Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Playoff $
Author Message
billybobby777 Offline
The REAL BillyBobby
*

Posts: 11,898
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 502
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
Post: #61
RE: Playoff $
(01-09-2017 06:20 PM)Tigersmoke3 Wrote:  
(01-09-2017 06:03 PM)8BitPirate Wrote:  
(01-09-2017 01:43 PM)Tigersmoke3 Wrote:  
(01-09-2017 01:03 PM)Chappy Wrote:  Basically, here is the breakdown from last year:

Quote:The following estimates of the CFP revenue distribution are based on preliminary calculations for the 2015-2016 season and are only approximate projections of potential revenue distribution from each component:

(1) Each conference will receive $300,000 for each of its schools when the school’s football team meets the NCAA’s APR for participation in a post-season football game. Each independent institution will also receive the $300,000 when its football team meets that standard.

(2) Each of the 10 conferences will also receive a base amount. For conferences that have contracts for their champions to participate in the Orange, Rose or Sugar Bowl, the base combined with the full academic performance pool will be approximately $51 million for each conference. The five conferences that do not have contracts for their champions to participate in the Orange, Rose or Sugar Bowls will receive approximately $79 million in aggregate (full academic pool plus base), which the conferences will distribute as they choose. Notre Dame will receive a payment of $2.58 million if it meets the APR standard; the other two independents will share $618,241.

(3) A conference will receive $6 million for each team that is selected for the semifinal games. There will be no additional distribution to conferences whose teams qualify for the national championship game. A conference will receive $4 million for each team that plays in a non-playoff bowl under the arrangement (in 2014-2015, the Cotton, Fiesta and Peach Bowls).

(4) Each conference whose team participates in a playoff semifinal, Cotton, Fiesta or Peach Bowl, or in the national championship game will receive $2.08 million to cover expenses for each game. Additionally, certain conferences in the Football Championship Subdivision conferences will receive
$2.34 million in aggregate.

The above article is only dealing with the part I bolded, which is where "group of five" comes from. If we ever truly want there to be a group of four, we need to get a contract with one of those bowls, but let's not go down that path in this thread please.

edit - now that I read it again, I think that item 2 includes item 1, based on the "base combined with the full academic performance pool" language.
This is what I've been curious about, if the AAC were to buy the cotton bowl would that not make us p6 instantly? Isn't that basically what the ACC did to garuantee their inclusion in the power structure when they bought the Orange bowl

The AAC should quietly gather the resources together and attempt this. Hell I'd kick in a few shekels to see that happen.
I think the AAC was offered the chance to start a contract bowl and or convince one to add us on their own (which did not happen). We could shock the sports world if we can find a good loan officer 05-mafia

"I think the AAC was offered the chance to start a contract Bowl"--please elaborate. I've never heard this.
Cheers!
01-10-2017 12:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Phil Lacio Offline
Banned

Posts: 493
Joined: Dec 2016
I Root For: Ghetto State U.
Location:
Post: #62
RE: Playoff $
(01-10-2017 12:49 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(01-09-2017 06:20 PM)Tigersmoke3 Wrote:  
(01-09-2017 06:03 PM)8BitPirate Wrote:  
(01-09-2017 01:43 PM)Tigersmoke3 Wrote:  
(01-09-2017 01:03 PM)Chappy Wrote:  Basically, here is the breakdown from last year:


The above article is only dealing with the part I bolded, which is where "group of five" comes from. If we ever truly want there to be a group of four, we need to get a contract with one of those bowls, but let's not go down that path in this thread please.

edit - now that I read it again, I think that item 2 includes item 1, based on the "base combined with the full academic performance pool" language.
This is what I've been curious about, if the AAC were to buy the cotton bowl would that not make us p6 instantly? Isn't that basically what the ACC did to garuantee their inclusion in the power structure when they bought the Orange bowl

The AAC should quietly gather the resources together and attempt this. Hell I'd kick in a few shekels to see that happen.
I think the AAC was offered the chance to start a contract bowl and or convince one to add us on their own (which did not happen). We could shock the sports world if we can find a good loan officer 05-mafia

"I think the AAC was offered the chance to start a contract Bowl"--please elaborate. I've never heard this.
Cheers!

