(03-20-2017 07:35 AM)emu79 Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 10:33 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 09:59 PM)Big_Man Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 09:05 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 07:39 PM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  MD being a trump guy really makes it all make sense. I get it now lol.

Im not a Trump guy, Im a conservative and he just happened to be the best option this year.

For not being a Trump guy, you seem to be on board with all of his policies.

I am on board with most of his policies. Shouldn't be anything controversial about protecting our borders, stimulating companies to stay in this country, and respecting and building up the military

You mean lying to the American people everyday is acceptable? Right lets pillage medical care for the working poor and elderly to give a huge tax break to the upper 2% via our GOP medical bill which isn't coverage for everyone as Trump promised under the premise of deficit reduction which in GOP speak means taking benefits away from everyday Americans to fund tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations, wait until they get to Social Security and Medicare and Trump allows them to break yet another campaign promise, lets build a Trump pyramid called the Wall while we cut school lunches, meals on wheels when hiring a couple of thousand more border guards will do, lets ignore facts and have our cabinet tell their own lies to the American people about contacts with Russia, where's all the billions of fraud and abuse he was going to find? I'll tell you where to start-military spending-don't spend more on the military under you recover billions in fraud that is already spent. The man is 110% totally self absorbed serial liar who blames everyone else for his failures. We want 10 years of tax returns and a full financial disclosure of all of his business holdings. And his cabinet is UN-ethical, UN-qualified and Un-American.

Tell us how you really feel!

But I agree. And it's no surprise after he got elected that we would act like a 6-year-old, self-absorbed brat, since he did that all through the campaign. Which he still thinks he's in the middle of.

Coming off the most dishonest presidency this country has even seen the past 8 years, its seems hypocritical to call Trump a liar.

(03-20-2017 11:03 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  Coming off the most dishonest presidency this country has even seen the past 8 years, its seems hypocritical to call Trump a liar.

Obama was a wonderful president. I wish he could've stayed 4 more years instead of having the narcissistic, pathological liar of a sideshow we have now.

(03-20-2017 05:02 PM)niubrad00 Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 11:03 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  Coming off the most dishonest presidency this country has even seen the past 8 years, its seems hypocritical to call Trump a liar.

Obama was a wonderful president. I wish he could've stayed 4 more years instead of having the narcissistic, pathological liar of a sideshow we have now.

First 4 words that come to mind when someone says Obama: corrupt, divisive, bigot, and liar.

(03-20-2017 05:54 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 05:02 PM)niubrad00 Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 11:03 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  Coming off the most dishonest presidency this country has even seen the past 8 years, its seems hypocritical to call Trump a liar.

Obama was a wonderful president. I wish he could've stayed 4 more years instead of having the narcissistic, pathological liar of a sideshow we have now.

First 4 words that come to mind when someone says Obama: corrupt, divisive, bigot, and liar.

What are the first 4 words that come to your mind when someone says trump?

(03-20-2017 06:18 PM)1eyed_jack Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 05:54 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 05:02 PM)niubrad00 Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 11:03 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  Coming off the most dishonest presidency this country has even seen the past 8 years, its seems hypocritical to call Trump a liar.

Obama was a wonderful president. I wish he could've stayed 4 more years instead of having the narcissistic, pathological liar of a sideshow we have now.

First 4 words that come to mind when someone says Obama: corrupt, divisive, bigot, and liar.

What are the first 4 words that come to your mind when someone says trump?

spontaneous, un-polished, patriotism, reform

(03-20-2017 06:19 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 06:18 PM)1eyed_jack Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 05:54 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 05:02 PM)niubrad00 Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 11:03 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  Coming off the most dishonest presidency this country has even seen the past 8 years, its seems hypocritical to call Trump a liar.

Obama was a wonderful president. I wish he could've stayed 4 more years instead of having the narcissistic, pathological liar of a sideshow we have now.

First 4 words that come to mind when someone says Obama: corrupt, divisive, bigot, and liar.

What are the first 4 words that come to your mind when someone says trump?

spontaneous, un-polished, patriotism, reform

Thank you. This has become my favorite post on this board!

(03-20-2017 06:27 PM)1eyed_jack Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 06:19 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 06:18 PM)1eyed_jack Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 05:54 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 05:02 PM)niubrad00 Wrote:  Obama was a wonderful president. I wish he could've stayed 4 more years instead of having the narcissistic, pathological liar of a sideshow we have now.

First 4 words that come to mind when someone says Obama: corrupt, divisive, bigot, and liar.

What are the first 4 words that come to your mind when someone says trump?

spontaneous, un-polished, patriotism, reform

Thank you. This has become my favorite post on this board!

Thanks!

WSJ Editorial: Most Americans may conclude Trump fake president.

