Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)
Open TigerLinks
 

Post Reply 
University plans iconic bridge
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
airric2255 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 569
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 28
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Memphis, TN
Post: #21
RE: University plans iconic bridge
(03-15-2017 02:22 PM)FlyingTiger2016 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 02:12 PM)airric2255 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 01:18 PM)btiger Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 01:13 PM)VinnieVegas Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 01:10 PM)btiger Wrote:  that's why we're not getting an indoor practice facility


How dare the university put student safety over football. Maybe this is why we won't ever be in a P5 conference.



im not offering commentary....just stating facts

So, Rudd and Bowen both are blowing smoke about it being moved into the next budget year and be approved by the new UofM board instead of the previous board of regents?

If true and based on where the sports are today, looks like the IPF facility should have been prioritized over the new basketball facility.

The miserables are out in force today. The land bridge has nothing to do with the IPF. Please stop spreading FUD. IPF is paid for by donations. The land bridge is getting builtwith student fees.

Your arguments don't make sense. Rudd can't just shift money around all crazy.

Unsure who you are directing this at, but to be clear I know exactly where the money comes from for the bball facility and IPF as I donated to the campaign.

My comments were specifically aimed to prompt a response from our good friend "b" as to where he got his facts from.
03-15-2017 04:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
FlyingTiger2016 Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 472
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 29
I Root For: Memphis/GaTech
Location:
Post: #22
RE: University plans iconic bridge
(03-15-2017 04:25 PM)airric2255 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 02:22 PM)FlyingTiger2016 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 02:12 PM)airric2255 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 01:18 PM)btiger Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 01:13 PM)VinnieVegas Wrote:  How dare the university put student safety over football. Maybe this is why we won't ever be in a P5 conference.



im not offering commentary....just stating facts

So, Rudd and Bowen both are blowing smoke about it being moved into the next budget year and be approved by the new UofM board instead of the previous board of regents?

If true and based on where the sports are today, looks like the IPF facility should have been prioritized over the new basketball facility.

The miserables are out in force today. The land bridge has nothing to do with the IPF. Please stop spreading FUD. IPF is paid for by donations. The land bridge is getting builtwith student fees.

Your arguments don't make sense. Rudd can't just shift money around all crazy.

Unsure who you are directing this at, but to be clear I know exactly where the money comes from for the bball facility and IPF as I donated to the campaign.

My comments were specifically aimed to prompt a response from our good friend "b" as to where he got his facts from.

Same. My comments were addressed to btiger. My fault for the confusion.
03-15-2017 04:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SNF6 Offline
Go To Hell Ole Miss

Posts: 5,078
Joined: Oct 2005
I Root For: Vol Free USA
Location: The Shaven, MS
Post: #23
RE: University plans iconic bridge
(03-15-2017 04:26 PM)FlyingTiger2016 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 04:25 PM)airric2255 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 02:22 PM)FlyingTiger2016 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 02:12 PM)airric2255 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 01:18 PM)btiger Wrote:  im not offering commentary....just stating facts

So, Rudd and Bowen both are blowing smoke about it being moved into the next budget year and be approved by the new UofM board instead of the previous board of regents?

If true and based on where the sports are today, looks like the IPF facility should have been prioritized over the new basketball facility.

The miserables are out in force today. The land bridge has nothing to do with the IPF. Please stop spreading FUD. IPF is paid for by donations. The land bridge is getting builtwith student fees.

Your arguments don't make sense. Rudd can't just shift money around all crazy.

Unsure who you are directing this at, but to be clear I know exactly where the money comes from for the bball facility and IPF as I donated to the campaign.

My comments were specifically aimed to prompt a response from our good friend "b" as to where he got his facts from.

Same. My comments were addressed to btiger. My fault for the confusion.

He doesn't care about facts, just yanking his crank under his desk as people reply to his crap. B is B.. always has been. Has "friends" on here that think the chit is funny, and the certain mods are in debt to certain people.....or family.
03-15-2017 04:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tiger87 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,847
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 206
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #24
RE: University plans iconic bridge
(03-15-2017 04:33 PM)SNF6 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 04:26 PM)FlyingTiger2016 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 04:25 PM)airric2255 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 02:22 PM)FlyingTiger2016 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 02:12 PM)airric2255 Wrote:  So, Rudd and Bowen both are blowing smoke about it being moved into the next budget year and be approved by the new UofM board instead of the previous board of regents?

If true and based on where the sports are today, looks like the IPF facility should have been prioritized over the new basketball facility.

The miserables are out in force today. The land bridge has nothing to do with the IPF. Please stop spreading FUD. IPF is paid for by donations. The land bridge is getting builtwith student fees.

Your arguments don't make sense. Rudd can't just shift money around all crazy.

Unsure who you are directing this at, but to be clear I know exactly where the money comes from for the bball facility and IPF as I donated to the campaign.

My comments were specifically aimed to prompt a response from our good friend "b" as to where he got his facts from.

Same. My comments were addressed to btiger. My fault for the confusion.

He doesn't care about facts, just yanking his crank under his desk as people reply to his crap. B is B.. always has been. Has "friends" on here that think the chit is funny, and the certain mods are in debt to certain people.....or family.