I inquired about the same thing, but have yet to receive a response.
01-10-2017 01:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tigersmoke3 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 932
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 29
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #63
RE: Playoff $
(01-10-2017 01:05 PM)Phil Lacio Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 12:49 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(01-09-2017 06:20 PM)Tigersmoke3 Wrote:  
(01-09-2017 06:03 PM)8BitPirate Wrote:  
(01-09-2017 01:43 PM)Tigersmoke3 Wrote:  This is what I've been curious about, if the AAC were to buy the cotton bowl would that not make us p6 instantly? Isn't that basically what the ACC did to garuantee their inclusion in the power structure when they bought the Orange bowl

The AAC should quietly gather the resources together and attempt this. Hell I'd kick in a few shekels to see that happen.
I think the AAC was offered the chance to start a contract bowl and or convince one to add us on their own (which did not happen). We could shock the sports world if we can find a good loan officer 05-mafia

"I think the AAC was offered the chance to start a contract Bowl"--please elaborate. I've never heard this.
Cheers!

I inquired about the same thing, but have yet to receive a response.

Well I did say that I wasn't sure but if you go up a few posts Frank the Tank cleared it up
01-10-2017 01:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SublimeKnight Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,711
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 328
I Root For: UCF
Location: ATL
Post: #64
RE: Playoff $
This thread gave me an idea. I contacted CBS about buying a share of the Big Bang Theory for $500k, where-in I'd replace the actor playing Leonard and they'd pay me $1M an episode. So far I haven't heard back, I'll keep everyone posted.
01-10-2017 01:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tigersmoke3 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 932
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 29
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #65
RE: Playoff $
(01-10-2017 12:21 PM)Phil Lacio Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 10:48 AM)SublimeKnight Wrote:  
(01-09-2017 01:03 PM)Chappy Wrote:  Basically, here is the breakdown from last year:

Quote:The following estimates of the CFP revenue distribution are based on preliminary calculations for the 2015-2016 season and are only approximate projections of potential revenue distribution from each component:

(1) Each conference will receive $300,000 for each of its schools when the school’s football team meets the NCAA’s APR for participation in a post-season football game. Each independent institution will also receive the $300,000 when its football team meets that standard.

(2) Each of the 10 conferences will also receive a base amount. For conferences that have contracts for their champions to participate in the Orange, Rose or Sugar Bowl, the base combined with the full academic performance pool will be approximately $51 million for each conference. The five conferences that do not have contracts for their champions to participate in the Orange, Rose or Sugar Bowls will receive approximately $79 million in aggregate (full academic pool plus base), which the conferences will distribute as they choose. Notre Dame will receive a payment of $2.58 million if it meets the APR standard; the other two independents will share $618,241.

(3) A conference will receive $6 million for each team that is selected for the semifinal games. There will be no additional distribution to conferences whose teams qualify for the national championship game. A conference will receive $4 million for each team that plays in a non-playoff bowl under the arrangement (in 2014-2015, the Cotton, Fiesta and Peach Bowls).

(4) Each conference whose team participates in a playoff semifinal, Cotton, Fiesta or Peach Bowl, or in the national championship game will receive $2.08 million to cover expenses for each game. Additionally, certain conferences in the Football Championship Subdivision conferences will receive
$2.34 million in aggregate.

The above article is only dealing with the part I bolded, which is where "group of five" comes from. If we ever truly want there to be a group of four, we need to get a contract with one of those bowls, but let's not go down that path in this thread please.

edit - now that I read it again, I think that item 2 includes item 1, based on the "base combined with the full academic performance pool" language.

