Let the big boys talk UofM

(02-27-2017 03:07 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Let the big boys talk UofM

They've been talking. You just dont want to listen to them.

(02-27-2017 03:07 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Let the big boys talk UofM

And why are you speaking then? After having your argument thoroughly rebuffed, you continue to babble on to no end. He has as much right to comment as anyone.

John is the Chelsea Clinton twitter handle of this forum. He believes he is intellectually superior to everyone else, yet continually steps in it any time he opens his mouth.

(02-27-2017 03:04 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Not true. Inner cities such as Detroit voted at greater than 100%. Hence, the problem.

I believe the left wouldn't call that a problem they'd call that doubleplusgood. I can see the headline now... "Detroit voters did MORE than their democratic duty and should be rewarded."

(02-27-2017 03:00 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 01:13 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 01:11 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 01:06 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 12:50 PM)john01992 Wrote:  you are denying something that basic logic agrees with something that is 99% likely to be true on a technicality. when one goes down that road it proves they have a weak argument and do not have a strong case if they are resorting to a technicality.

Than, FFS, state it as a likelihood and not as a fact. Because it's not a fact. When one tries to turn a likelihood into an assumed fact it shows they have a shaq argument.

Many, many things in this world don't break down to 50/50... Many are 90/10 or 10/90.

The key legal term is beyond a reasonable doubt. Claiming 82 voters will al vote the same way is unreasonable

SMH, Did.... You.... Not.... See....

Many, many things in this world don't break down to 50/50... Many are 90/10 or 10/90.

Only inner cities vote at 90%. Everywhere else is closer to 50% than 100%. Basic math regarding probability (classic coin flip question) disagrees with you.

Wow... except that 'cheating' (which is the issue at hand) doesn't necessarily break down on party lines. It's not as if 'cheating' is a random walk. It is a targeted and most often intentional act.

(02-27-2017 01:11 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 01:06 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 12:50 PM)john01992 Wrote:  you are denying something that basic logic agrees with something that is 99% likely to be true on a technicality. when one goes down that road it proves they have a weak argument and do not have a strong case if they are resorting to a technicality.

Than, FFS, state it as a likelihood and not as a fact. Because it's not a fact. When one tries to turn a likelihood into an assumed fact it shows they have a shaq argument.

Many, many things in this world don't break down to 50/50... Many are 90/10 or 10/90.

The key legal term is beyond a reasonable doubt. Claiming 82 voters will al vote the same way is unreasonable

From SFC's article posted above:

Quote:The circumstances were eerily similar to those that tipped a 1948 Senate race to Lyndon Johnson. Election officials found ballot box 13 several days after the election. It held 203 votes, all but one for LBJ. Amazingly enough, the voters had cast their ballots in alphabetical order.

Unreasonable? Maybe. Not impossible.

There was also an election somewhere, recently settled by a coin flip. One fraudulent vote and the election would have been decided, illegally.

And to the original questions:

A. It's the law of the land, as in the legal process, and how our President is elected. It was designed, and adopted, for very specific reasons . Go read up on it.

B. It's against the law. Illegal. No matter how widespread. Do we ignore other serious crimes of fraud just cause they may not happen as often as say, getting mowed down in chitcago?

(02-27-2017 01:30 PM)dfarr Wrote:  Someone take away john's computer as well as any shiny or sharp objects before he hurts himself. The fact that this needs to be explained shows that you are not capable of logical thought.

Total votes don't matter in a presidential election.

Total votes do matter in statewide elections.

Illegals voting is a crime, thus it should be treated as one.

Even more amazingly we've been through this same stupid- type argument probably a dozen times or more since the crying started late evening of Nov 8.

It's become comically sad.

(02-27-2017 02:42 PM)Zombiewoof Wrote:  And for all of the bluster Democrats make about their opposition to voter ID laws, I have yet to see why they are against it. Who would be wronged?

Illegal voters(?).

(02-27-2017 03:04 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 03:00 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 01:13 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 01:11 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 01:06 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  Than, FFS, state it as a likelihood and not as a fact. Because it's not a fact. When one tries to turn a likelihood into an assumed fact it shows they have a shaq argument.

Many, many things in this world don't break down to 50/50... Many are 90/10 or 10/90.

