(12-01-2016 02:06 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote: On the field results, hmm, what about Houston which whipped Oklahoma and demolished Louisville?
Your admitted hard on for anything anti-Louisville is humorous. Just a few problems with your question.
How about the fact that Houston doesn't play in a league with a contract with the Orange Bowl. Also might want to tell Houston they need to show up for conference games and not lose to AAC teams that beat UH but are inferior to OU and UofL.
(11-30-2016 09:58 PM)Dasville Wrote: We do not deserve the Orange. We lost to UK. Everyone that respects college football knows that. We will be lucky to get the Citrus. We probably don't deserve it.
1 game doesn't make a season. Why would a team Louisville beat by 43 deserve it more? Through 10 games of the season Louisville was in the CFP discussion, FSU wasn't. You can make a case for both teams. Let's wait & see what the committee says Sunday.
There is no case to be made. Even the NCAA basketball committee gives weight to the last 10 games of the basketball season.
Truth of the matter is this, no matter what part of the season you lose to UK, that loss tanks your season and post season. South Carolina fired their coach partly because of UK loss. If Georgia loses to UK, Kirby is on the hot seat in his first season.
It is what it is. We will not get the Orange under any circumstance and should feel fortunate if we get the Citrus. We will have no problem selling tickets for a Florida Bowl against a SEC west team over a game against IU.
Fortunate enough to get the Citrus? We're 2 in the ACC!
Kentucky lost to Southern Miss, I would give you the Houston lose but Kentucky? Nope that puts y'all at best third for bowls maybe fourth behind VT.
Now wait, why are we giving some teams credit for improving (Penn St, USC, FSU) during the season but not others (UK)? Kentucky finished tied for 3rd in the SEC East & 7-5. We didn't lose to Rutgers or Kansas.
(12-01-2016 02:06 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote: On the field results, hmm, what about Houston which whipped Oklahoma and demolished Louisville?
(11-30-2016 07:46 PM)Ewglenn Wrote: Y'all lost your NY6 bowl last weekend
Probably but not definitely.
We do not deserve the Orange. We lost to UK. Everyone that respects college football knows that. We will be lucky to get the Citrus. We probably don't deserve it.
1 game doesn't make a season. Why would a team Louisville beat by 43 deserve it more? Through 10 games of the season Louisville was in the CFP discussion, FSU wasn't. You can make a case for both teams. Let's wait & see what the committee says Sunday.
There is no case to be made. Even the NCAA basketball committee gives weight to the last 10 games of the basketball season.
Truth of the matter is this, no matter what part of the season you lose to UK, that loss tanks your season and post season. South Carolina fired their coach partly because of UK loss. If Georgia loses to UK, Kirby is on the hot seat in his first season.
It is what it is. We will not get the Orange under any circumstance and should feel fortunate if we get the Citrus. We will have no problem selling tickets for a Florida Bowl against a SEC west team over a game against IU.
They did? When? South Carolina hasn't fired a coach since 1998.
(11-30-2016 10:12 PM)Lenvillecards Wrote: 1 game doesn't make a season. Why would a team Louisville beat by 43 deserve it more? Through 10 games of the season Louisville was in the CFP discussion, FSU wasn't. You can make a case for both teams. Let's wait & see what the committee says Sunday.
There is no case to be made. Even the NCAA basketball committee gives weight to the last 10 games of the basketball season.
Truth of the matter is this, no matter what part of the season you lose to UK, that loss tanks your season and post season. South Carolina fired their coach partly because of UK loss. If Georgia loses to UK, Kirby is on the hot seat in his first season.
It is what it is. We will not get the Orange under any circumstance and should feel fortunate if we get the Citrus. We will have no problem selling tickets for a Florida Bowl against a SEC west team over a game against IU.
Fortunate enough to get the Citrus? We're 2 in the ACC!
Kentucky lost to Southern Miss, I would give you the Houston lose but Kentucky? Nope that puts y'all at best third for bowls maybe fourth behind VT.
Now wait, why are we giving some teams credit for improving (Penn St, USC, FSU) during the season but not others (UK)? Kentucky finished tied for 3rd in the SEC East & 7-5. We didn't lose to Rutgers or Kansas.
Even more than Vandy and Missouri, Uk is the symbol of football failure. I know, I know we lost to them. That is why we deserve nothing. I will make a wager right now....
if Uk defeats Florida next season, McElwain will be fired. If Kirby loses to Stoops next year, he will be on the hot seat.
It is what it is.
(12-01-2016 02:06 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote: On the field results, hmm, what about Houston which whipped Oklahoma and demolished Louisville?
Your admitted hard on for anything anti-Louisville is humorous. Just a few problems with your question.
How about the fact that Houston doesn't play in a league with a contract with the Orange Bowl. Also might want to tell Houston they need to show up for conference games and not lose to AAC teams that beat UH but are inferior to OU and UofL.
I was obviously referring to the laughable argument presented about head to head results.
(12-01-2016 02:06 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote: On the field results, hmm, what about Houston which whipped Oklahoma and demolished Louisville?
(11-30-2016 09:47 PM)Lenvillecards Wrote: Probably but not definitely.