I think it's comical how they set up this distribution. Most of the interest in the college football postseason is now the 3 playoff games. The vast majority of the windfall of cash from this contract is for those 3 games. Yet if a "G5" team was somehow able to make the playoffs, even win the national championship, they'd receive $2M more than if they went to the table-scraps NY6 bowl game.

I also don't get the concept of "buying the cotton bowl". Having a contract for a bowl game pays $50M/yr under this setup. It should cost 100s of millions of dollars to buy our way into something like that.

The peach and cotton bowl aren't $50 million dollar conference payout bowls, but buying them and making them AAC contract anchor bowls or arranging that via contract with those bowl owners would definitely improve our image. Right now, both bowls have no conference tie ins and are designated at large/G5 status.
I agree maybe the "buy the cotton bowl " term is not accurate. Maybe we should be trying to buy into the cotton bowl by offering to garuantee or payout by purchasing the sponsors ourselves and then reselling that ourselves to our own corporate sponsors. I'm not sure but if im right then the cotton bowl becomes part of the access bowl group and most importantly we become instantly p6 with a 51 million dollar yearly payout, also wouldn't that then create a bidding war for the last power conference available? I'm open to be proven wrong, I'm just asking questions 04-cheers
01-10-2017 01:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PT_american Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,225
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 8
I Root For: American
Location:
Post: #66
RE: Playoff $
(01-10-2017 01:22 PM)Tigersmoke3 Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 12:21 PM)Phil Lacio Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 10:48 AM)SublimeKnight Wrote:  
(01-09-2017 01:03 PM)Chappy Wrote:  Basically, here is the breakdown from last year:

Quote:The following estimates of the CFP revenue distribution are based on preliminary calculations for the 2015-2016 season and are only approximate projections of potential revenue distribution from each component:

(1) Each conference will receive $300,000 for each of its schools when the school’s football team meets the NCAA’s APR for participation in a post-season football game. Each independent institution will also receive the $300,000 when its football team meets that standard.

(2) Each of the 10 conferences will also receive a base amount. For conferences that have contracts for their champions to participate in the Orange, Rose or Sugar Bowl, the base combined with the full academic performance pool will be approximately $51 million for each conference. The five conferences that do not have contracts for their champions to participate in the Orange, Rose or Sugar Bowls will receive approximately $79 million in aggregate (full academic pool plus base), which the conferences will distribute as they choose. Notre Dame will receive a payment of $2.58 million if it meets the APR standard; the other two independents will share $618,241.

(3) A conference will receive $6 million for each team that is selected for the semifinal games. There will be no additional distribution to conferences whose teams qualify for the national championship game. A conference will receive $4 million for each team that plays in a non-playoff bowl under the arrangement (in 2014-2015, the Cotton, Fiesta and Peach Bowls).

(4) Each conference whose team participates in a playoff semifinal, Cotton, Fiesta or Peach Bowl, or in the national championship game will receive $2.08 million to cover expenses for each game. Additionally, certain conferences in the Football Championship Subdivision conferences will receive
$2.34 million in aggregate.

The above article is only dealing with the part I bolded, which is where "group of five" comes from. If we ever truly want there to be a group of four, we need to get a contract with one of those bowls, but let's not go down that path in this thread please.

edit - now that I read it again, I think that item 2 includes item 1, based on the "base combined with the full academic performance pool" language.

I think it's comical how they set up this distribution. Most of the interest in the college football postseason is now the 3 playoff games. The vast majority of the windfall of cash from this contract is for those 3 games. Yet if a "G5" team was somehow able to make the playoffs, even win the national championship, they'd receive $2M more than if they went to the table-scraps NY6 bowl game.

I also don't get the concept of "buying the cotton bowl". Having a contract for a bowl game pays $50M/yr under this setup. It should cost 100s of millions of dollars to buy our way into something like that.

