Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
What A Difference the Newbies Make
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
jaminandjachin Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,108
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 53
I Root For: UNC
Location:
Post: #11
RE: What A Difference the Newbies Make
(03-13-2017 04:17 PM)ClemVegas Wrote:  ok, no need to continue discussing it.

Clemson did make an elite 8 in the late 90s sometime, lost to Bobby Jackson's Minnesota team.

That was 1997 and it was the Sweet 16. Regardless, still not the Final Four. You can complain about Cuse in football, but basketball, you need to take a step back.
03-13-2017 04:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ClemVegas Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,271
Joined: Jul 2015
I Root For: Clemson
Location:
Post: #12
RE: What A Difference the Newbies Make
I'm not complaining about Cuse football or basketball. and I have no problem with Cuse losing in football.

I just don't think a team that probably shouldn't have made the tourney last year making the final 4 after playing 3 non-P5 programs is that impressive. they lost to most of the good teams they played last year.

i would say overall the former big east programs have declined since entering the ACC. ND has been better.

i think the former big east teams would be better off from basketball recruiting standpoint if they stayed in big east. that's basically what the Cuse coach thinks given his comments about Gboro and NYC.

looks like ACC is verge of Civil War. lol Secession looms.
(This post was last modified: 03-13-2017 04:39 PM by ClemVegas.)
03-13-2017 04:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jaminandjachin Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,108
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 53
I Root For: UNC
Location:
Post: #13
RE: What A Difference the Newbies Make
(03-13-2017 04:25 PM)ClemVegas Wrote:  I'm not complaining about Cuse football or basketball. and I have no problem with Cuse losing in football.

I just don't think a team that probably shouldn't have made the tourney last year making the final 4 after playing 3 non-P5 programs is that impressive. they lost to most of the good teams they played last year.

i would say overall the former big east programs have declined since entering the ACC. ND has been better.

i think the former big east teams would be better off from basketball recruiting standpoint if they stayed in big east.

Once again, it doesn't matter if you played 4 non P5 teams on the way to the Final 4. You still made the Final Four. In doing so, Syracuse became the first 10 seed to make it that far. Tournament has been going on for decades and many teams have had opportunities to take advantage of bracket breakdowns.

As for the newbies...ND has gotten better. Louisville is about the same. Syracuse is about the same. Pitt got worse.
03-13-2017 04:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ClemVegas Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,271
Joined: Jul 2015
I Root For: Clemson
Location:
Post: #14
RE: What A Difference the Newbies Make
ok, if I am making a case the conference has become stronger, I would do it based on overall resume, not a random final 4 by bubble team. i'm not taking anything away from Cuse's run last year.

i don't recall Cuse being an annual bubble team in the Big East.
(This post was last modified: 03-13-2017 04:42 PM by ClemVegas.)
03-13-2017 04:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jaminandjachin Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,108
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 53
I Root For: UNC
Location:
Post: #15
RE: What A Difference the Newbies Make
(03-13-2017 04:41 PM)ClemVegas Wrote:  ok, if I am making a case the conference has become stronger, I would do it based on overall resume, not a random final 4 by bubble team. i'm not taking anything away from Cuse's run last year.

i don't recall Cuse being an annual bubble team in the Big East.

You do realize they're on scholarship restrictions right? They were 28-6 in their first season in the ACC. The second year they were ineligible and that's when the penalties got handed down. That's the main reason why they've taken a dip. Truth be told, Syracuse had some NIT years in the Big East too.
03-13-2017 04:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Lenvillecards Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,154
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation: 282
I Root For: Louisville
Location:
Post: #16
What A Difference the Newbies Make
(03-13-2017 04:45 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  
(03-13-2017 04:41 PM)ClemVegas Wrote:  ok, if I am making a case the conference has become stronger, I would do it based on overall resume, not a random final 4 by bubble team. i'm not taking anything away from Cuse's run last year.

i don't recall Cuse being an annual bubble team in the Big East.

You do realize they're on scholarship restrictions right? They were 28-6 in their first season in the ACC. The second year they were ineligible and that's when the penalties got handed down. That's the main reason why they've taken a dip. Truth be told, Syracuse had some NIT years in the Big East too.

Not to mention that JB has announced that he will be retiring no later than the end of next season. That also hurts recruiting.
03-13-2017 05:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
nzmorange Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,586
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 247
I Root For: UAB
Location:
Post: #17
RE: What A Difference the Newbies Make
(03-13-2017 04:17 PM)ClemVegas Wrote:  ok, no need to continue discussing it. reason I posted in somebody had said on another topic that Cuse making the final 4 last year was more impressiive than winning the ACC tournament. I think what Duke did this week is far more impressive than Cuse last year.

Clemson did make an elite 8 in the late 90s sometime, lost to Bobby Jackson's Minnesota team.

Perspective: a UNC fan is arguing with you about your stupid anti-Syracuse bias.

Let it go, man. Life is too short.
03-13-2017 08:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ClemVegas Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,271
Joined: Jul 2015
I Root For: Clemson
Location:
Post: #18
RE: What A Difference the Newbies Make
how is it anti-Syracuse to not be impressed by a team beating 3 non power 5 programs in the big dance and then squeaking out a win over UVA, before being blown out by UNC?

i would have the same view regardless of the team who did this.

i would say Clemson's run last year in the ACC, with wins over Duke, Pitt, Miami, and some other team, was more impressive.
(This post was last modified: 03-13-2017 08:35 PM by ClemVegas.)
03-13-2017 08:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
nzmorange Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,586
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 247
I Root For: UAB
Location:
Post: #19
RE: What A Difference the Newbies Make
(03-13-2017 08:34 PM)ClemVegas Wrote:  how is it anti-Syracuse to not be impressed by a team beating 3 non power 5 programs in the big dance and then squeaking out a win over UVA, before being blown out by UNC?

i would have the same view regardless of the team who did this.

i would say Clemson's run last year in the ACC, with wins over Duke, Pitt, Miami, and some other team, was more impressive.

How many posts in this thread alone do you have trying to diminish SU's FF run?

I get that you're upset that Jimmy hurt your feelings. You've made that abundantly clear, but give it up. You've hit the point where you're literally arguing w/ everyone on the board, regardless of their team affiliation.

I really, really don't want to put someone on an ignore list, but you're getting painful. There's no possible way you can derive joy out of being so miserable. In addition to being generally right, Jim is a grumpy old man who is upset that the Denny's closed. Don't let him get to you.
03-13-2017 09:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ClemVegas Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,271
Joined: Jul 2015
I Root For: Clemson
Location:
Post: #20
RE: What A Difference the Newbies Make
put me on your ignore list, homey. it is not my fault if you take it personally that I don't think Cuse's run last year was super impressive given the teams they played. I'm also not an ACC cheerleader except maybe against SEC in football.

i'm only arguing with people who attack me, and it is with people that I have a history with. Losers that run to the moderator if you say something they don't like. i think reason this forum is so inactive is it is over-moderated, or was in the past. everytime i come on here, it is the same few people basically having the same conversations usually about $$$$$.

In over-moderated forums, the regular posters have a lot of power, they can gang up on newcomers and get them banned. they enjoy this process. but it is a reason the forum audience never grows.

SEC rant has incredible traffic and i see new people on there everytime I post. it isn't heavily moderated. the crazy thing is I have better ACC sports discussions on there than here.
(This post was last modified: 03-13-2017 10:14 PM by ClemVegas.)
03-13-2017 09:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2017 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2017 MyBB Group.