These stats are through games played 12/21, so they include a couple bowl games, but not all. http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/team/22

I chose the Total O/D, Rushing O/D, and Passing O/D. I know they are more and people like to debate, but the listed stats are good indicators for offense and defense. They don't necessarily indicate how good your season was or level of competition, etc. USM is a good example of decent stats and poor season.

Yellow highlights highest rated in each category, while red highlights lowest rated in each category.

Offense: Nice that CUSA has 4 of the top 25 total offenses in FBS. 2 in top 5 passing. However, we also have 4 sub 100 offenses in FBS.

Defense: 1 team in top 25 for total D. 4 are sub 100 total D. If WKU had a solid secondary, they'd be sitting with just 1 loss.

[img][/img]

Adding Turnover Margin national ranking...
ODU 4
UNCC 19
Marshall 38
UTSA 48
NT 51
WKU 56
MT 57
LaTech 66
FAU 97
UTEP 97
Rice 108
FIU 116
USM 125

Nice rushing D WKU!

Conveniently left out Turnover Margin I see. LOL!

Turnover Margin

Looks like it was mostly the newbies that valued the ball.

4. ODU +13
19. Charlotte + 7
38. Marshall + 4
48. UTSA + 3
51. North Texas + 2
56. WKU + 2
57. MTSU + 1
66. LA Tech + 1

http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/c...team/29/p1

(12-22-2016 02:41 PM)ODU AGGIE Wrote:  Turnover Margin

Looks like it was mostly the newbies that valued the ball.

4. ODU +13
19. Charlotte + 7
38. Marshall + 4
48. UTSA + 3
51. North Texas + 2
56. WKU + 2
57. MTSU + 1
66. LA Tech + 1

http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/c...team/29/p1

Tied for last place with Purdue is USM at -17 but statistically/per game avg we are 125 because we played 1 more game than they did

(12-22-2016 02:28 PM)USM@FTL Wrote:  Conveniently left out Turnover Margin I see. LOL!

Added now, but yes, originally thought i'd leave out:)