We do not deserve the Orange. We lost to UK. Everyone that respects college football knows that. We will be lucky to get the Citrus. We probably don't deserve it.
1 game doesn't make a season. Why would a team Louisville beat by 43 deserve it more? Through 10 games of the season Louisville was in the CFP discussion, FSU wasn't. You can make a case for both teams. Let's wait & see what the committee says Sunday.
There is no case to be made. Even the NCAA basketball committee gives weight to the last 10 games of the basketball season.
Truth of the matter is this, no matter what part of the season you lose to UK, that loss tanks your season and post season. South Carolina fired their coach partly because of UK loss. If Georgia loses to UK, Kirby is on the hot seat in his first season.
It is what it is. We will not get the Orange under any circumstance and should feel fortunate if we get the Citrus. We will have no problem selling tickets for a Florida Bowl against a SEC west team over a game against IU.
They did? When? South Carolina hasn't fired a coach since 1998.
Your right! South Carolina did not fire The old ball coach. In his resignation speech he said once they were 2-2 he knew it was time for him to go. He knew it was time when he lost to UK.
It is what it is.
Steve Spurrier was a smart coach and can reckognize a historic football reality.
(11-30-2016 09:58 PM)Dasville Wrote: We do not deserve the Orange. We lost to UK. Everyone that respects college football knows that. We will be lucky to get the Citrus. We probably don't deserve it.
1 game doesn't make a season. Why would a team Louisville beat by 43 deserve it more? Through 10 games of the season Louisville was in the CFP discussion, FSU wasn't. You can make a case for both teams. Let's wait & see what the committee says Sunday.
There is no case to be made. Even the NCAA basketball committee gives weight to the last 10 games of the basketball season.
Truth of the matter is this, no matter what part of the season you lose to UK, that loss tanks your season and post season. South Carolina fired their coach partly because of UK loss. If Georgia loses to UK, Kirby is on the hot seat in his first season.
It is what it is. We will not get the Orange under any circumstance and should feel fortunate if we get the Citrus. We will have no problem selling tickets for a Florida Bowl against a SEC west team over a game against IU.
They did? When? South Carolina hasn't fired a coach since 1998.
Your right! South Carolina did not fire The old ball coach. In his resignation speech he said once they were 2-2 he knew it was time for him to go. He knew it was time when he lost to UK.
It is what it is.
Steve Spurrier was a smart coach and can reckognize a historic football reality.
He wanted to retire after the previous season and the AD Ray Tanner talked him into one more year. The idea that losing to Kentucky in game two is what caused him to retire after game six is an asinine attempt by you to smear your rival with absolutely no basis in fact.
(11-30-2016 10:12 PM)Lenvillecards Wrote: 1 game doesn't make a season. Why would a team Louisville beat by 43 deserve it more? Through 10 games of the season Louisville was in the CFP discussion, FSU wasn't. You can make a case for both teams. Let's wait & see what the committee says Sunday.
There is no case to be made. Even the NCAA basketball committee gives weight to the last 10 games of the basketball season.
Truth of the matter is this, no matter what part of the season you lose to UK, that loss tanks your season and post season. South Carolina fired their coach partly because of UK loss. If Georgia loses to UK, Kirby is on the hot seat in his first season.
It is what it is. We will not get the Orange under any circumstance and should feel fortunate if we get the Citrus. We will have no problem selling tickets for a Florida Bowl against a SEC west team over a game against IU.
They did? When? South Carolina hasn't fired a coach since 1998.
Your right! South Carolina did not fire The old ball coach. In his resignation speech he said once they were 2-2 he knew it was time for him to go. He knew it was time when he lost to UK.
It is what it is.
Steve Spurrier was a smart coach and can reckognize a historic football reality.
He wanted to retire after the previous season and the AD Ray Tanner talked him into one more year. The idea that losing to Kentucky in game two is what caused him to retire after game six is an asinine attempt by you to smear your rival with absolutely no basis in fact.
(11-30-2016 10:12 PM)Lenvillecards Wrote: 1 game doesn't make a season. Why would a team Louisville beat by 43 deserve it more? Through 10 games of the season Louisville was in the CFP discussion, FSU wasn't. You can make a case for both teams. Let's wait & see what the committee says Sunday.
There is no case to be made. Even the NCAA basketball committee gives weight to the last 10 games of the basketball season.
Truth of the matter is this, no matter what part of the season you lose to UK, that loss tanks your season and post season. South Carolina fired their coach partly because of UK loss. If Georgia loses to UK, Kirby is on the hot seat in his first season.
It is what it is. We will not get the Orange under any circumstance and should feel fortunate if we get the Citrus. We will have no problem selling tickets for a Florida Bowl against a SEC west team over a game against IU.
They did? When? South Carolina hasn't fired a coach since 1998.
Your right! South Carolina did not fire The old ball coach. In his resignation speech he said once they were 2-2 he knew it was time for him to go. He knew it was time when he lost to UK.
It is what it is.
Steve Spurrier was a smart coach and can reckognize a historic football reality.
