Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
PAC expanding revenue deficit vs Big Ten and SEC
Author Message
p23570
Unregistered

 
CrappiesNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #11
RE: PAC expanding revenue deficit vs Big Ten and SEC
Lets be real. The PAC has been down for a while. So bad that Stanford has turned into the dominant program in many ways. Washington and Colorado were both blown off the field in bowl games and were completely outmatched from a talent standpoint. Stanford was able to play at an elite level with a once in a lifetime QB a few years back, and still lost to OkSU. Oregon has never really lived up to expectations even with elite talent which is not there anymore. USC is the conference's only shot at an elite team right now. Maybe Washington can get there but they have a long way to go if they plan to knock off Bama/Clemson. PAC FB attendance is only better than the ACC and that is only by a couple thousand fans per game.

Basketball is abysmal not close to p-5 levels.

Schools like CAL are struggling financially to keep up with facilities and coaches salaries, as is most of the PAC who require larger subsidies than the rest of the p-5 which is due to lacking fan support in donations and ticket sales as well as the PACN being a complete flop not even being carried by the major carriers. Schools like WSU, OSU, Utah, and Colorado are among the poorest AD's in the p-5.

You can be guaranteed that losing 10+M in TV $ along with lost income from donations, ticket sales, and the conference network will result in a competitive disadvantage. Most people don't realize that KU is richer than most of the PAC. All they want to talk about is population. Yea population who doesn't' care. That's worth what Direc TV is paying the PAC for PACN. That's right, nothing.
02-07-2017 11:48 PM
Quote this message in a reply
goofus Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,435
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 39
I Root For: Iowa
Location: chicago suburbs
Post: #12
RE: PAC expanding revenue deficit vs Big Ten and SEC
Don't worry the tv rights race is a bubble that can not be sustained. The main thing that jumped out to me in all your numbers is that rights fees are out of control. PAC revenue is growing, a lot, it just can't seem to catch up.

Remember back in 2009 when everybody was shocked to learn that the BigTen schools were making $17M a year. That seemed outrageous at the time. Now in less than 10 years its balooned to a more outrageous $43M? The bubble is going to pop.
02-08-2017 04:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,685
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 393
I Root For: Common Sense
Location: Nunnayadamnbusiness
Post: #13
RE: PAC expanding revenue deficit vs Big Ten and SEC
I'm not trying to debate political point, I am trying to make a point about the subject at hand. I don't think the bathroom bill stuff will be much of an issue because I expect those laws to be overturned, severely modified or struck down altogether as unconstitutional long before that becomes an issue.
02-08-2017 08:34 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CougarRed Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,392
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 269
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #14
RE: PAC expanding revenue deficit vs Big Ten and SEC
In 2014-15 (at that level of athletic giving, ticket buying, TV disparity, etc), here's what the average public school spent on athletics per conference, from:

http://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances/

Big 10 = $107M
SEC = $106M
Big 12 = $98M
ACC = $88M
Pac 12 = $83M
American = $51M
Mountain West = $39M
CUSA = $30M
MAC = $29M
Sun Belt = $23M

As the TV disparity grows, the Big 10 and SEC will pull further ahead from the rest. The Pac 12's only chance to stay in the game is to raid the Big 12 for Texas and Oklahoma. Just switching those two schools, and it's

Pac 12 = $94M
Big 12 = $82M
02-08-2017 08:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
FrancisDrake Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,572
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 61
I Root For: Piecesof8
Location:
Post: #15
RE: PAC expanding revenue deficit vs Big Ten and SEC
(02-07-2017 09:00 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(02-07-2017 05:59 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  Can we please avoid turning this into a political thread? Thanks

No problem. My question to you is:
When did the PAC ever make as much revenue as the Big 10 and SEC? I say never. They still get to play at the same level, just like the ACC. The only football conferences that went under were the Big East-Internal problems. WAC-internal problems. SWC maybe broke up due to tv revenues, but there were major sanctions (internal issues) with most of the conference at the time of its breakup. ...if the Big 12 breaks up--probably due to internal problems.

Cheers!

