Activist Says Having ‘Genital Preferences’ In Dating Is Transphobic
Quote:Trans-activist Riley J. Dennis says having ‘genital preferences’ in dating is transphobic.
Yes, you read that correctly. If you’re a man who wants your woman to have a ****** you’re a bigot.
Dennis released a video at Everydayfeminist.com about his theory on “cissexism”, which he says is interchangeable with “transphobia” and means “prejudice or discrimination against trans people.”
My head is spinning. So, you’re born gay, you’re born trans, but no one is born straight. Straight people are just bigots.
Got it….I think.
To quote Dennis:
[People] might argue that being attracted to women without vaginas in no way negatively affects trans people, but on the other hand I would argue it’s more complicated than that. We all have our implicit biases built into our preferences and gender isn’t as simple as just the genitals you have.
Uh, no. It is exactly that simple. Do you science much, bro? Also, are we to believe trans people are the only humans without that implicit bias built into their preferences? If you’re a trans man who is only attracted to women with vaginas (I can’t believe I actually had to write that phrase) are you “cissexist” and “transphobic” as well?
Riley goes on to discuss the rebuttals to his “cissexism” argument, admitting that he has received many complaints from lesbians who claim he is engaging in “lesbian erasure”. He goes on to say that he doesn’t deny any lesbian the right to prefer vaginas but not all women have vaginas and if a lesbian denies that being attracted to a woman with a ***** is also a valid homosexual choice that is because she’s “cissexist”.
I’m not making this up. I wish I were, but I’m not. It took a great deal of effort to even type the previous paragraph, so I’ll stop here and let the rest of the video speak for itself. Be assured, it is just more of the same gobbly-gook.
Just to recap: This is a video of a man who thinks he is really a woman telling women to let men set the agenda for what qualifies as their womanhood.
RE: Activist Says Having ‘Genital Preferences’ In Dating Is Transphobic
Just perverted crap
Quote:A clip of Bill Nye’s latest television show promotes transgenderism and other gender identities as hard science, and it’s performing horribly on YouTube, as of Monday.
“My Sex Junk,” published on YouTube Sunday, features actress Rachel Bloom singing a song about transgenders, gay sex, and how sexuality is a fluid concept. The clip comes from an episode of Bill Nye’s show “Bill Nye Saves The World.”
“Sexuality’s a spectrum, everyone is on it. Even you might like it if you sit up on it,” Bloom sings on stage. “Drag king, drag queen just do what feels right.”
Bloom also delves into a bizarre chant where she laments a world in which you have only two choices between gender identity: male or female.
RE: Activist Says Having ‘Genital Preferences’ In Dating Is Transphobic
He goes on to say that he doesn’t deny any lesbian the right to prefer vaginas but not all women have vaginas and if a lesbian denies that being attracted to a woman with a *****
RE: Activist Says Having ‘Genital Preferences’ In Dating Is Transphobic
They're going to metaphorically cannibalize each other. How dare you tell a gay man that he's wrong for preferring his mate to have a *****! Seriously it started out as the gay and lesbian community trying to build their strength up by including another group. However, there comes a point where contradictions erupt. Bottom line is that trans is a disease. While I don't think it's been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that homosexuality has a genetic component, I can understand if it did. Trans - OTOH - is a bridge too far. It's contradictory.
RE: Activist Says Having ‘Genital Preferences’ In Dating Is Transphobic
I posted another comment but decided to delete because it could have been taken the wrong way.
What I was trying to say is that the LGBT community are finding any reason to claim they are being victimized. They concoct these silly microaggressions because they have pretty much gotten their way and no longer have any legal or moral obstacles to their choices, regardless what some posters try to have us believe. (The exception is that they still don't have free access to minor children.)
Continuing, I suggested that maybe if there were some real aggression against gays (like in the Muslim countries) they wouldn't have to manufacture imagined transgressions where none exist.
So until the LGBT can show evidence that gays are being persecuted, they're not getting my sympathy.