(01-14-2017 03:33 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(01-14-2017 03:28 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-14-2017 03:24 PM)Zombiewoof Wrote:  

(01-14-2017 03:14 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-14-2017 03:05 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

They don’t just want to express themselves, they want to cut off the ability of others to express themselves and celebrate. Tolerance on parade.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/...-home.html

So, you guys are supportive of free speech?

I 100% support your right to free speech. I also hope you support my right to knock the **** out of you if your free speech is in my face. There is free speech and there is disturbing the peace, assault, distruption of commerce -- all leftist tactics. You are free to say whatever you will on your property, in your publication or at your venue. It is not free speech to shout down speakers, disrupt events and hearings or to trespass on others' property and create anarchy.

Sorry, you have no problem whatsoever of Jeff Sessions using the state to prohibit free speech.

You support their disenfranchisement as voters, because they live in California.

---

This is precisely the problem with a group, supported by only 45% of the population running ramshod over everyone else.

Feel free to make Pharma douche your leader.

---

I don't support violence, but I have no problem with persons, willing to go to jail to use non-violent resistance.

306 electoral votes to 232 electoral votes. Just burns you up that your b#tch got her azz whipped and you continue to whine like a spoiled brat. As I have said, you are great entertainment. Don't stop the whining. It is all what leftists like you have left.

Final total was 304-227. Their efforts to cheat and lie in the media backfired, driving people to Trump. Their efforts to disrupt the electoral college backfired, hurting HRC more.

In other words, the left only supports free speech for themselves and supports mobs and other gestapo style tactics to deny others.

(01-14-2017 04:46 PM)bullet Wrote:  In other words, the left only supports free speech for themselves and supports mobs and other gestapo style tactics to deny others.

In other words, they are really the fascists that they accuse others of being.

I don't support violence, but I have no problem with persons, willing to go to jail to use non-violent resistance.
[/quote]


Now, that would be a first from these Libturd groups. Every protest has become a free for all in violence.

(01-14-2017 04:58 PM)Zombiewoof Wrote:  

(01-14-2017 04:46 PM)bullet Wrote:  In other words, the left only supports free speech for themselves and supports mobs and other gestapo style tactics to deny others.

In other words, they are really the fascists that they accuse others of being.

Yep. Freedom for me, but not for thee. I just hope they keep it up, will make it easier to drub them when 2018 rolls around.

I fully support any and all non violent civil disobedience and protest as long as it does not impede the access to public transportation and egress to public property. When that occurs? I support the police dragging you off with force if necessary.

I expect plenty of liberals showing up at the inauguration to protest losing the election. I also expect that the necessary security will be in place to insure the safety of Trump and Pence and that they are not delayed getting to the event. I expect that these protesters will not be allowed anywhere close to the ceremony and be able to disrupt it. The event will go on without a hitch.

(01-14-2017 03:28 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Sorry, you have no problem whatsoever of Jeff Sessions using the state to prohibit free speech.

Brought to you buy someone who all but ignored Obama's IRS going after conservative groups..

Quote:You support their disenfranchisement as voters, because they live in California.

The electoral college is not disenfranchisement.

Quote:This is precisely the problem with a group, supported by only 45% of the population running ramshod over everyone else.

Bill Clinton only got 43% of the vote...

Quote:Feel free to make Pharma douche your leader.

Are you talking about Corey Booker?

Quote:I don't support violence, but I have no problem with persons, willing to go to jail to use non-violent resistance.

Physically preventing people from associating *is* violence. It matters not if a punch is thrown or not.

(01-14-2017 03:05 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  They don’t just want to express themselves, they want to cut off the ability of others to express themselves and celebrate. Tolerance on parade.

That is straight from the progresso-fascist playbook. Expression and tolerance for me, not thee.

(01-14-2017 03:14 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-14-2017 03:05 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

They don’t just want to express themselves, they want to cut off the ability of others to express themselves and celebrate. Tolerance on parade.

Quote:An anti-Donald Trump group is planning massive disruptions for next week’s inauguration covering everything from “blockades” at security checkpoints to a “dance party” outside VP-elect Mike Pence’s house, according to group leaders as well as newly obtained audio of their apparent plans.

The organization #DisruptJ20 already announced at a press conference Thursday its various plans to wreak havoc at Trump’s Jan. 20 inauguration and in the days leading up to it.

A conservative group also shared with FoxNews.com what it said was audio from a Jan. 8 #DisruptJ20 meeting at a Washington church, giving even greater insight into the group’s planned D.C. “shutdown.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/...-home.html

So, you guys are supportive of free speech?

Free speech is wonderful. But it does not include blocking highways, preventing conservatives from speaking on college campuses, or burning someone else's car.

Can we all agree on this?

Three solutions to this problem:

Since the anti Trump protesters and supporters were such water carriers for Obama and Hillary, Why not send Them out with Firehoses, gliding and floating them across frozen iced parking lots. Send Them out is style ! Lol

(01-15-2017 01:22 PM)CardFan1 Wrote:  Since the anti Trump protesters and supporters were such water carriers for Obama and Hillary, Why not send Them out with Firehoses, gliding and floating them across frozen iced parking lots. Send Them out is style ! Lol

That worked great in Birmingham when Bull Connor did it.

(01-14-2017 03:14 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-14-2017 03:05 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

They don’t just want to express themselves, they want to cut off the ability of others to express themselves and celebrate. Tolerance on parade.

Quote:An anti-Donald Trump group is planning massive disruptions for next week’s inauguration covering everything from “blockades” at security checkpoints to a “dance party” outside VP-elect Mike Pence’s house, according to group leaders as well as newly obtained audio of their apparent plans.

The organization #DisruptJ20 already announced at a press conference Thursday its various plans to wreak havoc at Trump’s Jan. 20 inauguration and in the days leading up to it.

A conservative group also shared with FoxNews.com what it said was audio from a Jan. 8 #DisruptJ20 meeting at a Washington church, giving even greater insight into the group’s planned D.C. “shutdown.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/...-home.html

So, you guys are supportive of free speech?

Performers who had signed ups to sing at Trump's Inauguration are dropping out due to death threats they have received. I guess you don't support their freedom of speech?