Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
Author Message
billybobby777 Offline
Fighting the cartel 5
*

Posts: 6,128
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 245
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
Post: #21
RE: 2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
(03-18-2017 12:18 PM)JRsec Wrote:  The number by the school is it's national position. But I have broken them out by P conference / independents / and hopefuls.

ACC
17. Florida State-123,344,314
20. Louisville-112,146,501
27. Virginia-100,632,895
30. Clemson-95,800,326
37. Duke-91,971,836
40. North Carolina-90,969,518
43. Miami-85,615,972
46. Virginia Tech-84,064,779
47. Syracuse-82,676,841
49. N.C. State-80,255,029
60. Pittsburgh-71,314,082
62. Boston College-71,314,082 P5 schools earning below 65th position
66. Georgia Tech-62,260,693
67. Wake Forest-62053,971

ACC Conference Mean: $87,034,205


Big 10
02. Ohio State-169,904,847
05. Michigan-146,219,589
11. Penn State-132,306,528
13. Wisconsin-130,045,544
19. Iowa-117,002,340
22. Nebraska-109,967,175
23. Minnesota-107,705,479
26. Michigan State-100,914,623
32. Maryland-94,101,697
33. Indiana-93,938,599
51. Rutgers-78,845,894
53. Purdue-78,517,673
54. Illinois-78,395,389
57. Northwestern-77,906,464

Big 10 Conference Mean: $108,269,417


Big 12
01. Texas-182,104,126
04. Oklahoma-150,371,578
31. Kansas-94,697,418
34. T.C.U.-93,259,382
39. West Virginia-91,412,352
41. Baylor-90,769,041
42. Oklahoma State-90,049,297
55. Iowa State-78,355,500
56. Kansas State-77,936,660
61. Texas Tech-72,750,020

Big 12 Conference Mean: $102,170,537


PAC
21. Stanford-112,036,255
24. Washington-107,154,560
25. U.S.C.-106,195,078
28. U.C.L.A.-98,913,023
35. Oregon-92,375,046
36. Arizona State-92,146,148
45. California-84,200,594
48. Arizona-81,279,425
58. Oregon State-77,667,685
59. Colorado-77,276,890
63. Washington State-71,285,725
64. Utah-70,346,405

PAC Conference Mean: $89,239,736


SEC
03. Alabama-164,005,589
06. L.S.U.-141,456,764
07. Auburn-140,070,592
08. Tennessee-135,949,847
10. Florida-134,033,664
12. Texas A&M-131,045,544
14. Arkansas-127,316,374
15. Kentucky-124,006,908
16. Georgia-123,841,268
18. South Carolina-122,331,092
29. Mississippi-98,377,760
38. Missouri-91,573,174
44. Mississippi State-84,564,899
52. Vanderbilt-78,793,574

SEC Conference Mean: $121,240,504

Independents and G5 schools in the top 65:

09. Notre Dame-134,211,095
50. Connecticut-79,267,924
65. Brigham Young-62,563279

Best of the G5:
68. Southern Methodist-56,909,280
69. Tulane-53,141,211
70. Central Florida-52,317,442
71. Houston-50,886,777
72. Temple-50,886,490
73. Memphis-49,849,343
74. South Florida-48,405,192
75. San Diego St.-46,683,110
76. Cincinnati-43,367,493
77. East Carolina-43,045,337
78. Hawaii-41,997,257
79. Freson State-41,892,171
80. Tulsa-40,465,787

Everyone else earns below $40,000,000.

Conference Mean Earning Rankings:
1. SEC: $121,240,504
2. Big 10: $108,269,417
3. Big 12: $102,170,537
4. PAC: $89,239,736
5. ACC: $87,034,205

Conference breakdown by School Revenue
100,000,000 plus: SEC-10, Big 10-8, ACC-3, PAC-3, Big 12-2
90,000,000 plus: Big 12-5, ACC-3, PAC-3, SEC-2, Big 10-2
80,000,000 plus: ACC-4, PAC-2, SEC-1, Big 10-0, Big 12-0
70,000,000 plus: PAC-4, Big 10-4, Big 12-3, ACC-2, SEC-1
60,000,000 plus: ACC-2

Would you please list the subsidy of Rutgers next to their "budget" of 78 million. Keep in mind most power schools have 0 in subsidies. $0. How much of that 78 million athletic budget listed by Rutgers is subsidized? 5%? 10%? 75%?
Cheers!
03-18-2017 10:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
billybobby777 Offline
Fighting the cartel 5
*

Posts: 6,128
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 245
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
Post: #22
RE: 2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
(03-18-2017 08:37 PM)Bigdog731 Wrote:  I think the great divide is in the overall subsides the schools outside of the G5 receive in terms of percentage of athletic budget. Those numbers are absolutely staggering. The G5 (for the most part) schools could trim fat and run with zero subsidies if it were to actually ever come to that...the ones outside of the G5 would be in big trouble without the subsidy.

Yep. SEE RUTGERS.

Cheers!
03-18-2017 10:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MplsBison Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,985
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 159
I Root For: NDSU/Minnesota
Location:
Post: #23
RE: 2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
(03-18-2017 05:01 PM)CougarRed Wrote:  The marginal cost is almost nil aside from room and board.

Every school is different, to be sure. But at least the two schools I'm familiar with ... most non-freshman live in off-campus housing.

And the game has been completely turned on its head, with regards to food. At least in the FBS (and should be all of DI, as far as I'm concerned), schools are allowed to make unlimited "gifts" to student-athletes in terms of food. As much as they want to spend on a food budget, they're allowed to do that. Hire nutritionists and chefs, run entire athlete-only dining centers, etc. Some schools have already been doing that for a while.


(03-18-2017 05:01 PM)CougarRed Wrote:  But those are the rules of the game.

What rules?

Title IX has nothing to do with money. Only participation. That's why such a large chunk of the EiA data is concerning participation numbers relative to male/female full-time undergraduate enrollment.
03-19-2017 10:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2017 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2017 MyBB Group.