putin knows well. RUSSIANS!!!!!!

So whats illegal about people talking to the Russians?

Brennan says "sometimes people only realize they've gone down a treasonous path" once it's already too late. A chilling hint?

So whats illegal


Just treason...................

(05-23-2017 10:35 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Brennan says "sometimes people only realize they've gone down a treasonous path" once it's already too late. A chilling hint?

He's probably speaking from experience.