The peach and cotton bowl aren't $50 million dollar conference payout bowls, but buying them and making them AAC contract anchor bowls or arranging that via contract with those bowl owners would definitely improve our image. Right now, both bowls have no conference tie ins and are designated at large/G5 status.
I agree maybe the "buy the cotton bowl " term is not accurate. Maybe we should be trying to buy into the cotton bowl by offering to garuantee or payout by purchasing the sponsors ourselves and then reselling that ourselves to our own corporate sponsors. I'm not sure but if im right then the cotton bowl becomes part of the access bowl group and most importantly we become instantly p6 with a 51 million dollar yearly payout, also wouldn't that then create a bidding war for the last power conference available? I'm open to be proven wrong, I'm just asking questions 04-cheers

The Orange while it has a contract with the ACC is contracted to pay substantially less than the sugar and rose. Details below. So I think the league should push for a similar deal with the cotton or peach where maybe the league takes half just to get into the game.

Details
The Atlantic Coast Conference and the Discover Orange Bowl have finalized a 12-year deal placing the ACC champion annually in the bowl against either an SEC or Big Ten team, or Notre Dame, starting Jan. 1, 2015.

The agreement was announced Thursday. ESPN will pay an average of $55 million annually for the bowl, sources said.

The $55 million figure will be split evenly between the ACC and the SEC or Big Ten, depending on which conference is represented in the Orange Bowl. However, when Notre Dame plays in the bowl, the Fighting Irish will receive a "significant amount less" than the $27.5 million payout the SEC or Big Ten will get, sources said.

meanwhile the sugar and rose pay this
ESPN will pay $80 million a year to televise the Sugar Bowl, sources said. That's the same amount ESPN will pay annually for the Rose Bowl. The Orange Bowl is expected to cost $55 million, sources said.
01-10-2017 04:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tigersmoke3 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 932
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 29
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #67
RE: Playoff $
(01-10-2017 04:10 PM)PT_american Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 01:22 PM)Tigersmoke3 Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 12:21 PM)Phil Lacio Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 10:48 AM)SublimeKnight Wrote:  
(01-09-2017 01:03 PM)Chappy Wrote:  Basically, here is the breakdown from last year:


The above article is only dealing with the part I bolded, which is where "group of five" comes from. If we ever truly want there to be a group of four, we need to get a contract with one of those bowls, but let's not go down that path in this thread please.

edit - now that I read it again, I think that item 2 includes item 1, based on the "base combined with the full academic performance pool" language.

I think it's comical how they set up this distribution. Most of the interest in the college football postseason is now the 3 playoff games. The vast majority of the windfall of cash from this contract is for those 3 games. Yet if a "G5" team was somehow able to make the playoffs, even win the national championship, they'd receive $2M more than if they went to the table-scraps NY6 bowl game.

I also don't get the concept of "buying the cotton bowl". Having a contract for a bowl game pays $50M/yr under this setup. It should cost 100s of millions of dollars to buy our way into something like that.

The peach and cotton bowl aren't $50 million dollar conference payout bowls, but buying them and making them AAC contract anchor bowls or arranging that via contract with those bowl owners would definitely improve our image. Right now, both bowls have no conference tie ins and are designated at large/G5 status.
I agree maybe the "buy the cotton bowl " term is not accurate. Maybe we should be trying to buy into the cotton bowl by offering to garuantee or payout by purchasing the sponsors ourselves and then reselling that ourselves to our own corporate sponsors. I'm not sure but if im right then the cotton bowl becomes part of the access bowl group and most importantly we become instantly p6 with a 51 million dollar yearly payout, also wouldn't that then create a bidding war for the last power conference available? I'm open to be proven wrong, I'm just asking questions 04-cheers

The Orange while it has a contract with the ACC is contracted to pay substantially less than the sugar and rose. Details below. So I think the league should push for a similar deal with the cotton or peach where maybe the league takes half just to get into the game.

Details
The Atlantic Coast Conference and the Discover Orange Bowl have finalized a 12-year deal placing the ACC champion annually in the bowl against either an SEC or Big Ten team, or Notre Dame, starting Jan. 1, 2015.

