Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
UMD President says UNC should get the Death Penalty
Author Message
Pervis_Griffith Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,011
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 124
I Root For: Louisville
Location:
Post: #21
RE: UMD President says UNC should get the Death Penalty
(04-11-2017 02:40 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Many ESPN's talking heads have been calling for the death penalty for Penn State, North Carolina, Miami Florida, Ohio State and the latest, Baylor. These schools have become the most hated teams that people wish they be gone forever. It is one of the reasons why several G5 schools gain a lot of fans and good players lately. Nobody wants to say that they are a proud fan of any of these schools.


Uh ... yeah .. right. 01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle01-wingedeagle
04-11-2017 03:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chess Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,561
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 132
I Root For: ECU & Nebraska
Location: Chicagoland
Post: #22
RE: UMD President says UNC should get the Death Penalty
(04-11-2017 01:56 PM)GoldenWarrior11 Wrote:  I'd be curious to know what the ACC and UNC's peers think of this entire situation. Do they want this to go away, or would they find value in UNC being penalized for clearly taking advantage of academic standards?

Let's just make it clear that Clemson would not mind if UNC got harsh penalties. When Clemson was put on probation after the 1981 national championship, UNC led the ACC in giving extra penalties to Clemson.

South Carolina left the ACC because they felt UNC treated the school unfairly.

My feeling on the issue is simple- NC State quickly dealt with Jim Valvano and the NC State athletic department. The school raised the athletic standards to the highest in the ACC and, although the standards have been loosened, the school's athletic department has not recovered.

North Carolina needs to do the same. UNC is fighting this because the scandal goes all the way back to Dean Smith's final years and the Guttheridge years. UNC does not want to give up basketball national championships.
(This post was last modified: 04-11-2017 03:43 PM by chess.)
04-11-2017 03:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The Cutter of Bish Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,596
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 56
I Root For: the little guy
Location:
Post: #23
RE: UMD President says UNC should get the Death Penalty
(04-11-2017 12:08 PM)Wedge Wrote:  There's a reason that university presidents (as opposed to sportswriters or fans on internet message boards) don't usually say things like this out loud: When you're a university president and you say this, you've just handed out an invitation for people to investigate your own athletic department.

Give this man a chicken dinner.

Actually, I think I understand UMD's president now. He's an ***hole.
04-11-2017 03:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ColKurtz Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 59
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 13
I Root For: Virginia Tech
Location:
Post: #24
RE: UMD President says UNC should get the Death Penalty
(04-11-2017 03:42 PM)chess Wrote:  South Carolina left the ACC because they felt UNC treated the school unfairly.

USCe left the ACC due to academic issues. The ACC, at the time, had admission standards for athletes well above the NCAA standard. South Carolina didn't want to deal with that so they left. The ACC dropped those standards just a few years after that.
04-11-2017 04:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 12,920
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 596
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #25
RE: UMD President says UNC should get the Death Penalty
(04-11-2017 01:56 PM)GoldenWarrior11 Wrote:  I'd be curious to know what the ACC and UNC's peers think of this entire situation. Do they want this to go away, or would they find value in UNC being penalized for clearly taking advantage of academic standards?

The death of conference mates turning you in, and the death of the NCAA's teeth came with revenue sharing. If you turn Alabama in and they don't make the CFP then the conferences is out of a split of 80 million if they don't have another representative in the wings. If you are N.C. State and you turn in UNC you lose those tourney credits. Most commissioners now promote an all for one and one for all mentality between the schools. If somebody gets turned in it is by a member of another conference, or by a disgruntled donor or fan.

Right now North Carolina is the basketball bell cow of the ACC. Duke is still strong but fading a tad. Nobody in the ACC is going to rat on UNC at the administrative level.

Ole Miss would not have been in trouble except their own athletes flashed the cash on UTube and Facebook and a top draftee on NFL draft night talked about is impermissible benefits at Ole Miss. The SEC can't cover stupid!

The NCAA realizes that conference members are hard to nail down in testimony these days because it affects their bottom line in a revenue sharing conference.

Then enter the networks. Do you think for a minute that CBS, or ESPN, or FOX, or NBC wants to lose a top national brand's telecasts for a season or two, or lose out on their failure to appear in the post season? It affects their advertising rates which affects their pocket books. So don't look for ESPN to do a 20/20 piece on this that does anything but throw cover for the school.

