(05-18-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:54 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:47 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:41 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:26 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Ding...ding...ding. We have a winner.

Comey likely laughed off the suggestion knowing that trump's question was meaningless to him.

So, that negates the whole "obstruction of justice" thing. Works both ways I guess.

No one in their right mind is saying this is Obstruction of Justice.

Correct. Which is why the stinky pants libturds need to learn something, and fast. The ONLY crime we know committed is the illegal unmasking and leaking of Flynn's name to the media. And that was on the Obama administration.

We also know that Rosenstein wanted Comey fired immediately. He likely determined several things:

1. Comey had screwed up the prosecution of Hillary's email server, and it needs to be fixed

2. Comey refused to investigate Hillary's false statements to congress, requiring Chaffetz to file a request to do so.

3. Comey failed to investigate the Lynch/Clinton tarmac meeting as required by law to do.

4. Comey failed to investigate the Obama administration official who unmasked and leaked Flynn's name, as required by law to do.

5. Leaks were coming out of the FBI in which Comey was not investigating or stopping

Let's see what kind of leaks of fake news happens now that there is a special counsel snooping around.

Wrong again. Unmasking is not illegal.

Next topic

I will bet you a lifetime ban from this site that unmasking and leaking a private citizens name is illegal. Are you ready to man up and take that bet?

(05-18-2017 10:01 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:47 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:41 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:26 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 08:55 AM)Paul M Wrote:  I wouldn't call asking pressuring.

Ding...ding...ding. We have a winner.

Comey likely laughed off the suggestion knowing that trump's question was meaningless to him.

So, that negates the whole "obstruction of justice" thing. Works both ways I guess.

No one in their right mind is saying this is Obstruction of Justice.

yeah... except for you.

(05-17-2017 09:30 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  And there is still a possibility that a lot of that happened. Remember, Trump didn't just ask Comey to let Flynn go, he also fired him and admitted he did it because of the "Russia thing". All of that taken in context begins to build a case for someone if they wanted to pursue impeachment for obstruction of justice.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-817960.html

(05-17-2017 09:28 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  I agree. This conversation by itself is not enough to prove obstruction of justice. However, taken in context with everything else that has happened like the firing of Comey soon after begins to make a case to that end.

If someone wanted to actually impeach the President for Obstruction of Justice, there are beginning to make a case now.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-817944-post-143...id14341896

(05-12-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Trump’s tweet seems to stem from his frustration over the fallout from his firing of FBI Director James Comey earlier this week. Trump told NBC on Thursday that he was looking for an excuse to fire Comey, who was leading an investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia.

Comey could testify during an investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia, meaning the president’s tweet could be seen as witness intimidation.

Linky



Obstruction of Justice?
Witness intimidation?

http://csnbbs.com/thread-817645-post-143...id14331377

hahahahahaha

(05-18-2017 10:07 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:01 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:47 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:41 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:26 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Ding...ding...ding. We have a winner.

Comey likely laughed off the suggestion knowing that trump's question was meaningless to him.

So, that negates the whole "obstruction of justice" thing. Works both ways I guess.

No one in their right mind is saying this is Obstruction of Justice.

yeah... except for you.

(05-17-2017 09:30 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  And there is still a possibility that a lot of that happened. Remember, Trump didn't just ask Comey to let Flynn go, he also fired him and admitted he did it because of the "Russia thing". All of that taken in context begins to build a case for someone if they wanted to pursue impeachment for obstruction of justice.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-817960.html

(05-17-2017 09:28 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  I agree. This conversation by itself is not enough to prove obstruction of justice. However, taken in context with everything else that has happened like the firing of Comey soon after begins to make a case to that end.

If someone wanted to actually impeach the President for Obstruction of Justice, there are beginning to make a case now.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-817944-post-143...id14341896

(05-12-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Trump’s tweet seems to stem from his frustration over the fallout from his firing of FBI Director James Comey earlier this week. Trump told NBC on Thursday that he was looking for an excuse to fire Comey, who was leading an investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia.

Comey could testify during an investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia, meaning the president’s tweet could be seen as witness intimidation.