The agreement was announced Thursday. ESPN will pay an average of $55 million annually for the bowl, sources said.

The $55 million figure will be split evenly between the ACC and the SEC or Big Ten, depending on which conference is represented in the Orange Bowl. However, when Notre Dame plays in the bowl, the Fighting Irish will receive a "significant amount less" than the $27.5 million payout the SEC or Big Ten will get, sources said.

meanwhile the sugar and rose pay this
ESPN will pay $80 million a year to televise the Sugar Bowl, sources said. That's the same amount ESPN will pay annually for the Rose Bowl. The Orange Bowl is expected to cost $55 million, sources said.

So what we have to do is find a way to bridge the gap between the money and the power through out of the box thinking. I can see our presidents telling Aresco to go to the Cotton and Peach Bowls and gauge their interest in becoming our anchor bowl if we can raise the corporate ad dollars ourselves to cover their payout to us. If either is interested them Aresco can finally earn his million a year pay by meet with the corporate people that were willing to pay big bucks for their particular programs to get in big12 and put together a sponsorship package to make it work (thereby creating the market forces that Frank the Tank was referring to) and BOOM money meet power. Win for us,win for one of the bowls (basically a free team every year) and a win for our corporate sponsors by becoming involved with a P6 bowl while promoting their business interests and helping their chosen programs. Whew I'm off my soapbox lol04-bow
01-10-2017 09:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Phil Lacio Offline
Banned

Posts: 493
Joined: Dec 2016
I Root For: Ghetto State U.
Location:
Post: #68
RE: Playoff $
(01-10-2017 09:49 PM)Tigersmoke3 Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 04:10 PM)PT_american Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 01:22 PM)Tigersmoke3 Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 12:21 PM)Phil Lacio Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 10:48 AM)SublimeKnight Wrote:  I think it's comical how they set up this distribution. Most of the interest in the college football postseason is now the 3 playoff games. The vast majority of the windfall of cash from this contract is for those 3 games. Yet if a "G5" team was somehow able to make the playoffs, even win the national championship, they'd receive $2M more than if they went to the table-scraps NY6 bowl game.

I also don't get the concept of "buying the cotton bowl". Having a contract for a bowl game pays $50M/yr under this setup. It should cost 100s of millions of dollars to buy our way into something like that.

The peach and cotton bowl aren't $50 million dollar conference payout bowls, but buying them and making them AAC contract anchor bowls or arranging that via contract with those bowl owners would definitely improve our image. Right now, both bowls have no conference tie ins and are designated at large/G5 status.
I agree maybe the "buy the cotton bowl " term is not accurate. Maybe we should be trying to buy into the cotton bowl by offering to garuantee or payout by purchasing the sponsors ourselves and then reselling that ourselves to our own corporate sponsors. I'm not sure but if im right then the cotton bowl becomes part of the access bowl group and most importantly we become instantly p6 with a 51 million dollar yearly payout, also wouldn't that then create a bidding war for the last power conference available? I'm open to be proven wrong, I'm just asking questions 04-cheers

The Orange while it has a contract with the ACC is contracted to pay substantially less than the sugar and rose. Details below. So I think the league should push for a similar deal with the cotton or peach where maybe the league takes half just to get into the game.

Details
The Atlantic Coast Conference and the Discover Orange Bowl have finalized a 12-year deal placing the ACC champion annually in the bowl against either an SEC or Big Ten team, or Notre Dame, starting Jan. 1, 2015.

The agreement was announced Thursday. ESPN will pay an average of $55 million annually for the bowl, sources said.

The $55 million figure will be split evenly between the ACC and the SEC or Big Ten, depending on which conference is represented in the Orange Bowl. However, when Notre Dame plays in the bowl, the Fighting Irish will receive a "significant amount less" than the $27.5 million payout the SEC or Big Ten will get, sources said.

meanwhile the sugar and rose pay this
ESPN will pay $80 million a year to televise the Sugar Bowl, sources said. That's the same amount ESPN will pay annually for the Rose Bowl. The Orange Bowl is expected to cost $55 million, sources said.

