(03-01-2017 10:34 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 09:41 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  I'm no fan of Sessions, but I don't see a problem with this. I'd rather it have been Rex Tillerson that had contact with the ambassador. This to me seems to nitpicking when we really don't have to be.

honestly what does it take to be a fan of sessions?

Rational thought, critical thinking....
Loretta Lynch, lmao. Indignation does not become you

(03-01-2017 10:44 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 10:34 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 09:41 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  I'm no fan of Sessions, but I don't see a problem with this. I'd rather it have been Rex Tillerson that had contact with the ambassador. This to me seems to nitpicking when we really don't have to be.

honestly what does it take to be a fan of sessions?

Rational thought, critical thinking....
Loretta Lynch, lmao. Indignation does not become you

I'm unsure how busting up legalized pot across the country is rational.

(03-01-2017 10:46 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 10:44 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 10:34 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 09:41 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  I'm no fan of Sessions, but I don't see a problem with this. I'd rather it have been Rex Tillerson that had contact with the ambassador. This to me seems to nitpicking when we really don't have to be.

honestly what does it take to be a fan of sessions?

Rational thought, critical thinking....
Loretta Lynch, lmao. Indignation does not become you

I'm unsure how busting up legalized pot across the country is rational.

Well you can disagree but it still has a rational basis.

I lived across the street from a senator who is gonna do time for graft and corruption, even talked to him. I've yet to be investigated.

Not seeing how eliminating millions in tax revenue that goes towards education and infrastructure is rational.

(03-01-2017 10:52 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  Not seeing how eliminating millions in tax revenue that goes towards education and infrastructure is rational.

Hey man, dont have all the answers. Lol. My brother and I know everything though. That one is on him.

Failing Washington Post

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using CSNbbs mobile app

(03-01-2017 10:44 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 10:34 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 09:41 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  I'm no fan of Sessions, but I don't see a problem with this. I'd rather it have been Rex Tillerson that had contact with the ambassador. This to me seems to nitpicking when we really don't have to be.

honestly what does it take to be a fan of sessions?

Rational thought, critical thinking....
Loretta Lynch, lmao. Indignation does not become you

so you can't construct a real argument.

got it.

This Russian diplomat that Sessions met is known in the CIA and all that as a known spy for Russia. Does not look good right now. If Lynch met with lets say the dear leader of North Korea? You all would be howling at the moon for her to resign. Sessions need to resign.

(03-01-2017 11:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 10:44 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 10:34 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 09:41 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  I'm no fan of Sessions, but I don't see a problem with this. I'd rather it have been Rex Tillerson that had contact with the ambassador. This to me seems to nitpicking when we really don't have to be.

honestly what does it take to be a fan of sessions?

Rational thought, critical thinking....
Loretta Lynch, lmao. Indignation does not become you

so you can't construct a real argument.

got it.

You cant pose a legitimate question. Always some leading hyper partisan absurdity. You get what you need.

if "tell me why you support this guy" isn't a legitimate question then good grief.

(03-01-2017 11:17 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 11:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 10:44 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 10:34 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 09:41 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  I'm no fan of Sessions, but I don't see a problem with this. I'd rather it have been Rex Tillerson that had contact with the ambassador. This to me seems to nitpicking when we really don't have to be.

honestly what does it take to be a fan of sessions?

Rational thought, critical thinking....
Loretta Lynch, lmao. Indignation does not become you

so you can't construct a real argument.

got it.

You cant pose a legitimate question. Always some leading hyper partisan absurdity. You get what you need.

Is you're signature in Russian.

(03-01-2017 11:19 PM)john01992 Wrote:  if "tell me why you support this guy" isn't a legitimate question then good grief.

Honestly. I don't care what you think or discern from this board anymore. You should probably put me on ignore. Your argumentative method is tired, parochial, full of fallacies of logic and usually circular. I am.not compelled you enlighten you. Best wishes. Apologies for even responding to anything you post.

(03-01-2017 10:52 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  Not seeing how eliminating millions in tax revenue that goes towards education and infrastructure is rational.

oh so you want to tax it? eff that.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

(03-01-2017 11:21 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 11:17 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 11:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 10:44 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 10:34 PM)john01992 Wrote:  honestly what does it take to be a fan of sessions?

Rational thought, critical thinking....
Loretta Lynch, lmao. Indignation does not become you

so you can't construct a real argument.

got it.

You cant pose a legitimate question. Always some leading hyper partisan absurdity. You get what you need.

Is you're signature in Russian.

Neyt

(03-01-2017 11:30 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-01-2017 11:19 PM)john01992 Wrote:  if "tell me why you support this guy" isn't a legitimate question then good grief.

Honestly. I don't care what you think or discern from this board anymore. You should probably put me on ignore. Your argumentative method is tired, parochial, full of fallacies of logic and usually circular. I am.not compelled you enlighten you. Best wishes. Apologies for even responding to anything you post.

so you can't construct a legitimate argument about why you support this guy.

(03-01-2017 09:34 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  He met with the Russian ambassador twice during campaign? Why? I'm starting to see Russians in my sleep. They've infiltrated our system. There's too much smoke for there not to be a fire.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat...76f0bb2a2a

You're Soooo 80's, Dad. Eeeeewww.

C'mon.

"BHO, circa 2012".

Sessions perjured himself at 2:13.

Will he be forced to resign?



https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4644049/a...f-sessions

Pretty gray area. I'm guessing both sides just ***** at each other for a week.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using CSNbbs mobile app

(03-02-2017 06:50 AM)fsquid Wrote:  Pretty gray area.

Sessions didn't think so in 1998:

“I have no doubt that perjury qualifies under the Constitution as a high crime. It goes to the heart of the judicial system.”

or in 1999:

“I hope we haven't sent a message that’s not as clear,” he said, “that clever people can sometimes get ahead by spinning and not telling the truth. That worries me.”

But her e-mails in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...

My takes are (1) I hope Trump enjoyed his one day bump; (2) Sessions will be fine but he is going to have to recuse himself from any inquiries into the connections between Trump and Russia; and (3) Every PR person in DC is a fool as Session's statement certainly makes things worse - it says that he never met with Russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign when the initial issue was just him meeting with Russian officials period and not disclosing that information during his hearing. So his denial is actually proof he did meet with someone.