Linky



Obstruction of Justice?
Witness intimidation?

http://csnbbs.com/thread-817645-post-143...id14331377

hahahahahaha

Yeah, it's so "Trump must go" at any price some of them can't even keep their stories straight. Whatever happens with the special prosecutor happens, but if nothing comes from it, well, seeing folks explode will be hilarious.

(05-18-2017 10:02 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:54 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:47 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:41 AM)VA49er Wrote:  So, that negates the whole "obstruction of justice" thing. Works both ways I guess.

No one in their right mind is saying this is Obstruction of Justice.

Correct. Which is why the stinky pants libturds need to learn something, and fast. The ONLY crime we know committed is the illegal unmasking and leaking of Flynn's name to the media. And that was on the Obama administration.

We also know that Rosenstein wanted Comey fired immediately. He likely determined several things:

1. Comey had screwed up the prosecution of Hillary's email server, and it needs to be fixed

2. Comey refused to investigate Hillary's false statements to congress, requiring Chaffetz to file a request to do so.

3. Comey failed to investigate the Lynch/Clinton tarmac meeting as required by law to do.

4. Comey failed to investigate the Obama administration official who unmasked and leaked Flynn's name, as required by law to do.

5. Leaks were coming out of the FBI in which Comey was not investigating or stopping

Let's see what kind of leaks of fake news happens now that there is a special counsel snooping around.

Wrong again. Unmasking is not illegal.

Next topic

I will bet you a lifetime ban from this site that unmasking and leaking a private citizens name is illegal. Are you ready to man up and take that bet?

Let me know when you see this challenge so I dont have to keep bumping it because you claim "not to have seen it." You dont have to commit to it yet, just acknowledge that you see it.

(05-18-2017 10:02 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:54 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:47 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:41 AM)VA49er Wrote:  So, that negates the whole "obstruction of justice" thing. Works both ways I guess.

No one in their right mind is saying this is Obstruction of Justice.

Correct. Which is why the stinky pants libturds need to learn something, and fast. The ONLY crime we know committed is the illegal unmasking and leaking of Flynn's name to the media. And that was on the Obama administration.

We also know that Rosenstein wanted Comey fired immediately. He likely determined several things:

1. Comey had screwed up the prosecution of Hillary's email server, and it needs to be fixed

2. Comey refused to investigate Hillary's false statements to congress, requiring Chaffetz to file a request to do so.

3. Comey failed to investigate the Lynch/Clinton tarmac meeting as required by law to do.

4. Comey failed to investigate the Obama administration official who unmasked and leaked Flynn's name, as required by law to do.

5. Leaks were coming out of the FBI in which Comey was not investigating or stopping

Let's see what kind of leaks of fake news happens now that there is a special counsel snooping around.

Wrong again. Unmasking is not illegal.

Next topic

I will bet you a lifetime ban from this site that unmasking and leaking a private citizens name is illegal. Are you ready to man up and take that bet?

Well, since you moved the goal post, who would?

We ALL know that leaking the name is illegal. Next topic.

(05-18-2017 10:19 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:02 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:54 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:47 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  No one in their right mind is saying this is Obstruction of Justice.

Correct. Which is why the stinky pants libturds need to learn something, and fast. The ONLY crime we know committed is the illegal unmasking and leaking of Flynn's name to the media. And that was on the Obama administration.

We also know that Rosenstein wanted Comey fired immediately. He likely determined several things:

1. Comey had screwed up the prosecution of Hillary's email server, and it needs to be fixed

2. Comey refused to investigate Hillary's false statements to congress, requiring Chaffetz to file a request to do so.

3. Comey failed to investigate the Lynch/Clinton tarmac meeting as required by law to do.

4. Comey failed to investigate the Obama administration official who unmasked and leaked Flynn's name, as required by law to do.

5. Leaks were coming out of the FBI in which Comey was not investigating or stopping

Let's see what kind of leaks of fake news happens now that there is a special counsel snooping around.

Wrong again. Unmasking is not illegal.

Next topic

I will bet you a lifetime ban from this site that unmasking and leaking a private citizens name is illegal. Are you ready to man up and take that bet?

Well, since you moved the goal post, who would?

We ALL know that leaking the name is illegal. Next topic.

Actually, I didnt move the goalpost, captain butthurt. My post contained the phrase "unmasking and leaking". It was FIT who moved the goalposts and said unmasking is not illegal. (Which isnt entirely true. Unmasking IS illegal unless it is done according tot he law.)

