With Woodard back healthy, OU beat TTU and now beats West Virginia on the road. That Memphis win at OU will end up being an impressive one by end of season.

South Carolina beat Florida also.

Also, top 25 S Carolina won tonight.
If you have to ask why this is Tiger related , then you need to follow Tigers more closely

Wish we hadn't dropped a turd at Tulsa. Our resume can probably be pretty decent by end of season.

Was a good win by them...But at this point we have to come close to running the table to get an at large...

Now if we can avoid taking the gas pipe tomorrow night

(01-18-2017 09:32 PM)tigersroll Wrote:  South Carolina beat Florida also.

OU was a good win for them; SC with Thornwell was good win for them. Neither will affect us whatsoever unless we were to win out and maybe not even then.

The committee will look at who was playing and who was not playing at the time. The 7 game losing streak for OU would be a factor.

(01-18-2017 10:22 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  The committee will look at who was playing and who was not playing at the time. The 7 game losing streak for OU would be a factor.

Woodard was playing when we beat them. It goes to show that our win on the road was very impressive.

(01-18-2017 10:06 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 09:32 PM)tigersroll Wrote:  South Carolina beat Florida also.

OU was a good win for them; SC with Thornwell was good win for them. Neither will affect us whatsoever unless we were to win out and maybe not even then.

This is a ridiculous statement and lends more proof to you having an agenda. If we ran the table we would be 26-5 and probably win the conference championship. We would then at least win one in the conference tournament and have at least 27 wins. How in the world are you smarter than 99% of the board making a statement like this??

(01-18-2017 10:23 PM)tiger1016 Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:22 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  The committee will look at who was playing and who was not playing at the time. The 7 game losing streak for OU would be a factor.

Woodard was playing when we beat them. It goes to show that our win on the road was very impressive.

It also goes to show you that his knowledge is lacking and the ever popular agenda is in play.

(01-18-2017 10:23 PM)tiger1016 Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:22 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  The committee will look at who was playing and who was not playing at the time. The 7 game losing streak for OU would be a factor.

Woodard was playing when we beat them. It goes to show that our win on the road was very impressive.

But Lattin only played 9 minutes and had only 4 points and 1 rebound.

(01-18-2017 11:00 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:23 PM)tiger1016 Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:22 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  The committee will look at who was playing and who was not playing at the time. The 7 game losing streak for OU would be a factor.

Woodard was playing when we beat them. It goes to show that our win on the road was very impressive.

But Lattin only played 9 minutes and had only 4 points and 1 rebound.

Glad to see you are giving your Josh love doll a rest.

(01-18-2017 10:28 PM)TubbyTime Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:23 PM)tiger1016 Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:22 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  The committee will look at who was playing and who was not playing at the time. The 7 game losing streak for OU would be a factor.

Woodard was playing when we beat them. It goes to show that our win on the road was very impressive.

It also goes to show you that his knowledge is lacking and the ever popular agenda is in play.

Was not logged in and unfortunately saw your post. SC is 12-0 with Thornwell playing and 3-3 without him. Do YOU think the committee will take that into account in our win without Thornwell?

(01-18-2017 11:00 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:23 PM)tiger1016 Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:22 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  The committee will look at who was playing and who was not playing at the time. The 7 game losing streak for OU would be a factor.

Woodard was playing when we beat them. It goes to show that our win on the road was very impressive.

But Lattin only played 9 minutes and had only 4 points and 1 rebound.

Dude...come on now

You just can't give our team credit. Unbelievable

(01-18-2017 11:05 PM)Davidofmtp Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 11:00 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:23 PM)tiger1016 Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:22 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  The committee will look at who was playing and who was not playing at the time. The 7 game losing streak for OU would be a factor.

Woodard was playing when we beat them. It goes to show that our win on the road was very impressive.

But Lattin only played 9 minutes and had only 4 points and 1 rebound.

Glad to see you are giving your Josh love doll a rest.

That's not what the doll said!!

(01-18-2017 11:00 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:23 PM)tiger1016 Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:22 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  The committee will look at who was playing and who was not playing at the time. The 7 game losing streak for OU would be a factor.

Woodard was playing when we beat them. It goes to show that our win on the road was very impressive.

But Lattin only played 9 minutes and had only 4 points and 1 rebound.

At the very least, we should all get a laugh out of your posts at least once a day. that post is hilarious.

from the vt-gt game

4 teams from the old metro conference are in the acc

virginia tech, georgia tech, louisville, florida state

Only way in is to win the tournament, but this stuff will help a little with seeding should we do it.

(01-18-2017 11:10 PM)Penny Lane Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:28 PM)TubbyTime Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:23 PM)tiger1016 Wrote:  

(01-18-2017 10:22 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  The committee will look at who was playing and who was not playing at the time. The 7 game losing streak for OU would be a factor.

Woodard was playing when we beat them. It goes to show that our win on the road was very impressive.

It also goes to show you that his knowledge is lacking and the ever popular agenda is in play.

Was not logged in and unfortunately saw your post. SC is 12-0 with Thornwell playing and 3-3 without him. Do YOU think the committee will take that into account in our win without Thornwell?

please don't ever ask me any questions, for I do not respect you or have any desire to answer questions that come from you. As to your unfortunate comment, dude every time I see a post from you is mightily unfortunate for me and many others here. Good day. I'll be pulling for the Tigers and Tubby tonight!