Fake News

(05-22-2017 07:50 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Fake News

So when the only person who actually knows who did the leak, Julian Assange, says it was a Democrat, its fake news?

As opposed to the anonymous sources who have no possible way of directly knowing give you all your news?

The standards you guys have are completely different depending if it's a D or an R.

Floors me actually. Assange is a conspirator for the Russians. Way before these events too.

(05-21-2017 10:26 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Cops never asked for the security footage or talked to the employees at the bar Rich was last seen at before he was killed? REALLY?

http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/bar-manager-c...rich-died/

Don't forget Vince Fosters " Suicide" was handled by Park Rangers and Police told to not investigate. Swept under the rug.

Its telling to me that the democrats dont give two sh*ts about who killed Seth Rich.

(05-22-2017 08:13 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Its telling to me that the democrats dont give two sh*ts about who killed Seth Rich.

It's a war against Republicans and some folk just are collateral damage.

(05-22-2017 08:16 AM)LeFlâneur Wrote:  

(05-22-2017 08:13 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Its telling to me that the democrats dont give two sh*ts about who killed Seth Rich.

It's a war against Republicans and some folk just are collateral damage.

This is very similar to what drug lords do when underlings get nabbed by the cops - they have them killed so the underlings can't spill the beans and finger higher-ups.

This is the same thing only in Clinton politics....... The Clintons = Drug Lords...... same ethical standards.

Old but interesting...

http://www.inquisitr.com/3798526/craig-m...ot-russia/

Quote:Craig Murray, a WikiLeaks operative, said he personally received Clinton campaign emails from “disgusted Democratic insiders,” the Daily Mail is reporting. Murray said he was coming out with this stunning revelation because of the information being circulated that hackers working with Moscow helped Donald Trump win the U.S. presidential election.

Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and now a close associate of Julian Assange, revealed that he flew to Washington, D.C., and collected leaked emails from whistle blowers inside the Democratic Party. According to him, they were disgusted with the wholesale corruption in the Clinton camp and the DNC for sabotaging Bernie Sander’s presidential ambition.

(05-22-2017 08:16 AM)LeFlâneur Wrote:  

(05-22-2017 08:13 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Its telling to me that the democrats dont give two sh*ts about who killed Seth Rich.

It's a war against Republicans and some folk just are collateral damage.

I think it's a lot bigger than that. There's a war on the middle class and populism.

(05-22-2017 08:28 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(05-22-2017 08:16 AM)LeFlâneur Wrote:  

(05-22-2017 08:13 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Its telling to me that the democrats dont give two sh*ts about who killed Seth Rich.

It's a war against Republicans and some folk just are collateral damage.

I think it's a lot bigger than that. There's a war on the middle class and populism.

Democrats will eat their own when its all said and done. Left wing extremists highjacked a once proud party. This is not Your Grandfathers Democrat party for the people.

(05-22-2017 08:01 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The standards you guys have are completely different depending if it's a D or an R.

Floors me actually. Assange is a conspirator for the Russians. Way before these events too.

Like when he released a bunch of Russian documents in 2010?

Like when he released a bunch of Russian documents in 2010?

Link?

(05-22-2017 08:13 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Its telling to me that the democrats dont give two sh*ts about who killed Seth Rich.

Cernovich was talking about this last night in his live stream. In their attempt to sweep it under the rug, they painted an even bigger target on their back. Where's their public plea to find the killer of one of their beloved employees? Why haven't they offered a reward? Why didn't they exploit his death to push for gun control like they do everyone else?

For those on the right

federalist-

http://thefederalist.com/2016/09/09/juli...m-fighter/

for those on the left.

https://www.vox.com/world/2017/1/6/14179...ussia-ties

(05-22-2017 08:59 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  For those on the right

federalist-

http://thefederalist.com/2016/09/09/juli...m-fighter/

Nothing but conjecture and childish name-calling.

Quote:for those on the left.

https://www.vox.com/world/2017/1/6/14179...ussia-ties

Starts off with the thoroughly-debunked CrowdStrike report.

(05-22-2017 08:01 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The standards you guys have are completely different depending if it's a D or an R.

Floors me actually. Assange is a conspirator for the Russians. Way before these events too.

You are clueless how well you describe yourself. Its really quite amazing.

Assange may well be lying, but he is the only person who really knows. And his explanation makes perfect sense. So you discount him and believe people who have no clue because it suits your purposes.

(05-22-2017 09:24 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(05-22-2017 08:59 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  For those on the right

federalist-

http://thefederalist.com/2016/09/09/juli...m-fighter/

Nothing but conjecture and childish name-calling.

Quote:for those on the left.

https://www.vox.com/world/2017/1/6/14179...ussia-ties

Starts off with the thoroughly-debunked CrowdStrike report.

Got to agree with you.

Nobody is saying Assange is any sort of saint. He's an anarchist who wants to burn down everything. But he's not a Russian agent.

But he's not a Russian agent.


You don't know that.

(05-22-2017 10:12 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  But he's not a Russian agent.


You don't know that.

You don't know that he is.

You've been claiming Trump is and everyone else connected to Trump, despite even Democrats claiming there is no evidence on Trump and every one of these people with possibly 3 exceptions. And those 3 all have logical explanations that make a lot more sense than them being Russian agents.

Hillary and Podesta have more ties and more suspicious activity than Flynn, who is the most questionable of the bunch.