So, if either you or FIT would like to take me up on the lifetime ban, please speak up.

(05-18-2017 10:02 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:54 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:47 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:41 AM)VA49er Wrote:  So, that negates the whole "obstruction of justice" thing. Works both ways I guess.

No one in their right mind is saying this is Obstruction of Justice.

Correct. Which is why the stinky pants libturds need to learn something, and fast. The ONLY crime we know committed is the illegal unmasking and leaking of Flynn's name to the media. And that was on the Obama administration.

We also know that Rosenstein wanted Comey fired immediately. He likely determined several things:

1. Comey had screwed up the prosecution of Hillary's email server, and it needs to be fixed

2. Comey refused to investigate Hillary's false statements to congress, requiring Chaffetz to file a request to do so.

3. Comey failed to investigate the Lynch/Clinton tarmac meeting as required by law to do.

4. Comey failed to investigate the Obama administration official who unmasked and leaked Flynn's name, as required by law to do.

5. Leaks were coming out of the FBI in which Comey was not investigating or stopping

Let's see what kind of leaks of fake news happens now that there is a special counsel snooping around.

Wrong again. Unmasking is not illegal.

Next topic

I will bet you a lifetime ban from this site that unmasking and leaking a private citizens name is illegal. Are you ready to man up and take that bet?

Perhaps you should read this before you wish to make a bet.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/04/q-o...ation.html


IS IT ILLEGAL TO UNMASK AN AMERICAN'S NAME?

It is not illegal to unmask the identity of an American incidentally swept up in foreign surveillance, but Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Andrew Napolitano said the unmasking must have a national security rationale.

(05-18-2017 10:52 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:02 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:54 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:47 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  No one in their right mind is saying this is Obstruction of Justice.

Correct. Which is why the stinky pants libturds need to learn something, and fast. The ONLY crime we know committed is the illegal unmasking and leaking of Flynn's name to the media. And that was on the Obama administration.

We also know that Rosenstein wanted Comey fired immediately. He likely determined several things:

1. Comey had screwed up the prosecution of Hillary's email server, and it needs to be fixed

2. Comey refused to investigate Hillary's false statements to congress, requiring Chaffetz to file a request to do so.

3. Comey failed to investigate the Lynch/Clinton tarmac meeting as required by law to do.

4. Comey failed to investigate the Obama administration official who unmasked and leaked Flynn's name, as required by law to do.

5. Leaks were coming out of the FBI in which Comey was not investigating or stopping

Let's see what kind of leaks of fake news happens now that there is a special counsel snooping around.

Wrong again. Unmasking is not illegal.

Next topic

I will bet you a lifetime ban from this site that unmasking and leaking a private citizens name is illegal. Are you ready to man up and take that bet?

Perhaps you should read this before you wish to make a bet.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/04/q-o...ation.html


IS IT ILLEGAL TO UNMASK AN AMERICAN'S NAME?

It is not illegal to unmask the identity of an American incidentally swept up in foreign surveillance, but Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Andrew Napolitano said the unmasking must have a national security rationale.

Read my post again, and either agree to the bet or not. Man up.

(05-18-2017 10:56 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:52 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:02 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:54 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Correct. Which is why the stinky pants libturds need to learn something, and fast. The ONLY crime we know committed is the illegal unmasking and leaking of Flynn's name to the media. And that was on the Obama administration.

We also know that Rosenstein wanted Comey fired immediately. He likely determined several things:

1. Comey had screwed up the prosecution of Hillary's email server, and it needs to be fixed

2. Comey refused to investigate Hillary's false statements to congress, requiring Chaffetz to file a request to do so.

3. Comey failed to investigate the Lynch/Clinton tarmac meeting as required by law to do.

4. Comey failed to investigate the Obama administration official who unmasked and leaked Flynn's name, as required by law to do.

5. Leaks were coming out of the FBI in which Comey was not investigating or stopping

Let's see what kind of leaks of fake news happens now that there is a special counsel snooping around.

Wrong again. Unmasking is not illegal.

Next topic

I will bet you a lifetime ban from this site that unmasking and leaking a private citizens name is illegal. Are you ready to man up and take that bet?

