(02-04-2018 04:35 PM)waltgreenberg Wrote:  

(02-04-2018 04:04 PM)ExcitedOwl18 Wrote:  They still have our old white jerseys because our brilliant AD decided that he would spend thousands of dollars on consultants to rebrand but then not give the equipment staff the budget they needed to replace both sets of jerseys in the same season.

Howeve, we’ll have rebranded whites by next fall.

The field (end zones in particular) also need to be rebranded.

Please quit posting outright misinformation (and I'm being kind with that word). As I and others posted when it occurred, the rebranding cost us nothing incremental. Zilch. The tab was part of our contract with Addidas.

But complaining is so much easier than truth — especially when you can insult someone in the process! What could be more fun than being self-righteous and lazy at the same time?

(02-04-2018 04:35 PM)waltgreenberg Wrote:  

(02-04-2018 04:04 PM)ExcitedOwl18 Wrote:  They still have our old white jerseys because our brilliant AD decided that he would spend thousands of dollars on consultants to rebrand but then not give the equipment staff the budget they needed to replace both sets of jerseys in the same season.

Howeve, we’ll have rebranded whites by next fall.

The field (end zones in particular) also need to be rebranded.

Please quit posting outright misinformation (and I'm being kind with that word). As I and others posted when it occurred, the rebranding cost us nothing incremental. Zilch. The tab was part of our contract with Addidas.

It is not outright misinformation that the football equipment staff was not given the budget to purchase new white jerseys.

(02-04-2018 04:35 PM)waltgreenberg Wrote:  

(02-04-2018 04:04 PM)ExcitedOwl18 Wrote:  They still have our old white jerseys because our brilliant AD decided that he would spend thousands of dollars on consultants to rebrand but then not give the equipment staff the budget they needed to replace both sets of jerseys in the same season.

Howeve, we’ll have rebranded whites by next fall.

The field (end zones in particular) also need to be rebranded.

Please quit posting outright misinformation (and I'm being kind with that word). As I and others posted when it occurred, the rebranding cost us nothing incremental. Zilch. The tab was part of our contract with Addidas.

Thanks for correcting this. I think it illustrates one weakness of not having a strong brand and control of it.

(02-04-2018 06:32 PM)ExcitedOwl18 Wrote:  

(02-04-2018 04:35 PM)waltgreenberg Wrote:  

(02-04-2018 04:04 PM)ExcitedOwl18 Wrote:  They still have our old white jerseys because our brilliant AD decided that he would spend thousands of dollars on consultants to rebrand but then not give the equipment staff the budget they needed to replace both sets of jerseys in the same season.

Howeve, we’ll have rebranded whites by next fall.

The field (end zones in particular) also need to be rebranded.

Please quit posting outright misinformation (and I'm being kind with that word). As I and others posted when it occurred, the rebranding cost us nothing incremental. Zilch. The tab was part of our contract with Addidas.

It is not outright misinformation that the football equipment staff was not given the budget to purchase new white jerseys.

I still don't like it. But who cares what I think.