The key legal term is beyond a reasonable doubt. Claiming 82 voters will al vote the same way is unreasonable

SMH, Did.... You.... Not.... See....

Many, many things in this world don't break down to 50/50... Many are 90/10 or 10/90.

Only inner cities vote at 90%. Everywhere else is closer to 50% than 100%. Basic math regarding probability (classic coin flip question) disagrees with you.

Not true. Inner cities such as Detroit voted at greater than 100%. Hence, the problem.

Something like 23 precincts in Philly and Greater Philly area, not ONE Romney vote in '12.

Not even a mistake, a hanging chad or someone getting out of the lockstep.

Yea, that sounds legit.

(02-27-2017 03:22 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  John is the Chelsea Clinton twitter handle of this forum. He believes he is intellectually superior to everyone else, yet continually steps in it any time he opens his mouth.

I know for a fact I'm smarter than you. You decided to but in with nonsense proving yourself as usual incapable of having a real conversation

(02-27-2017 03:20 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 03:07 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Let the big boys talk UofM

And why are you speaking then? After having your argument thoroughly rebuffed, you continue to babble on to no end. He has as much right to comment as anyone.

I would argue no con has come close to rebuffing my argument. Anyone who complains about trivial amounts of voter fraud because a one vote difference is a fundamental problem while scoffing at the popular voter total is completely hypocritical

(02-27-2017 04:58 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 03:22 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  John is the Chelsea Clinton twitter handle of this forum. He believes he is intellectually superior to everyone else, yet continually steps in it any time he opens his mouth.

I know for a fact I'm smarter than you. You decided to but in with nonsense proving yourself as usual incapable of having a real conversation

that would be "butt" in, genius.

(02-27-2017 05:03 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 04:58 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 03:22 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  John is the Chelsea Clinton twitter handle of this forum. He believes he is intellectually superior to everyone else, yet continually steps in it any time he opens his mouth.

I know for a fact I'm smarter than you. You decided to but in with nonsense proving yourself as usual incapable of having a real conversation

that would be "butt" in, genius.

You prove my point...again

(02-27-2017 05:04 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 05:03 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 04:58 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 03:22 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  John is the Chelsea Clinton twitter handle of this forum. He believes he is intellectually superior to everyone else, yet continually steps in it any time he opens his mouth.

I know for a fact I'm smarter than you. You decided to but in with nonsense proving yourself as usual incapable of having a real conversation

that would be "butt" in, genius.

You prove my point...again

your point is that you dont understand the correct grammatical use of the English language?

(02-27-2017 05:06 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 05:04 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 05:03 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 04:58 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 03:22 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  John is the Chelsea Clinton twitter handle of this forum. He believes he is intellectually superior to everyone else, yet continually steps in it any time he opens his mouth.

I know for a fact I'm smarter than you. You decided to but in with nonsense proving yourself as usual incapable of having a real conversation

that would be "butt" in, genius.

You prove my point...again

your point is that you dont understand the correct grammatical use of the English language?

You did it again

(02-27-2017 05:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 05:06 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 05:04 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 05:03 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 04:58 PM)john01992 Wrote:  I know for a fact I'm smarter than you. You decided to but in with nonsense proving yourself as usual incapable of having a real conversation

that would be "butt" in, genius.

You prove my point...again

your point is that you dont understand the correct grammatical use of the English language?

You did it again

and again and again, genius........

(02-27-2017 05:57 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 05:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 05:06 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 05:04 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 05:03 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  that would be "butt" in, genius.

You prove my point...again

your point is that you dont understand the correct grammatical use of the English language?

You did it again

and again and again, genius........

Every time you make an ass of yourself that gives me joy

(02-27-2017 11:14 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

Quote:The popular vote doesn't matter. HRC won by nearly 3 million...so what?

Quote:82 legitimate voters had their votes cancelled out by 82 illegal voters. That is outrageous and we need to take this very seriously.

I don't get why MOV doesn't matter in situation A...but in situation B it matters a great deal.

You understand it clearly John.

(02-27-2017 06:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 05:57 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 05:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 05:06 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-27-2017 05:04 PM)john01992 Wrote:  You prove my point...again

your point is that you dont understand the correct grammatical use of the English language?

You did it again

and again and again, genius........

Every time you make an ass of yourself that gives me joy

I was under the impression your tears were caused by butthurt and not joy.