Perhaps you should read this before you wish to make a bet.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/04/q-o...ation.html


IS IT ILLEGAL TO UNMASK AN AMERICAN'S NAME?

It is not illegal to unmask the identity of an American incidentally swept up in foreign surveillance, but Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Andrew Napolitano said the unmasking must have a national security rationale.

Read my post again, and either agree to the bet or not. Man up.

I read your post and there is no evidence that anyone in the Obama administration unmasked and leaked Flynn's name.

Until you provide that proof, we don't have a deal.

(05-18-2017 11:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:56 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:52 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:02 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Wrong again. Unmasking is not illegal.

Next topic

I will bet you a lifetime ban from this site that unmasking and leaking a private citizens name is illegal. Are you ready to man up and take that bet?

Perhaps you should read this before you wish to make a bet.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/04/q-o...ation.html


IS IT ILLEGAL TO UNMASK AN AMERICAN'S NAME?

It is not illegal to unmask the identity of an American incidentally swept up in foreign surveillance, but Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Andrew Napolitano said the unmasking must have a national security rationale.

Read my post again, and either agree to the bet or not. Man up.

I read your post and there is no evidence that anyone in the Obama administration unmasked and leaked Flynn's name.

Until you provide that proof, we don't have a deal.

bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha


just like I thought.....

(05-18-2017 11:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:56 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:52 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:02 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Wrong again. Unmasking is not illegal.

Next topic

I will bet you a lifetime ban from this site that unmasking and leaking a private citizens name is illegal. Are you ready to man up and take that bet?

Perhaps you should read this before you wish to make a bet.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/04/q-o...ation.html


IS IT ILLEGAL TO UNMASK AN AMERICAN'S NAME?

It is not illegal to unmask the identity of an American incidentally swept up in foreign surveillance, but Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Andrew Napolitano said the unmasking must have a national security rationale.

Read my post again, and either agree to the bet or not. Man up.

I read your post and there is no evidence that anyone in the Obama administration unmasked and leaked Flynn's name.

Until you provide that proof, we don't have a deal.

(05-18-2017 11:05 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:56 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:52 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:02 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  I will bet you a lifetime ban from this site that unmasking and leaking a private citizens name is illegal. Are you ready to man up and take that bet?

Perhaps you should read this before you wish to make a bet.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/04/q-o...ation.html


IS IT ILLEGAL TO UNMASK AN AMERICAN'S NAME?

It is not illegal to unmask the identity of an American incidentally swept up in foreign surveillance, but Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Andrew Napolitano said the unmasking must have a national security rationale.

Read my post again, and either agree to the bet or not. Man up.

I read your post and there is no evidence that anyone in the Obama administration unmasked and leaked Flynn's name.

Until you provide that proof, we don't have a deal.

I'm not running from anything. I never said that leaking wasn't illegal.

He is asking me to take a bet on something I don't even believe in.

(05-18-2017 11:05 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:56 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:52 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:02 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  I will bet you a lifetime ban from this site that unmasking and leaking a private citizens name is illegal. Are you ready to man up and take that bet?

Perhaps you should read this before you wish to make a bet.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/04/q-o...ation.html


IS IT ILLEGAL TO UNMASK AN AMERICAN'S NAME?

It is not illegal to unmask the identity of an American incidentally swept up in foreign surveillance, but Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Andrew Napolitano said the unmasking must have a national security rationale.

Read my post again, and either agree to the bet or not. Man up.

I read your post and there is no evidence that anyone in the Obama administration unmasked and leaked Flynn's name.

Until you provide that proof, we don't have a deal.

bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

(05-18-2017 11:09 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:05 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:56 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:52 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Perhaps you should read this before you wish to make a bet.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/04/q-o...ation.html


IS IT ILLEGAL TO UNMASK AN AMERICAN'S NAME?

It is not illegal to unmask the identity of an American incidentally swept up in foreign surveillance, but Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Andrew Napolitano said the unmasking must have a national security rationale.

Read my post again, and either agree to the bet or not. Man up.

I read your post and there is no evidence that anyone in the Obama administration unmasked and leaked Flynn's name.

