Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
Author Message
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,524
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 971
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #41
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
(03-28-2017 01:00 PM)appst89 Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 12:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 12:51 PM)appst89 Wrote:  And the massive leftist temper tantrum continues. This is going to be a fun 8 years.

Dude, you and your buddies keep perpetuating this myth without ever showing how any poster here is losing their temper or throwing any sort of a tantrum?

Just citing facts and articulating our positions is not whining or crying any more than you falsely asserting that it is.

05-deadhorse

Right.

Well, I'm not seeing you cite any posts where anyone is throwing a temper tantrum now am I?
(This post was last modified: 03-28-2017 01:03 PM by Redwingtom.)
03-28-2017 01:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UTSAMarineVet09 Offline
Corporal of the Board.
*

Posts: 16,354
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
Post: #42
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
bahahahaha I guess according to the libtards on here, Apple and Steve Jobs are also a failure 03-lmfao
03-28-2017 01:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
appst89 Offline
Herding Cats
*

Posts: 2,816
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 484
I Root For: Appalachian St.
Location:
Post: #43
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
(03-28-2017 01:03 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 01:00 PM)appst89 Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 12:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 12:51 PM)appst89 Wrote:  And the massive leftist temper tantrum continues. This is going to be a fun 8 years.

Dude, you and your buddies keep perpetuating this myth without ever showing how any poster here is losing their temper or throwing any sort of a tantrum?

Just citing facts and articulating our positions is not whining or crying any more than you falsely asserting that it is.

05-deadhorse

Right.

Well, I'm not seeing you cite any posts where anyone is throwing a temper tantrum now am I?

Why would I? So you can continue to attack me for having an opinion that differs from yours? No thanks. 03-banghead03-banghead03-banghead
(This post was last modified: 03-28-2017 01:14 PM by appst89.)
03-28-2017 01:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hood-rich Offline
Smarter Than the Average Lib

Posts: 9,300
Joined: May 2016
I Root For: ECU & CSU
Location: The Hood
Post: #44
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
(03-28-2017 01:11 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  bahahahaha I guess according to the libtards on here, Apple and Steve Jobs are also a failure 03-lmfao
class envy. it's one of their oldest tricks.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
03-28-2017 01:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UTSAMarineVet09 Offline
Corporal of the Board.
*

Posts: 16,354
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
Post: #45
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
(03-28-2017 01:14 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 01:11 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  bahahahaha I guess according to the libtards on here, Apple and Steve Jobs are also a failure 03-lmfao
class envy. it's one of their oldest tricks.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Trump is even more successful than Hyundai
(This post was last modified: 03-28-2017 01:17 PM by UTSAMarineVet09.)
03-28-2017 01:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,524
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 971
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #46
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
(03-28-2017 01:11 PM)appst89 Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 01:03 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 01:00 PM)appst89 Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 12:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 12:51 PM)appst89 Wrote:  And the massive leftist temper tantrum continues. This is going to be a fun 8 years.

Dude, you and your buddies keep perpetuating this myth without ever showing how any poster here is losing their temper or throwing any sort of a tantrum?

Just citing facts and articulating our positions is not whining or crying any more than you falsely asserting that it is.

05-deadhorse

Right.

Well, I'm not seeing you cite any posts where anyone is throwing a temper tantrum now am I?

Why would I? So you can continue to attack me for having an opinion that differs from yours? No thanks.

Attack you? Where did I do that? I don't attack anyone on here for simply believing in a different ideology from mine. The only think I attack are attempts to distort facts or misrepresent the truth.

Show me an offending post and I'll gladly apologize if I unfairly attacked you.
03-28-2017 01:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
usmbacker Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 17,677
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 1320
I Root For: Beer
Location: Margaritaville
Post: #47
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
Los Angeles Vows To Fight Trump And Sessions On Sanctuary Status…

[Image: 11imhdk.jpg]

Keep dreaming

Quote:Responding to the latest warnings by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions that Department of Justice funds will be withheld from sanctuary cities, Mayor Eric Garcetti said Monday he will fight efforts by the Trump administration to take away federal funding needed for law enforcement in Los Angeles.

Garcetti said that such actions would be unconstitutional, adding that the city’s policies are “designed to keep our residents safe.”

“Slashing funds for first-responders, for our port and airport, for counterterrorism, crime-fighting and community-building serves no one — not this city, not the federal government, not the American people,” he said. “We will fight to protect the safety and dignity of all Angelenos, and we will work closely with our representatives in Congress to make sure that Los Angeles does not go without federal resources that help protect millions of people every day.”