That same argument can be made about the P5 and G5 currently but it hasn't stopped the perception of division has it? Many BCS and now P5 schools always had more resources than other schools prior to the BCS era. If ESPN starts espousing the differences between the Power 2 and use-to-be-3 that will be the reality.
02-08-2017 09:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
nzmorange Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,000
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 279
I Root For: UAB
Location:
Post: #16
RE: PAC expanding revenue deficit vs Big Ten and SEC
(02-08-2017 08:51 AM)CougarRed Wrote:  In 2014-15 (at that level of athletic giving, ticket buying, TV disparity, etc), here's what the average public school spent on athletics per conference, from:

http://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances/

Big 10 = $107M
SEC = $106M
Big 12 = $98M
ACC = $88M
Pac 12 = $83M
American = $51M
Mountain West = $39M
CUSA = $30M
MAC = $29M
Sun Belt = $23M

As the TV disparity grows, the Big 10 and SEC will pull further ahead from the rest. The Pac 12's only chance to stay in the game is to raid the Big 12 for Texas and Oklahoma. Just switching those two schools, and it's

Pac 12 = $94M
Big 12 = $82M

IMHO, I think that the ACC would be crazy to not offer Texas a ND-type deal. I also think that offer would top anything that the PAC can offer.

I also think that OU would fit in better in the SEC, and I think that KU would prefer the B1G.

I don't think that the PAC has a play for a while. SDSU might eventually grow too big to ignore now that the chargers are gone. But the Cali schools will push against adding them until they are already a very established product, and that won't happen for another ~20 years (at the earliest). BYU would probably be the next best financial move, but they'd very much be a cultural outlier. But who knows? BYU might be fantastic for rivalries. Mormons invading Berkeley might be what the PAC needs to get left coasters to care about watching football.
02-08-2017 09:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jrj84105 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,097
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 36
I Root For: Utes
Location:
Post: #17
RE: PAC expanding revenue deficit vs Big Ten and SEC
The revenue gap basically means the smaller PAC schools won't offer as many Olympic sports as the smaller B1G/SEC schools, and the bigger PAC schools won't be having spring camp in Italy.
02-08-2017 09:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ValleyBoy Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 1,804
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation: 39
I Root For: GaSo,Troy
Location: Alabama
Post: #18
RE: PAC expanding revenue deficit vs Big Ten and SEC
Boo who. So some schools do not have the money to spend to make up grades at the same rate as schools in other conferences.
Now I am just going to take one SEC school Auburn and mention what they are spending the extra money on. A new video scoreboard that is so dam big that it could been seen clearly from 20 miles away. It would not surprise me if they added another one in the other endzone just so that the fans with seats with there back to the one they just build did not have to turn around to see it. Just this month Auburn announced that they were going to start a $28 million facility, locker room renovation at Jordan-Hare Stadium.
http://www.al.com/auburnfootball/index.s...r_roo.html

Now I toured the locker rooms just last spring at Jordan-Hare an there is nothing the least bit wrong with them. But that extra money has to be spent somewhere. Lets remodel the baseball locker rooms since they were only upgraded a few years ago.

New track & field facility, 2006.
New basketball arena & practice facility, 2010.
(This post was last modified: 02-08-2017 10:33 AM by ValleyBoy.)
02-08-2017 10:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
YNot Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,440
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 61
I Root For: BYU
Location:
Post: #19
RE: PAC expanding revenue deficit vs Big Ten and SEC
http://awfulannouncing.com/league-networ...-nets.html

PAC Networks are only in 15 million homes, millions fewer than B1G and SEC networks (and likely new ACC Network). The result is only $1.5M per school payout, despite full ownership of the network.

A big part of this is the lack of distribution by DirecTV. Lack of inventory outside of the Pacific and Mountain time zones also contributes.

In addition to low payouts, some AD's are upset with the frequent 10 or 10:30pm ET kickoff times with 1-2 weeks advance notice. Hurts ticket sales and lousy ratings in the East.

How soon do we reach the tipping point? Is there any hope for the PAC network without PAC expansion?

I honestly don't think the PAC is strong enough to attract Texas or Oklahoma in comparison to what the SEC, B1G, and even ACC might offer.

What other expansion options would the PAC seriously consider? TCU and Houston? If academics are a crucial factor - Kansas? Iowa St.? Rice? Tulane?

Could the PAC get Oklahoma, without Texas, if there are sufficient other Central time zone schools?

Oklahoma-TCU-Houston-Kansas?
02-08-2017 12:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
p23570
Unregistered

 
CrappiesNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #20
RE: PAC expanding revenue deficit vs Big Ten and SEC
The only thing that will fix the PAC network is adding rabid fan bases to the PACN. In the MTN and PAC time zones that meas BYU content. Outside of those time zones they need central time zone content.

I personally think the PAC and Big 12 are working together to solve the network issue as they both need each other at this point to survive. Big 12 adds BYU and 1 more (likely UConn) and partners with the PACN. At which point the carriage issue is solved instantly and the network can more forward. Boren gets his network, a CCG, and a conference with 12 members.
02-08-2017 12:44 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2017 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2017 MyBB Group.