Until you provide that proof, we don't have a deal.

bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

You are asking me to take a bet on something I never claimed to believe. I have never ever said that leaking isn't illegal. I simply said that it has not been proven that someone in the Obama administration leaked the name of Flynnn.

When was Flynn's named leaked? Do you know?

(05-18-2017 11:12 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:09 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:05 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 10:56 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Read my post again, and either agree to the bet or not. Man up.

I read your post and there is no evidence that anyone in the Obama administration unmasked and leaked Flynn's name.

Until you provide that proof, we don't have a deal.

bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

You are asking me to take a bet on something I never claimed to believe. I have never ever said that leaking isn't illegal. I simply said that it has not been proven that someone in the Obama administration leaked the name of Flynnn.

When was Flynn's named leaked? Do you know?

(05-18-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Wrong again. Unmasking is not illegal.

Next topic

FFS....

(05-18-2017 11:20 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:12 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:09 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:05 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  I read your post and there is no evidence that anyone in the Obama administration unmasked and leaked Flynn's name.

Until you provide that proof, we don't have a deal.

bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

You are asking me to take a bet on something I never claimed to believe. I have never ever said that leaking isn't illegal. I simply said that it has not been proven that someone in the Obama administration leaked the name of Flynnn.

When was Flynn's named leaked? Do you know?

(05-18-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Wrong again. Unmasking is not illegal.

Next topic

FFS....

That's right i said Unmasking is not illegal.

I stand by that statement and even provided a link from Fox News that proves I'm right.

Care to bet on that?

(05-18-2017 11:21 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:20 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:12 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:09 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:05 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

You are asking me to take a bet on something I never claimed to believe. I have never ever said that leaking isn't illegal. I simply said that it has not been proven that someone in the Obama administration leaked the name of Flynnn.

When was Flynn's named leaked? Do you know?

(05-18-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Wrong again. Unmasking is not illegal.

Next topic

FFS....

That's right i said Unmasking is not illegal.

I stand by that statement and even provided a link from Fox News that proves I'm right.

Care to bet on that?

Naw... I dont do bets with fit floppers.

(05-18-2017 11:24 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:21 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:20 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:12 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:09 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

You are asking me to take a bet on something I never claimed to believe. I have never ever said that leaking isn't illegal. I simply said that it has not been proven that someone in the Obama administration leaked the name of Flynnn.

When was Flynn's named leaked? Do you know?

(05-18-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Wrong again. Unmasking is not illegal.

Next topic

FFS....

That's right i said Unmasking is not illegal.

I stand by that statement and even provided a link from Fox News that proves I'm right.

Care to bet on that?

Naw... I dont do bets with fit floppers.

My position on this subject has never changed. I said from the beginning that unmasking is not illegal.

I never said anything about leaking.

Still waiting for someone to answer the question. When was Flynn's name leaked?

(05-18-2017 11:31 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:24 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:21 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:20 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:12 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  You are asking me to take a bet on something I never claimed to believe. I have never ever said that leaking isn't illegal. I simply said that it has not been proven that someone in the Obama administration leaked the name of Flynnn.

When was Flynn's named leaked? Do you know?

(05-18-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Wrong again. Unmasking is not illegal.

Next topic

FFS....

That's right i said Unmasking is not illegal.

I stand by that statement and even provided a link from Fox News that proves I'm right.

Care to bet on that?

Naw... I dont do bets with fit floppers.

My position on this subject has never changed. I said from the beginning that unmasking is not illegal.

I never said anything about leaking.

Still waiting for someone to answer the question. When was Flynn's name leaked?

are your arms sore from moving the goalposts around and dancing around the bet?

(05-18-2017 01:16 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:31 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:24 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:21 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-18-2017 11:20 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  FFS....

That's right i said Unmasking is not illegal.

I stand by that statement and even provided a link from Fox News that proves I'm right.

Care to bet on that?

Naw... I dont do bets with fit floppers.

My position on this subject has never changed. I said from the beginning that unmasking is not illegal.

I never said anything about leaking.

Still waiting for someone to answer the question. When was Flynn's name leaked?

are your arms sore from moving the goalposts around and dancing around the bet?

For the love of God dude. He's not going to bet against the sun rising in the East. That's basically what you keep wanting him to do.

He agrees with you that leaking is a crime.

So ******* drop it. Good grief!