The bigger the money got, and the more people who get a slice of the pie, the fewer folks there are that want to see sanctions.

Now enter the NCAA itself. Let's say that Kansas and North Carolina, and Michigan State all wound up on probation for recruiting violations. The NCAA banks nearly 70 million a year into their endowment from the tournament. Take a few national brands out of the tourney and voila advertisers balk about the rates because a large part of the national audience suddenly is less likely to tune in. Now for enforcing rules the NCAA may cut 10 million out of their own annual haul. Ain't happening!

The enforcement committee needs to be 100% independent of the NCAA and the schools other than the apportionment that each school must pay for the organization's fairness.
04-11-2017 04:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 20,794
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 380
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #26
RE: UMD President says UNC should get the Death Penalty
(04-11-2017 12:31 PM)arkstfan Wrote:  I have my doubts whether the NCAA rule book stretches far enough to cover what UNC did, but I agree with the sentiment.

Its a YUGE stretch to say it doesn't. These fake classes were set up and designed for athletes. Regular students were incidental. It is an attack on the whole idea of student-athlete. They didn't even set up "easy" classes. They had non-existent classes.
04-11-2017 04:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
goodknightfl Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,022
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 206
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #27
RE: UMD President says UNC should get the Death Penalty
UNC charlotte will pay the price for them.
04-11-2017 06:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ohio1317 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 4,938
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 145
I Root For: Ohio State
Location:
Post: #28
RE: UMD President says UNC should get the Death Penalty
Penalties always feel trivial when someone else is getting them and always feel overly harsh when it is your school. I despise the NCAA for a lot (it is a political organization essentially), but I do not think they under-punish.

I also think they should only be punishing for clear athletic violations. I very much disagreed with the Penn State punishment because it was stretch to say any of the problems were NCAA violations. They were worse than NCAA violations, but that that was something for the courts to handle. The NCAA itself had a very limited case against Penn State, but the powers-that-be wanted to show the NCAA had teeth and thus took extraordinary steps.
04-11-2017 09:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ohio1317 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 4,938
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 145
I Root For: Ohio State
Location:
Post: #29
RE: UMD President says UNC should get the Death Penalty
(04-11-2017 04:57 PM)bullet Wrote:  
(04-11-2017 12:31 PM)arkstfan Wrote:  I have my doubts whether the NCAA rule book stretches far enough to cover what UNC did, but I agree with the sentiment.

Its a YUGE stretch to say it doesn't. These fake classes were set up and designed for athletes. Regular students were incidental. It is an attack on the whole idea of student-athlete. They didn't even set up "easy" classes. They had non-existent classes.

If they are technically classes though (in the sense that is it possible for other people to sign up for and get same deal even if they aren't athletes), then that makes the NCAA case somewhat harder. While it might be true they were set-up with athletes in mind, the NCAA doesn't look at the rigor of classes.

On the flip side though, a North Carolina degree should be devalued by something like this, which is actually a far, far bigger issue for the school than NCAA issues. There might also be accreditation issues involved or something like that (again bigger issue than the NCAA).
04-11-2017 09:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rabonchild Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,038
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 38
I Root For: Charlotte
Location: Lex KY
Post: #30
RE: UMD President says UNC should get the Death Penalty
(04-11-2017 03:42 PM)chess Wrote:  
(04-11-2017 01:56 PM)GoldenWarrior11 Wrote:  I'd be curious to know what the ACC and UNC's peers think of this entire situation. Do they want this to go away, or would they find value in UNC being penalized for clearly taking advantage of academic standards?

Let's just make it clear that Clemson would not mind if UNC got harsh penalties. When Clemson was put on probation after the 1981 national championship, UNC led the ACC in giving extra penalties to Clemson.

South Carolina left the ACC because they felt UNC treated the school unfairly.

My feeling on the issue is simple- NC State quickly dealt with Jim Valvano and the NC State athletic department. The school raised the athletic standards to the highest in the ACC and, although the standards have been loosened, the school's athletic department has not recovered.

North Carolina needs to do the same. UNC is fighting this because the scandal goes all the way back to Dean Smith's final years and the Guttheridge years. UNC does not want to give up basketball national championships.


You sir are absolutely correct!!! UNC is a pus to the ACC, NCAA, & college sports. There should be a class action suite against the NCAA by the universities that been hurt by the NCAA while giving UNC a wink and a nod.
04-11-2017 10:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2017 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2017 MyBB Group.