I guess she is still believing those polls


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Hillary almost lost to Bernie. If her cronies have not rigged the primaries in her favor? Bernie Sanders would have won because he was having the same message as Trump, but much nicer words.

(05-02-2017 08:47 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Of course!

It wasn't the fact that she was also one of the most hated candidates of all time.

There was a solid 30% of the American populace that would not have voted for her under any circumstances.

She was a very poor choice and an even more horrendous candidate.

It was her "turn" and everyone on the inside was in on the fix.

What continues to amaze me is the total lack of the left even giving a crap that the corrupt DNC did everything in their ability to fix this thing from beginning to end.

Ya'll remember the scheduling of the debates on Sundays or Mondays against NFL games?

The entire thing was a setup from the word GO, and the bern would have likely won it without the corruption.

Apparently the team doesn't care...

(05-03-2017 12:43 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(05-02-2017 08:47 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Of course!

It wasn't the fact that she was also one of the most hated candidates of all time.

There was a solid 30% of the American populace that would not have voted for her under any circumstances.

She was a very poor choice and an even more horrendous candidate.

It was her "turn" and everyone on the inside was in on the fix.

What continues to amaze me is the total lack of the left even giving a crap that the corrupt DNC did everything in their ability to fix this thing from beginning to end.

Ya'll remember the scheduling of the debates on Sundays or Mondays against NFL games?

The entire thing was a setup from the word GO, and the bern would have likely won it without the corruption.

Apparently the team doesn't care...

A lot of the Democrat voters voted for Stein, Johnson or Trump. The people on the left who do vote knew Hillary is full of s**t. She is a two face flip flopper on issues. Bernie called her out on it. Yeah, they also blamed Bernie for damaging her image. She damaged her image way before Bernie declared for Presidency.

Hillary Clinton....Delusional is thy name.

Apparently she's still in the denial phase. Lots of more steps to go.

#schadenfreude
#gorsuch30years

Hillary Clinton emails containing classified information were forwarded to former congressman Anthony Weiner, the director of the FBI testified Wednesday
-- washington post

on the eve of director comey's testimony ...
the grand madam seeks the spotlight ...

STEP CURRY

What the what? Huma, you have some 'splainin' to do...

If true, there is not much subjectivity here. How is that not a violation of the statute? Forget intent and Crazy Anthony Wiener...if they were sent to anyone on this board it's a no-no.

(05-03-2017 11:28 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What the what? Huma, you have some 'splainin' to do...

If true, there is not much subjectivity here. How is that not a violation of the statute? Forget intent and Crazy Anthony Wiener...if they were sent to anyone on this board it's a no-no.

Comey is willing to put important politicians above the law.

Hillary Clinton To Launch New PAC…



The Loser’s Club.

Quote:Hillary Clinton is planning to soon launch a new political action committee without the intention of making another run for public office.

The failed 2016 Democratic presidential candidate will start the PAC to “act as a quiet catalyst” for organizations she supports and help 2018 congressional candidates, Axios reported Wednesday.

Clinton’s PAC will be focused on “lifting up organizations that are the product of the energy and activism she has seen since the election, and existing groups that have been reignited and reinvigorated by that energy,” a source familiar with the planning told Axios.

The source revealed that the PAC will not be a way for Clinton to comment on President Trump’s activities but also said she “won’t shy away from it.”

http://freebeacon.com/politics/hillary-c...h-new-pac/

(05-02-2017 09:37 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

Oodles. Thats brutal. Lol

(05-02-2017 07:55 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  She was on her way to winning in 2008 until Obama decided to run. Is she more bitter over her loss to Trump than Gore was losing to W? Can democrats no longer lose with dignity and class?

Those classes were cut for budgetary reasons.

(05-03-2017 04:06 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Hillary Clinton To Launch New PAC…



The Loser’s Club.

Quote:Hillary Clinton is planning to soon launch a new political action committee without the intention of making another run for public office.

The failed 2016 Democratic presidential candidate will start the PAC to “act as a quiet catalyst” for organizations she supports and help 2018 congressional candidates, Axios reported Wednesday.

Clinton’s PAC will be focused on “lifting up organizations that are the product of the energy and activism she has seen since the election, and existing groups that have been reignited and reinvigorated by that energy,” a source familiar with the planning told Axios.

The source revealed that the PAC will not be a way for Clinton to comment on President Trump’s activities but also said she “won’t shy away from it.”

http://freebeacon.com/politics/hillary-c...h-new-pac/

Will Foreigners be contributing to this new organization.

I just watched the whole interview. Suffice to say, it's now six months later and ABC News is still just as much in a state of shock, grief, denial, and depression as it was on the morning of 09th November.

Hillary! doesn't seem to be handling it too well, either.

(05-03-2017 10:09 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  I just watched the whole interview. Suffice to say, it's now six months later and ABC News is still just as much in a state of shock, grief, denial, and depression as it was on the morning of 09th November.

Hillary! doesn't seem to be handling it too well, either.

She is still depressed. Kind of tells you what a horrible choice she would be for president with so little resiliency.

Nate is still not over it either. He reveals his true blue colors saying it was Comey's fault-lots of really sloppy inside the bubble analysis (still trying to believe she would have won Arizona and North Carolina):

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the...-election/

Muh Nate is a confidence man.

(05-04-2017 01:04 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Muh Nate is a confidence man.

It became obvious to me that he is a deep blue inside the bubble Democrat when talking about Trump having a roughly 30% (don't remember his exact number, somewhere between 20% and 33%) chance of winning, he said, "I don't mean to scare anyone..."

That demonstrated that he didn't have the least bit of objectivity on the issue.