Among the Justice Department grants received by the city of Los Angeles in recent years include $1.8 million from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program, which goes to the city’s initiative for reducing criminal gang activity.

http://www.dailynews.com/government-and-...ty-funding
03-28-2017 02:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,524
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 971
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #48
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
This will be another loser for Trump. Question though is when will he realize it.
03-28-2017 02:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
olliebaba Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 28,102
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation: 2151
I Root For: Christ
Location: El Paso
Post: #49
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
(03-28-2017 02:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This will be another loser for Trump. Question though is when will he realize it.

On this I don't agree. When it comes at the cost of federal funds the cities will realize they will lose. Withhold the funds and see how fast the idiot mayors will change their minds. Idiots, them and their constituents would rather protect illegal criminal invaders than their own voters. Where are the voters in these cities that don't agree with the mayors? Are they afraid of being labeled xenophobic? Screw that, what's right is right.
03-28-2017 03:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,524
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 971
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #50
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
(03-28-2017 03:02 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 02:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This will be another loser for Trump. Question though is when will he realize it.

On this I don't agree. When it comes at the cost of federal funds the cities will realize they will lose. Withhold the funds and see how fast the idiot mayors will change their minds. Idiots, them and their constituents would rather protect illegal criminal invaders than their own voters. Where are the voters in these cities that don't agree with the mayors? Are they afraid of being labeled xenophobic? Screw that, what's right is right.

The problem is that they won't be able to withhold the funds IMO. It will likely be deemed unconstitutional.

And you ask where are the people...I don't think immigration is the issue you (and Trump) think it is in these cities. It's mostly a scare the rural old timers that brownie is after you.

The ones who commit other crimes are dealt with for those crimes. I don't want my local law enforcement dollars going to enforce federal laws. There's more imporant things.

And yes, the illegals committing crimes is overblown.
(This post was last modified: 03-28-2017 03:30 PM by Redwingtom.)
03-28-2017 03:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hood-rich Offline
Smarter Than the Average Lib

Posts: 9,300
Joined: May 2016
I Root For: ECU & CSU
Location: The Hood
Post: #51
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
(03-28-2017 02:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This will be another loser for Trump. Question though is when will he realize it.

How? Most of the urban areas didn't vote for him anyway. The leeches will need to fund 100% of their light rail projects going forward.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
03-28-2017 03:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hood-rich Offline
Smarter Than the Average Lib

Posts: 9,300
Joined: May 2016
I Root For: ECU & CSU
Location: The Hood
Post: #52
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
(03-28-2017 03:27 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 03:02 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 02:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This will be another loser for Trump. Question though is when will he realize it.

On this I don't agree. When it comes at the cost of federal funds the cities will realize they will lose. Withhold the funds and see how fast the idiot mayors will change their minds. Idiots, them and their constituents would rather protect illegal criminal invaders than their own voters. Where are the voters in these cities that don't agree with the mayors? Are they afraid of being labeled xenophobic? Screw that, what's right is right.

The problem is that they won't be able to withhold the funds IMO. It will likely be deemed unconstitutional.

lol, where does the constitution say anything about giving money to municipalities?

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
03-28-2017 03:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,524
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 971
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #53
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
(03-28-2017 03:50 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 02:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This will be another loser for Trump. Question though is when will he realize it.

How? Most of the urban areas didn't vote for him anyway. The leeches will need to fund 100% of their light rail projects going forward.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Because he won't be able to withhold the funds. He'll try...and like health care...and travel ban...fail.
03-28-2017 03:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hood-rich Offline
Smarter Than the Average Lib

Posts: 9,300
Joined: May 2016
I Root For: ECU & CSU
Location: The Hood
Post: #54
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
(03-28-2017 03:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 03:50 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 02:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This will be another loser for Trump. Question though is when will he realize it.

How? Most of the urban areas didn't vote for him anyway. The leeches will need to fund 100% of their light rail projects going forward.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Because he won't be able to withhold the funds. He'll try...and like health care...and travel ban...fail.
Only if a leftist judge gets in the way, which he probably will. I will give you that. Let it go to the Supreme Court and I bet you the cities will lose. You and I shouldn't have to fund a light rail project in LA for example.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
03-28-2017 03:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
South Carolina Duke Offline
Banned

Posts: 6,011
Joined: Apr 2013
I Root For: James Madison
Location: Palmetto State
Post: #55
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
(03-28-2017 03:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 03:50 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 02:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This will be another loser for Trump. Question though is when will he realize it.

How? Most of the urban areas didn't vote for him anyway. The leeches will need to fund 100% of their light rail projects going forward.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Because he won't be able to withhold the funds. He'll try...and like health care...and travel ban...fail.

