Wow, behind a pay wall. Attempting to profit off a tragedy? Classy.
Think McFly, think. WaPo and NYT both allow you several free stories a month. Once you surpass that, they want you to subscribe. It's fairly common. You can always delete your cookies and then it will be accessible again.
Wow, behind a pay wall. Attempting to profit off a tragedy? Classy.
I'll summarize. The Podesta Post, of "RUSSIA HACKS US ELECTRICAL GRID!!!" infamy, used the buzz phrases conspiracy theory, fake news, and fringe media approximately 1,053 times and speculated about things that can't be proven.
Quote:The latest revelation — that someone may have been trying to hack into Rich’s email — offered fresh evidence that the conspiracy theory is false. The family worried that Dotcom, or someone eager to prove him right, may have been willing to create a fake archive of emails from Rich, or crack a password to see whether Rich had passed on documents with a Mega account.
That's right. According to the unverified word of Rich's family (and bear in mind that the representatives of the family have DNC ties), someone (don't know who) tried to hack into his e-mail, which somehow seems to prove that he wasn't involved in the leak (which is how new WaPO contributor John Podesta referred to it in his mails, not as a "hack"). Then they baselessly wag a finger at Dotcom and speculate wildly about the motive for hacking into Rich's e-mails. Such is the sad state of "journalism" at WaPo these days.