There is so much disinformation and fake news coming out of the the White House, MSM, and politicized U.S. intelligence agencies that at this point it’s impossible to sort out the source of the Hillary campaign emails. Craig Murray’s version is at least as credible as anything coming out of Josh Earnest or the Washington Post.

Quote:A Wikileaks figure is claiming that he received leaked Clinton campaign emails from a “disgusted” Democratic whistleblower, while the White House continued to blame Russian hackers Wednesday for meddling in the election and asserted that Donald Trump was “obviously aware” of Moscow’s efforts on his behalf.

Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, said in the report by the Daily Mail that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September.

He said he received a package in a wooded area near American University.

“Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,” Mr. Murray told the British newspaper. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”

Wikileaks published thousands of emails stolen from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, providing a steady stream of negative news coverage of her during the final weeks of the campaign. Mr. Murray said the leakers were motivated by “disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.”

The Daily Mail report noted that Mr. Murray was removed from his diplomatic post amid allegations of misconduct.

The White House said Wednesday that Donald Trump was “obviously aware” of Russian hacking to benefit his presidential campaign and suggested that the administration didn’t retaliate against Moscow because the U.S. has more to lose than Russia does in an all-out cyberwar.

Referring to Mr. Trump’s offhand snark last summer that maybe Moscow could locate missing emails from Hillary Clinton’s private server, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said the Republican might have viewed Russia’s cyberattacks as helpful to his presidential campaign.

“There was ample evidence that was known long before the election, and in most cases long before October, about the Trump campaign in Russia, everything from the Republican nominee himself calling on Russia to hack his opponent,” Mr. Earnest said. “It might be an indication that he was obviously aware and concluded, based on whatever facts or sources he had available to him, that Russia was involved and their involvement was having a negative impact on his opponent’s campaign.”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016...medium=RSS

What I want to know is whether this disgusted democrat is dead or alive right now?