(03-22-2017 11:22 PM)NIU17 Wrote:  WSJ Editorial: Most Americans may conclude Trump fake president.

It was SOOO classic this article came out the day that it was stated the Trump campaign was under surveillance. I feel so bad for the media, they just don't know how to slay this dragon, I love it!

(03-23-2017 12:30 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-22-2017 11:22 PM)NIU17 Wrote:  WSJ Editorial: Most Americans may conclude Trump fake president.

It was SOOO classic this article came out the day that it was stated the Trump campaign was under surveillance. I feel so bad for the media, they just don't know how to slay this dragon, I love it!

I figured you would take it more seriously since it was from the WSJ. The Trump campaign wasn't under surveillance, Russia was and the Trump people working on his campaign had communications with the Russians under surveillance. Do you see the difference?

(03-23-2017 09:48 AM)NIU17 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 12:30 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-22-2017 11:22 PM)NIU17 Wrote:  WSJ Editorial: Most Americans may conclude Trump fake president.

It was SOOO classic this article came out the day that it was stated the Trump campaign was under surveillance. I feel so bad for the media, they just don't know how to slay this dragon, I love it!

I figured you would take it more seriously since it was from the WSJ. The Trump campaign wasn't under surveillance, Russia was and the Trump people working on his campaign had communications with the Russians under surveillance. Do you see the difference?

I think what we are going to find out is that Russia was used as a broad catch term to do political surveillance. That explains why multiple felonies were committed by Obama administration in unmasking the names of American citizens that in no way should be unmasked.

(03-23-2017 09:52 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 09:48 AM)NIU17 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 12:30 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-22-2017 11:22 PM)NIU17 Wrote:  WSJ Editorial: Most Americans may conclude Trump fake president.

It was SOOO classic this article came out the day that it was stated the Trump campaign was under surveillance. I feel so bad for the media, they just don't know how to slay this dragon, I love it!

I figured you would take it more seriously since it was from the WSJ. The Trump campaign wasn't under surveillance, Russia was and the Trump people working on his campaign had communications with the Russians under surveillance. Do you see the difference?

I think what we are going to find out is that Russia was used as a broad catch term to do political surveillance. That explains why multiple felonies were committed by Obama administration in unmasking the names of American citizens that in no way should be unmasked.

Ridiculous comments.

(03-23-2017 12:06 PM)NIU17 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 09:52 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 09:48 AM)NIU17 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 12:30 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-22-2017 11:22 PM)NIU17 Wrote:  WSJ Editorial: Most Americans may conclude Trump fake president.

It was SOOO classic this article came out the day that it was stated the Trump campaign was under surveillance. I feel so bad for the media, they just don't know how to slay this dragon, I love it!

I figured you would take it more seriously since it was from the WSJ. The Trump campaign wasn't under surveillance, Russia was and the Trump people working on his campaign had communications with the Russians under surveillance. Do you see the difference?

I think what we are going to find out is that Russia was used as a broad catch term to do political surveillance. That explains why multiple felonies were committed by Obama administration in unmasking the names of American citizens that in no way should be unmasked.

Ridiculous comments.

You know what is ridiculous? How Democrats were not incensed at their presidential candidate having financial ties to so many countries (many of which brutalize women and gays). Yet they are up in arms about a POSSIBLE Russian connection in which no collusion evidence has been found over an 8 month investigation. Where was that moral outrage when Clinton had those ties with those countries, in some cases barbaric evil countries? So funny, so hypocritical, so pathetic, so ridiculous.

(03-24-2017 11:52 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 12:06 PM)NIU17 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 09:52 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 09:48 AM)NIU17 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 12:30 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  It was SOOO classic this article came out the day that it was stated the Trump campaign was under surveillance. I feel so bad for the media, they just don't know how to slay this dragon, I love it!

I figured you would take it more seriously since it was from the WSJ. The Trump campaign wasn't under surveillance, Russia was and the Trump people working on his campaign had communications with the Russians under surveillance. Do you see the difference?

I think what we are going to find out is that Russia was used as a broad catch term to do political surveillance. That explains why multiple felonies were committed by Obama administration in unmasking the names of American citizens that in no way should be unmasked.

Ridiculous comments.

You know what is ridiculous? How Democrats were not incensed at their presidential candidate having financial ties to so many countries (many of which brutalize women and gays). Yet they are up in arms about a POSSIBLE Russian connection in which no collusion evidence has been found over an 8 month investigation. Where was that moral outrage when Clinton had those ties with those countries, in some cases barbaric evil countries? So funny, so hypocritical, so pathetic, so ridiculous.

What countries did Obama have personal financial ties with?

