(04-04-2017 07:06 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(04-04-2017 05:49 PM)Stugray2 Wrote:  Still no regents meeting on the docket and it's EOB in Kansas already. Check again in morning to see if something set.

You seem to be against anybody moving to different conferences. Including any new schools invited to the WAC.

Naysayers will be the death of college sports.

Personally, I'm all for the WAC adding as many schools as possible.

(04-05-2017 10:45 AM)Frank the Tank Wrote:  

(04-04-2017 07:06 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(04-04-2017 05:49 PM)Stugray2 Wrote:  Still no regents meeting on the docket and it's EOB in Kansas already. Check again in morning to see if something set.

You seem to be against anybody moving to different conferences. Including any new schools invited to the WAC.

Naysayers will be the death of college sports.

Personally, I'm all for the WAC adding as many schools as possible.

Limiting it to schools that are possible? Why, that seems like it puts you in amongst the naysayer crowd. DavidSt insists on imposing no such limitation.

(04-04-2017 11:11 PM)stever20 Wrote:  When something gets as far as this has gotten in the media, it's a done deal.

Except for Big 12 expansion last year

(04-04-2017 11:11 PM)stever20 Wrote:  When something gets as far as this has gotten in the media, it's a done deal.

the texahoma gang to the PAC 10 got pretty far. ESPN reported it. I haven't watched espn lately have the reported this?

(04-05-2017 10:12 PM)gosports1 Wrote:  

(04-04-2017 11:11 PM)stever20 Wrote:  When something gets as far as this has gotten in the media, it's a done deal.

the texahoma gang to the PAC 10 got pretty far. ESPN reported it. I haven't watched espn lately have the reported this?

If Sandra can get voted off Survivor, anything's possible.