So what we have to do is find a way to bridge the gap between the money and the power through out of the box thinking. I can see our presidents telling Aresco to go to the Cotton and Peach Bowls and gauge their interest in becoming our anchor bowl if we can raise the corporate ad dollars ourselves to cover their payout to us. If either is interested them Aresco can finally earn his million a year pay by meet with the corporate people that were willing to pay big bucks for their particular programs to get in big12 and put together a sponsorship package to make it work (thereby creating the market forces that Frank the Tank was referring to) and BOOM money meet power. Win for us,win for one of the bowls (basically a free team every year) and a win for our corporate sponsors by becoming involved with a P6 bowl while promoting their business interests and helping their chosen programs. Whew I'm off my soapbox lol04-bow


Basically...


Make those billionaires in Houston and FedEx step to the table with some of that money they've been promising.
01-10-2017 10:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tigersmoke3 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 932
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 29
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #69
RE: Playoff $
(01-10-2017 10:02 PM)Phil Lacio Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 09:49 PM)Tigersmoke3 Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 04:10 PM)PT_american Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 01:22 PM)Tigersmoke3 Wrote:  
(01-10-2017 12:21 PM)Phil Lacio Wrote:  The peach and cotton bowl aren't $50 million dollar conference payout bowls, but buying them and making them AAC contract anchor bowls or arranging that via contract with those bowl owners would definitely improve our image. Right now, both bowls have no conference tie ins and are designated at large/G5 status.
I agree maybe the "buy the cotton bowl " term is not accurate. Maybe we should be trying to buy into the cotton bowl by offering to garuantee or payout by purchasing the sponsors ourselves and then reselling that ourselves to our own corporate sponsors. I'm not sure but if im right then the cotton bowl becomes part of the access bowl group and most importantly we become instantly p6 with a 51 million dollar yearly payout, also wouldn't that then create a bidding war for the last power conference available? I'm open to be proven wrong, I'm just asking questions 04-cheers

The Orange while it has a contract with the ACC is contracted to pay substantially less than the sugar and rose. Details below. So I think the league should push for a similar deal with the cotton or peach where maybe the league takes half just to get into the game.

Details
The Atlantic Coast Conference and the Discover Orange Bowl have finalized a 12-year deal placing the ACC champion annually in the bowl against either an SEC or Big Ten team, or Notre Dame, starting Jan. 1, 2015.

The agreement was announced Thursday. ESPN will pay an average of $55 million annually for the bowl, sources said.

The $55 million figure will be split evenly between the ACC and the SEC or Big Ten, depending on which conference is represented in the Orange Bowl. However, when Notre Dame plays in the bowl, the Fighting Irish will receive a "significant amount less" than the $27.5 million payout the SEC or Big Ten will get, sources said.

meanwhile the sugar and rose pay this
ESPN will pay $80 million a year to televise the Sugar Bowl, sources said. That's the same amount ESPN will pay annually for the Rose Bowl. The Orange Bowl is expected to cost $55 million, sources said.

So what we have to do is find a way to bridge the gap between the money and the power through out of the box thinking. I can see our presidents telling Aresco to go to the Cotton and Peach Bowls and gauge their interest in becoming our anchor bowl if we can raise the corporate ad dollars ourselves to cover their payout to us. If either is interested them Aresco can finally earn his million a year pay by meet with the corporate people that were willing to pay big bucks for their particular programs to get in big12 and put together a sponsorship package to make it work (thereby creating the market forces that Frank the Tank was referring to) and BOOM money meet power. Win for us,win for one of the bowls (basically a free team every year) and a win for our corporate sponsors by becoming involved with a P6 bowl while promoting their business interests and helping their chosen programs. Whew I'm off my soapbox lol04-bow


Basically...