I will say it is nice that Trump appears to have shown some humility by taking a step off on his twitter usage. Glad to see both sides pleading with him to ease up seems to have worked!

(03-24-2017 01:36 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(03-24-2017 11:52 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 12:06 PM)NIU17 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 09:52 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 09:48 AM)NIU17 Wrote:  I figured you would take it more seriously since it was from the WSJ. The Trump campaign wasn't under surveillance, Russia was and the Trump people working on his campaign had communications with the Russians under surveillance. Do you see the difference?

I think what we are going to find out is that Russia was used as a broad catch term to do political surveillance. That explains why multiple felonies were committed by Obama administration in unmasking the names of American citizens that in no way should be unmasked.

Ridiculous comments.

You know what is ridiculous? How Democrats were not incensed at their presidential candidate having financial ties to so many countries (many of which brutalize women and gays). Yet they are up in arms about a POSSIBLE Russian connection in which no collusion evidence has been found over an 8 month investigation. Where was that moral outrage when Clinton had those ties with those countries, in some cases barbaric evil countries? So funny, so hypocritical, so pathetic, so ridiculous.

What countries did Obama have personal financial ties with?

I was mainly talking about Hillary with her taking money even from terrorist states. But Obama was the biggest donor to Iran's nuclear program, and all he got out of it was some assurance that Israel would eventually be nuked.

(03-27-2017 11:07 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-24-2017 01:36 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(03-24-2017 11:52 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 12:06 PM)NIU17 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 09:52 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  I think what we are going to find out is that Russia was used as a broad catch term to do political surveillance. That explains why multiple felonies were committed by Obama administration in unmasking the names of American citizens that in no way should be unmasked.

Ridiculous comments.

You know what is ridiculous? How Democrats were not incensed at their presidential candidate having financial ties to so many countries (many of which brutalize women and gays). Yet they are up in arms about a POSSIBLE Russian connection in which no collusion evidence has been found over an 8 month investigation. Where was that moral outrage when Clinton had those ties with those countries, in some cases barbaric evil countries? So funny, so hypocritical, so pathetic, so ridiculous.

What countries did Obama have personal financial ties with?

I was mainly talking about Hillary with her taking money even from terrorist states. But Obama was the biggest donor to Iran's nuclear program, and all he got out of it was some assurance that Israel would eventually be nuked.

Pretty sure Obama didn't send his own money to Iran. And he didn't donate money in any case, he just unfroze Iranian assets.

(03-27-2017 04:37 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 11:07 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-24-2017 01:36 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(03-24-2017 11:52 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-23-2017 12:06 PM)NIU17 Wrote:  Ridiculous comments.

You know what is ridiculous? How Democrats were not incensed at their presidential candidate having financial ties to so many countries (many of which brutalize women and gays). Yet they are up in arms about a POSSIBLE Russian connection in which no collusion evidence has been found over an 8 month investigation. Where was that moral outrage when Clinton had those ties with those countries, in some cases barbaric evil countries? So funny, so hypocritical, so pathetic, so ridiculous.

What countries did Obama have personal financial ties with?

I was mainly talking about Hillary with her taking money even from terrorist states. But Obama was the biggest donor to Iran's nuclear program, and all he got out of it was some assurance that Israel would eventually be nuked.

Pretty sure Obama didn't send his own money to Iran. And he didn't donate money in any case, he just unfroze Iranian assets.

Please stop making sense, you know MD has proof that President Obama is not a Kenyan Muslim Socialist who was not born in America! Tiny Hands said it and Ilm sure alex jones did too which is all the proof MD needs

(03-29-2017 12:54 AM)Policiious Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 04:37 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(03-27-2017 11:07 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  

(03-24-2017 01:36 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(03-24-2017 11:52 AM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote:  You know what is ridiculous? How Democrats were not incensed at their presidential candidate having financial ties to so many countries (many of which brutalize women and gays). Yet they are up in arms about a POSSIBLE Russian connection in which no collusion evidence has been found over an 8 month investigation. Where was that moral outrage when Clinton had those ties with those countries, in some cases barbaric evil countries? So funny, so hypocritical, so pathetic, so ridiculous.

What countries did Obama have personal financial ties with?

I was mainly talking about Hillary with her taking money even from terrorist states. But Obama was the biggest donor to Iran's nuclear program, and all he got out of it was some assurance that Israel would eventually be nuked.

Pretty sure Obama didn't send his own money to Iran. And he didn't donate money in any case, he just unfroze Iranian assets.

Please stop making sense, you know MD has proof that President Obama is not a Kenyan Muslim Socialist who was not born in America! Tiny Hands said it and Ilm sure alex jones did too which is all the proof MD needs

Calling the President Tiny Hands all the time makes your IQ look pretty tiny.