I believe I witnessed the most ironic thing that I will ever witness on csnbbs today.

Today I saw conservatives pull the "but...but the democrats voted against the civil rights/voting rights acts of the 1960s" crap implying the Republicans hold the legacy of the civil rights act not the democrats. Said conservative poster did this in a thread about Republicans trying to censor a Democrat trying to read a letter written by Coretta Scott King. I am in complete shock and awe that this actually happened and it is truly telling as to how conservatives think.

Kinda like green eggs and ham. Who needs to here a 50 year old letter that has been read a thousand times.

(02-08-2017 05:55 PM)hoopfan Wrote:  Kinda like green eggs and ham. Who needs to here a 50 year old letter that has been read a thousand times.

when it is written about the very same racist individual politicians are actually considering confirming to a cabinet position.

the racist theme is not working. go back to the dem bag of tricks.

you mean the guy that shut down the KKK in Alabama? Why dont you want him confirmed again? Is it because you hate black people? Must be.

What are the odds that Johnny is a white male who has no and has never had a black friend?

Jeff Session... being racist as always.

(02-08-2017 06:01 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  What are the odds that Johnny is a white male who has no and has never had a black friend?

Black friend? I'd be shocked if he had any friends because around here if he acts in real life like he does on here he'd have swallowed some teeth a long, long time ago.

(02-08-2017 05:59 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  you mean the guy that shut down the KKK in Alabama? Why dont you want him confirmed again? Is it because you hate black people? Must be.

if coretta scott king wrote a letter condemning him then that makes it pretty obvious as to who he is. and isn't his pro civil rights record as a prosecutor almost entirely exaggerated or flat out false?

I'll be sure to send you your participation ribbon for making it through such a triggering thread......

You don't get it, do you? It's not racist to oppose something just because it was written by an African-American. It's not sexist to tell a United States Senator to follow the rules or be censored....

Liberals truly cannot understand the difference between us and them. And it is leading them to historic, possibly party-ending, defeat.

(02-08-2017 06:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-08-2017 05:59 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  you mean the guy that shut down the KKK in Alabama? Why dont you want him confirmed again? Is it because you hate black people? Must be.

if coretta scott king wrote a letter condemning him then that makes it pretty obvious as to who he is. and isn't his pro civil rights record as a prosecutor almost entirely exaggerated or flat out false?

Alveda King says you guys are using the King name to play the race card. Shame on you. Shame.

Now again explain why you hate black people.

(02-08-2017 05:59 PM)hoopfan Wrote:  the racist theme is not working. go back to the dem bag of tricks.

The idiots don't realize they're destroying their party. lol.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

(02-08-2017 06:43 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(02-08-2017 05:59 PM)hoopfan Wrote:  the racist theme is not working. go back to the dem bag of tricks.

The idiots don't realize they're destroying their party. lol.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

McConnell just made Elizabeth Warren the face of the Democratic party.



Chess not checkers

(02-08-2017 06:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-08-2017 05:59 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  you mean the guy that shut down the KKK in Alabama? Why dont you want him confirmed again? Is it because you hate black people? Must be.

if coretta scott king wrote a letter condemning him then that makes it pretty obvious as to who he is. and isn't his pro civil rights record as a prosecutor almost entirely exaggerated or flat out false?

Do you just never tire of being wrong, wrong and then wrong again?

It's astounding, really.

(02-08-2017 06:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  if coretta scott king wrote a letter condemning him then that makes it pretty obvious as to who he is.

Mkay.

(02-08-2017 06:14 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  I'll be sure to send you your participation ribbon for making it through such a triggering thread......

You don't get it, do you? It's not racist to oppose something just because it was written by an African-American. It's not sexist to tell a United States Senator to follow the rules or be censored....

Liberals truly cannot understand the difference between us and them. And it is leading them to historic, possibly party-ending, defeat.

did...did you just make an incredibly racist statement while trying to accuse me of racism? I never said King's words were important because she was black or even because she was the wife of King. I referenced her as a civil rights icon and nothing else. I can't believe you are saying that because she is black you can somehow limit her accomplishments/legacy and is only important because of her skin color. I hope this isn't what you intended to imply and since you are a good poster I will give you the benefit of a doubt and ask for you to clear up why you essentially said that because she is black she is a nobody being propped up solely because of her race. I really...really hope this isn't what you were trying to say.

also as for the pie hole comment: I did a forum search. I saw for instances. obama, a black male activist, Warren, and HRC. Pretty telling it's only used by the cons and against women and minorities.

(02-08-2017 08:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-08-2017 06:14 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  I'll be sure to send you your participation ribbon for making it through such a triggering thread......

You don't get it, do you? It's not racist to oppose something just because it was written by an African-American. It's not sexist to tell a United States Senator to follow the rules or be censored....

Liberals truly cannot understand the difference between us and them. And it is leading them to historic, possibly party-ending, defeat.

did...did you just make an incredibly racist statement while trying to accuse me of racism? I never said King's words were important because she was black or even because she was the wife of King. I referenced her as a civil rights icon and nothing else. I can't believe you are saying that because she is black you can somehow limit her accomplishments/legacy and is only important because of her skin color. I hope this isn't what you intended to imply and since you are a good poster I will give you the benefit of a doubt and ask for you to clear up why you essentially said that because she is black she is a nobody being propped up solely because of her race. I really...really hope this isn't what you were trying to say.

also as for the pie hole comment: I did a forum search. I saw for instances. obama, a black male activist, Warren, and HRC. Pretty telling it's only used by the cons and against women and minorities.

Did... Did you make something up that didn't happen. Why yes you did..

Jim Rome has been using pie hole with respect to everyone for decades.

(02-08-2017 05:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  I believe I witnessed the most ironic thing that I will ever witness on csnbbs today.

Today I saw conservatives pull the "but...but the democrats voted against the civil rights/voting rights acts of the 1960s" crap implying the Republicans hold the legacy of the civil rights act not the democrats. Said conservative poster did this in a thread about Republicans trying to censor a Democrat trying to read a letter written by Coretta Scott King. I am in complete shock and awe that this actually happened and it is truly telling as to how conservatives think.

Oh....You are going throw all conservatives in the same boat after reading a comment from a random internet poster? Good work.

(02-08-2017 08:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-08-2017 06:14 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  I'll be sure to send you your participation ribbon for making it through such a triggering thread......

You don't get it, do you? It's not racist to oppose something just because it was written by an African-American. It's not sexist to tell a United States Senator to follow the rules or be censored....

Liberals truly cannot understand the difference between us and them. And it is leading them to historic, possibly party-ending, defeat.

did...did you just make an incredibly racist statement while trying to accuse me of racism? I never said King's words were important because she was black or even because she was the wife of King. I referenced her as a civil rights icon and nothing else. I can't believe you are saying that because she is black you can somehow limit her accomplishments/legacy and is only important because of her skin color. I hope this isn't what you intended to imply and since you are a good poster I will give you the benefit of a doubt and ask for you to clear up why you essentially said that because she is black she is a nobody being propped up solely because of her race. I really...really hope this isn't what you were trying to say.

also as for the pie hole comment: I did a forum search. I saw for instances. obama, a black male activist, Warren, and HRC. Pretty telling it's only used by the cons and against women and minorities.

Wtf are you reading? He said no such thing. Intended no such thing. Implied no such thing. He essentially said no such thing. Again, what in the hell are you reading?

john being john. Making **** up and ascribing his made-up bs to someone.