Make those billionaires in Houston and FedEx step to the table with some of that money they've been promising.
I totally agree and I think if it's presented and packaged right probably do able. As a lot of Memphis people have tried to explain it's not that FedEx was lying but he wants to sponsor a power conference that includes Memphis and I'm sure the Houston billionaire feel the same 04-cheers
01-10-2017 10:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fox Offline
Banned

Posts: 10
Joined: Jan 2017
I Root For: Ohio State
Location:
Post: #70
RE: Playoff $
EXCUSE THIS INTERUPTION :

USER TIGER SMOKE IS STILL ON THE BOARD AND HASN'T BEEN BANNED.

HE IS AN INTEGRATED TROLL WHO GOES BY BIG EAST HOMER, ACC FOR LIFE, AMONG OTHER USERNAMES.

HE OFTEN RATES HIMSELF HIGHLY AMONGST THESE USERNAMES (LOOK AT HIS PROFILE FOR PROOF).

HIS FOOTBALL KNOWLEDGE IS VERY POOR AS WELL, WHICH LARGELY INDICATES A CHILDISH TROLL.

PLEASE BE CAREFUL WHEN ENCOUNTERING THIS VISCIOUS USER AND OTHER USERNAMES ASSOCIATED WITH HIS ACCOUNT
01-11-2017 10:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Westhoff123 Offline
Dr. Doom
*

Posts: 11,291
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 208
I Root For: UH
Location: Houston, TX
Post: #71
Playoff $
(01-11-2017 10:10 PM)Fox Wrote:  EXCUSE THIS INTERUPTION :

USER TIGER SMOKE IS STILL ON THE BOARD AND HASN'T BEEN BANNED.

HE IS AN INTEGRATED TROLL WHO GOES BY BIG EAST HOMER, ACC FOR LIFE, AMONG OTHER USERNAMES.

HE OFTEN RATES HIMSELF HIGHLY AMONGST THESE USERNAMES (LOOK AT HIS PROFILE FOR PROOF).

HIS FOOTBALL KNOWLEDGE IS VERY POOR AS WELL, WHICH LARGELY INDICATES A CHILDISH TROLL.

PLEASE BE CAREFUL WHEN ENCOUNTERING THIS VISCIOUS USER AND OTHER USERNAMES ASSOCIATED WITH HIS ACCOUNT

Hey mods the trolls have returned.
01-11-2017 10:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Phil Lacio Offline
Banned

Posts: 493
Joined: Dec 2016
I Root For: Ghetto State U.
Location:
Post: #72
RE: Playoff $
(01-11-2017 10:11 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  
(01-11-2017 10:10 PM)Fox Wrote:  EXCUSE THIS INTERUPTION :

USER TIGER SMOKE IS STILL ON THE BOARD AND HASN'T BEEN BANNED.

HE IS AN INTEGRATED TROLL WHO GOES BY BIG EAST HOMER, ACC FOR LIFE, AMONG OTHER USERNAMES.

HE OFTEN RATES HIMSELF HIGHLY AMONGST THESE USERNAMES (LOOK AT HIS PROFILE FOR PROOF).

HIS FOOTBALL KNOWLEDGE IS VERY POOR AS WELL, WHICH LARGELY INDICATES A CHILDISH TROLL.

PLEASE BE CAREFUL WHEN ENCOUNTERING THIS VISCIOUS USER AND OTHER USERNAMES ASSOCIATED WITH HIS ACCOUNT

Hey mods the trolls have returned.


Obvi TrollKingnobe @ Georgia Tech Stormtrooper - "These are not the trolls you are looking for..."

[Image: avatar_77684.jpg?dateline=1484077297]
(This post was last modified: 01-11-2017 11:06 PM by Phil Lacio.)
01-11-2017 10:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tigersmoke3 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 932
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 29
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #73
RE: Playoff $
Great, he just had to mess up a perfectly good Santa wish list thread lol01-lauramac2
01-11-2017 10:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.