Interesting. [sound = things clicking into place]
03-15-2017 08:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tiger87 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,847
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 206
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #25
RE: University plans iconic bridge
(03-15-2017 01:10 PM)VinnieVegas Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 12:38 PM)3601 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 12:29 PM)VinnieVegas Wrote:  Maybe we can get Calipari to come back now ?

[Image: trump4.jpg]

What? I thought the railroad track is why he left? Sorry I get all these message board myths confused.

Nah. It's because all we eat with is plasticware.
03-15-2017 08:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tiger87 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,847
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 206
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #26
RE: University plans iconic bridge
(03-15-2017 02:16 PM)VinnieVegas Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 02:12 PM)airric2255 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 01:18 PM)btiger Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 01:13 PM)VinnieVegas Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 01:10 PM)btiger Wrote:  that's why we're not getting an indoor practice facility


How dare the university put student safety over football. Maybe this is why we won't ever be in a P5 conference.



im not offering commentary....just stating facts

So, Rudd and Bowen both are blowing smoke about it being moved into the next budget year and be approved by the new UofM board instead of the previous board of regents?

If true and based on where the sports are today, looks like the IPF facility should have been prioritized over the new basketball facility.

Maybe a certain booster earmarked his own money for the basketball facility ?

But I thought no one cared about basketball any longer, and all the money was going to football? This is all very confusing.
03-15-2017 08:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
btiger Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,884
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 432
I Root For:
Location:

CrappiesDonators
Post: #27
RE: University plans iconic bridge
(03-15-2017 04:33 PM)SNF6 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 04:26 PM)FlyingTiger2016 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 04:25 PM)airric2255 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 02:22 PM)FlyingTiger2016 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 02:12 PM)airric2255 Wrote:  So, Rudd and Bowen both are blowing smoke about it being moved into the next budget year and be approved by the new UofM board instead of the previous board of regents?

If true and based on where the sports are today, looks like the IPF facility should have been prioritized over the new basketball facility.

The miserables are out in force today. The land bridge has nothing to do with the IPF. Please stop spreading FUD. IPF is paid for by donations. The land bridge is getting builtwith student fees.

Your arguments don't make sense. Rudd can't just shift money around all crazy.

Unsure who you are directing this at, but to be clear I know exactly where the money comes from for the bball facility and IPF as I donated to the campaign.

My comments were specifically aimed to prompt a response from our good friend "b" as to where he got his facts from.

Same. My comments were addressed to btiger. My fault for the confusion.

He doesn't care about facts, just yanking his crank under his desk as people reply to his crap. B is B.. always has been. Has "friends" on here that think the chit is funny, and the certain mods are in debt to certain people.....or family.

reported
03-16-2017 09:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
VinnieVegas Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 780
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 34
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Las Vegas
Post: #28
RE: University plans iconic bridge
(03-15-2017 08:55 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 02:16 PM)VinnieVegas Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 02:12 PM)airric2255 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 01:18 PM)btiger Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 01:13 PM)VinnieVegas Wrote:  How dare the university put student safety over football. Maybe this is why we won't ever be in a P5 conference.



im not offering commentary....just stating facts

So, Rudd and Bowen both are blowing smoke about it being moved into the next budget year and be approved by the new UofM board instead of the previous board of regents?

If true and based on where the sports are today, looks like the IPF facility should have been prioritized over the new basketball facility.

Maybe a certain booster earmarked his own money for the basketball facility ?

But I thought no one cared about basketball any longer, and all the money was going to football? This is all very confusing.

Maybe he don't now after he donated all that money only to see the team miss the NCAA for 3 straight years?
03-16-2017 09:41 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tgrrfan Offline
Which way is she turning?
*

Posts: 3,047
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 114
I Root For: Memphis & ND
Location:
Post: #29
RE: University plans iconic bridge
(03-15-2017 02:12 PM)airric2255 Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 01:18 PM)btiger Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 01:13 PM)VinnieVegas Wrote:  
(03-15-2017 01:10 PM)btiger Wrote:  that's why we're not getting an indoor practice facility


How dare the university put student safety over football. Maybe this is why we won't ever be in a P5 conference.



im not offering commentary....just stating facts

So, Rudd and Bowen both are blowing smoke about it being moved into the next budget year and be approved by the new UofM board instead of the previous board of regents?

If true and based on where the sports are today, looks like the IPF facility should have been prioritized over the new basketball facility.

Why? Basketball has traditionally made money, enough money to support football. Football has never made a dime. Why make cuts to your only profit making business model? 05-stirthepot
03-16-2017 11:04 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
wylioats Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,852
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 425
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location:
Post: #30
RE: University plans iconic bridge
(03-15-2017 01:10 PM)btiger Wrote:  that's why we're not getting an indoor practice facility


I'm just curious as to how many fish will bite on this. b, Bill Dance ain't got chit on you. 04-bow
03-16-2017 12:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

 photo cincinnati_zps9480552d.png  photo connecticut_zpsb68d2b67.png  photo east_carolina_zpsa65020be.png  photo houston_zps11e4d10c.png  photo memphis_zps0fa8713b.png  photo navy_zpsd0ae7ad3.png  photo smu_zps73d3cd0d.png  photo temple_zpsa362ff56.png  photo tulane_zps1023bc48.png  photo tulsa_zps61b051fb.png  photo ucf_zps3426b631.png  photo usf_zpsd5b72f21.png


Copyright © 2002-2017 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2017 MyBB Group.
MemphisTigers.org is the number one message board for Memphis Tigers sports.