Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Should NMSU join the Southland?
Author Message
billybobby777 Offline
Fighting the cartel 5
*

Posts: 5,760
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 226
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
Post: #11
RE: Should NMSU join the Southland?
(02-05-2017 06:51 PM)bullet Wrote:  And they have a good basketball program. They really need FBS to eventually get a decent home for their basketball. They aren't getting in the West Coast or return to the Missouri Valley. So they have to hope for the MWC.

That's it, they have to survive long enough to get into the MWC at some point very soon. I think they can make it as independent for 2 years, but I'm still watching to see if they can pull off the 5 mandatory home games for 2018:
-Wyoming.--scheduled
-FCS.--I'm assuming
-New Mexico--I'm assuming
Cheers!
02-05-2017 07:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MWC Tex Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,744
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 83
I Root For: MW
Location: Gravity Falls
Post: #12
RE: Should NMSU join the Southland?
(02-05-2017 02:52 PM)canewton Wrote:  NMSU will limp along with 5 home games for a while. Remember, they're not like Idaho. You can count guaranteed games with UTEP and New Mexico every year. There are other independents that would want home and home games late in the season (army, Umass, BYU). They'll play 3 buy-games against P5 teams, and go buy an FCS team. So all that together is 9 games. Just need to go get 3 more and you have a schedule.

I think NMSU is playing it smart. Wait until the early 2020s for expansion to blow up again. The MWC will get hit, and they'll slide right in.

There will be no more G5 expansion. The Sunbelt won't expand past 10.
02-05-2017 07:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NuMexAg Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 387
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 15
I Root For: NMSU
Location: DFW
Post: #13
RE: Should NMSU join the Southland?
I think NMSU is more likely to drop football than join the Southland. Not only is the conference a bad match academically and perception wise, but NMSU recruits heavily in Texas now, and basically only has the FBS label as advantage over schools like Sam Houston and SFAustin. As an FCS member that advantage would disappear. We get a few hidden gem players each year now ,but as an FCS team in a Texas centric league even that would end.

The Big Sky is a tough match geographically because of the distances and smaller cities, but I think because the Western location would put NMSU on more or less the same recruiting situation within the conference, and it is a better match academically and school mission wise, it is a more likely destination than the Southland.

Not to say NMSU wouldn't drop football instead of any FCS, but if we go FCS, I think it is Big Sky.
02-05-2017 11:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
LatahCounty Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,489
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation: 75
I Root For: Idaho
Location:
Post: #14
RE: Should NMSU join the Southland?
(02-05-2017 11:41 PM)NuMexAg Wrote:  I think NMSU is more likely to drop football than join the Southland. Not only is the conference a bad match academically and perception wise, but NMSU recruits heavily in Texas now, and basically only has the FBS label as advantage over schools like Sam Houston and SFAustin. As an FCS member that advantage would disappear. We get a few hidden gem players each year now ,but as an FCS team in a Texas centric league even that would end.

The Big Sky is a tough match geographically because of the distances and smaller cities, but I think because the Western location would put NMSU on more or less the same recruiting situation within the conference, and it is a better match academically and school mission wise, it is a more likely destination than the Southland.

Not to say NMSU wouldn't drop football instead of any FCS, but if we go FCS, I think it is Big Sky.

Don't join the Big Sky. I don't even want Idaho to join the Big Sky, and at least in our case it makes geographic sense. People complain about the cost of FBS football, but the finances of scholarship FCS are terrible.

Idaho is going to take about a 50% hit to the non-subsidized part of our athletic budget as donor money dries up and revenue from guarantee games and CFP gets slashed. The taxpayers will end up paying for about 75% of our athletic department (it's about 48% now). This is a very typical subsidy-to-revenue ratio for FCS schools that aren't located in Montana.

I haven't looked into NMSU and you guys have better basketball than we do, so maybe the numbers aren't quite as bad in your case but I'm sure a drop would still be a financial hit plus you guys would have far worse travel in any FCS conference than we do in the Big Sky. Idaho and New Mexico are not rich states. In our case I have to believe our Republican-dominated state government will eventually ask why it's pumping so much money into something that isn't delivering much of a return. I don't know what will happen at that point but it won't be good.

And all of this isn't even taking into account the biggest reason not to join the Big Sky -- It's FCS. Who the hell cares?

You guys are doing the right thing in an awful situation. Joining the Big Sky or any other FCS conference is a great way to lose a lot of money and also take a big in-state PR hit. Good luck out there.
(This post was last modified: 02-06-2017 01:53 AM by LatahCounty.)
02-06-2017 01:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
esayem Offline
Hark The Sound!
*

Posts: 3,812
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 111
I Root For: The Heels
Location: Tobacco Road
Post: #15
RE: Should NMSU join the Southland?
NMSU will not drop football. They are in the same boat as UMass as far as prioritizing basketball in a football world.. On a side note, I believe if UMass took the MAC offer they'd be at the top of the conference; they have a ton of young talent in a top 7 league.
02-06-2017 03:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
00yyz Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 72
Joined: Jul 2016
Reputation: 7
I Root For: UofA
Location:
Post: #16
RE: Should NMSU join the Southland?
NMSU offers the MWC a semi warm body at best and the MWC already has 12 football playing members so unless thw MWC loses 4 members or more NMSU would only take from them while offering them nothing...
Chances of NMSU joining a FBS conference in 5 tp 10 years are just about none...
Time for them to stand up and face the facts and realize the NM gov is going to keep cutting their budget and now is a good time to drop football amd concentrate on sports that are sustaniable and of some value...
02-06-2017 12:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MplsBison Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,066
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 130
I Root For: NDSU/Minnesota
Location:
Post: #17
RE: Should NMSU join the Southland?
Best case scenario would be MWC taking both NM St and UTEP.

But I doubt the MWC has any interest in that.
02-06-2017 12:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MWC Tex Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,744
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 83
I Root For: MW
Location: Gravity Falls
Post: #18
RE: Should NMSU join the Southland?
(02-06-2017 12:12 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  Best case scenario would be MWC taking both NM St and UTEP.

But I doubt the MWC has any interest in that.

There will be no more expansion of any G5 schools. Not even the Sunbelt with 10 teams.

If there is a change in the distribution of the G5 CFP $$ it could be a possibility, but since the G5 conferences decided to lower the base amount from 12 to 10 million states, they are going to do any changes to incentivize larger conferences.
(This post was last modified: 02-06-2017 12:24 PM by MWC Tex.)
02-06-2017 12:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MplsBison Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,066
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 130
I Root For: NDSU/Minnesota
Location:
Post: #19
RE: Should NMSU join the Southland?
On that simple basis, I agree.

A G5 still might find another basis on which expansion makes more overall sense than staying. But generally I think the FBS confs are pretty much locked in ... so long as nothing major happens to the Big 12.

Then again, people have probably been saying that for a while.
02-06-2017 12:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Chappy Offline
Resident Goonie
*

Posts: 13,773
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 420
I Root For: East Carolina
Location: Raleigh, NC
Post: #20
RE: Should NMSU join the Southland?
It's a shame the Sun Belt doesn't want them. They are not THAT far out of the western footprint, and their Basketball and Baseball would be assets to that league.
02-06-2017 12:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2017 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2017 MyBB Group.