If these lib judges were made to stop writing law from the bench and let our legislators do there job we would have more law and order and a better country all together. But playing by the rules ain't the Liberal Way!
(This post was last modified: 03-28-2017 04:29 PM by South Carolina Duke.)
03-28-2017 04:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
usmbacker Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 17,677
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 1320
I Root For: Beer
Location: Margaritaville
Post: #56
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
Massachusetts Sheriff: Arrest Leaders Of Sanctuary Cities…

[Image: 2uo4282.jpg]

Sounds like a great idea.

Quote:A Massachusetts law enforcement official testifying before Congress on Tuesday called for leaders of sanctuary cities to be arrested.

Bristol County Sheriff Thomas Hodgson told the House Subcommittee on Illegal Immigration that sanctuary cities “have become magnets for illegal aliens, some of which have violent criminal records.”

“If these sanctuary cities are going to harbor and conceal criminal illegal aliens from ICE, which is in direct violation of Title 8 of the U.S. Code, federal arrest warrants should be issued for their elected officials,” Hodgson said. “Our citizens would be safer if we never stopped enforcing immigration law and if we never formed or turned a blind eye toward sanctuary cities.”

He also took aim at a Massachusetts legislator who passed along rumors of a planned ICE raid in Brockton on Tuesday and Wednesday.

Rep. Michelle DuBois, D-Brockton, warned her constituents in a Facebook post “if you are undocumented don’t go out on the street. If there is a knock on the door of your house and you don’t know who it is, don’t open the door.”

http://boston.cbslocal.com/2017/03/28/sh...migration/
03-28-2017 04:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kaplony Offline
Palmetto State Deplorable

Posts: 25,393
Joined: Apr 2013
I Root For: Newberry
Location: SC
Post: #57
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
(03-28-2017 03:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 03:50 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  
(03-28-2017 02:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This will be another loser for Trump. Question though is when will he realize it.

How? Most of the urban areas didn't vote for him anyway. The leeches will need to fund 100% of their light rail projects going forward.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Because he won't be able to withhold the funds. He'll try...and like health care...and travel ban...fail.

Disagree. The precedent for withholding funds is already there. It's how we ended up with the 55mph speed limit and the legal drinking age, the latter of which actually made it to the Supreme Court and found to be constitutional.
03-28-2017 04:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JMUDunk Offline
Rootin' fer Dukes, bud
*

Posts: 29,501
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 1724
I Root For: Freedom
Location: Shmocation
Post: #58
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
(03-27-2017 03:24 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-27-2017 03:19 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  
(03-27-2017 02:39 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  
(03-27-2017 02:17 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-27-2017 02:11 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Illegal. That means not legal

Right...illegal immigrants are not here legally. Now, can you answer the question. How are sanctuary cities breaking the law?

They can't answer your question. Your question is to advanced for the Trump brain.

The cities themselves aren't technically breaking the law, but a good lawyer could argue that they are accessories after the fact. If local government knows the location of illegal immigrants and refuses to share that knowledge with Immigration, they are essentially harboring people who are here illegally. Even if these illegal immigrants are arrested or ticketed. Also, these cities offer social services to illegal immigrants, which is the worst possible thing you can do.

"If you give a mouse a cookie..."

Cut their funding. Let them feed, shelter, and harbor illegal immigrants on their own dime, and see how long that lasts.

Not so much. As long as the locals don't ask for the immigration status, they've done nothing wrong. It's not their job to enforce federal laws.


Uh, if the locals don't about their immigration status (for a reasonable reason) they're doing their job wrong.
03-28-2017 04:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DavidSt Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,011
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 732
I Root For: ATU, P7
Location:
Post: #59
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
Crack down on sanctuary colleges and universities by not funding them as well.

Dartmouth
Florida State
Ohio U.
Rutgers
St, Mary's
Stanford
Texas State
Texas Women
University of Illinois
Ole Miss.
New Mexico
North Texas
Penn
San Diego
Vanderbilt
Yale
Portland State
Drake
Cal. State System
Iowa State
U. Cal. System
Emory students voted for that school to be a sanctuary campus.



Boston U., UNLV, Towson and Texas A&M could become one.
03-28-2017 07:26 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EverRespect Offline
Free Kaplony
*

Posts: 31,322
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1156
I Root For: ODU
Location:
Post: #60
RE: Sessions takes aim at 'dangerous' sanctuary cities, warns on funding
The one way dems can stop it is by allocating the spending to sanctuary cities through congresss. As of now, it is executive discretionary spending not mandated. I don't even think Ruth Bader Ginsburg can slime her way into another opinion.

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk
03-28-2017 07:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.