He wanted to retire after the previous season and the AD Ray Tanner talked him into one more year. The idea that losing to Kentucky in game two is what caused him to retire after game six is an asinine attempt by you to smear your rival with absolutely no basis in fact.
The old ball coach lost to UK in 2014 and 2015. He beat Georgia in 2014 and lost to them in 2015.
At 2-2 he knew it was time to go. A loss to Georgia does not mean it's time to go.
Back to back losses to UK means it's time for a coach to go. It's not me or UofL saying this....it is just truth. It is what the SEC says.
(11-30-2016 10:32 PM)Dasville Wrote: There is no case to be made. Even the NCAA basketball committee gives weight to the last 10 games of the basketball season.
Truth of the matter is this, no matter what part of the season you lose to UK, that loss tanks your season and post season. South Carolina fired their coach partly because of UK loss. If Georgia loses to UK, Kirby is on the hot seat in his first season.
It is what it is. We will not get the Orange under any circumstance and should feel fortunate if we get the Citrus. We will have no problem selling tickets for a Florida Bowl against a SEC west team over a game against IU.
They did? When? South Carolina hasn't fired a coach since 1998.
Your right! South Carolina did not fire The old ball coach. In his resignation speech he said once they were 2-2 he knew it was time for him to go. He knew it was time when he lost to UK.
It is what it is.
Steve Spurrier was a smart coach and can reckognize a historic football reality.
He wanted to retire after the previous season and the AD Ray Tanner talked him into one more year. The idea that losing to Kentucky in game two is what caused him to retire after game six is an asinine attempt by you to smear your rival with absolutely no basis in fact.
The old ball coach lost to UK in 2014 and 2015. He beat Georgia in 2014 and lost to them in 2015.
At 2-2 he knew it was time to go. A loss to Georgia does not mean it's time to go.
Back to back losses to UK means it's time for a coach to go. It's not me or UofL saying this....it is just truth. It is what the SEC says.
Except he didn't quit when he was 2-2. He quit when he was 2-4.
Just stop. Everybody can see you made a false statement and are now just throwing up dust trying to save face and failing miserably.
(12-01-2016 04:28 PM)Kaplony Wrote: They did? When? South Carolina hasn't fired a coach since 1998.
Your right! South Carolina did not fire The old ball coach. In his resignation speech he said once they were 2-2 he knew it was time for him to go. He knew it was time when he lost to UK.
It is what it is.
Steve Spurrier was a smart coach and can reckognize a historic football reality.
He wanted to retire after the previous season and the AD Ray Tanner talked him into one more year. The idea that losing to Kentucky in game two is what caused him to retire after game six is an asinine attempt by you to smear your rival with absolutely no basis in fact.
The old ball coach lost to UK in 2014 and 2015. He beat Georgia in 2014 and lost to them in 2015.
At 2-2 he knew it was time to go. A loss to Georgia does not mean it's time to go.
Back to back losses to UK means it's time for a coach to go. It's not me or UofL saying this....it is just truth. It is what the SEC says.
Except he didn't quit when he was 2-2. He quit when he was 2-4.
Just stop. Everybody can see you made a false statement and are now just throwing up dust trying to save face and failing miserably.
Not everybody will, but anybody can, watch his resignation speech.
The ol' ball coach explained when he knew it was time.
Actual links are not dust IMO.
(12-01-2016 06:23 PM)Dasville Wrote: Your right! South Carolina did not fire The old ball coach. In his resignation speech he said once they were 2-2 he knew it was time for him to go. He knew it was time when he lost to UK.
It is what it is.
Steve Spurrier was a smart coach and can reckognize a historic football reality.
He wanted to retire after the previous season and the AD Ray Tanner talked him into one more year. The idea that losing to Kentucky in game two is what caused him to retire after game six is an asinine attempt by you to smear your rival with absolutely no basis in fact.
The old ball coach lost to UK in 2014 and 2015. He beat Georgia in 2014 and lost to them in 2015.
At 2-2 he knew it was time to go. A loss to Georgia does not mean it's time to go.
Back to back losses to UK means it's time for a coach to go. It's not me or UofL saying this....it is just truth. It is what the SEC says.
Except he didn't quit when he was 2-2. He quit when he was 2-4.
Just stop. Everybody can see you made a false statement and are now just throwing up dust trying to save face and failing miserably.
Not everybody will, but anybody can, watch his resignation speech.
The ol' ball coach explained when he knew it was time.
Actual links are not dust IMO.
I watched it both live and since. He didn't mention any specific team except UCF. He did, however, mention that the key factor was his age being used against them on the recruiting trail.
Again, he wanted to call it quits after the 2014 season and Ray Tanner talked him into one more year.
They asked him when he knew. They beat UCF. He said when they were 2-2. A loss to Georgia, especially when they beat them in 2014, is no reason to "resign".
You get fired for losing to UK back to back years if you are SEC. The ol' ball coach knew this heading into 2015.
(12-01-2016 08:10 PM)Dasville Wrote: They asked him when he knew. They beat UCF. He said when they were 2-2. A loss to Georgia, especially when they beat them in 2014, is no reason to "resign".
You get fired for losing to UK back to back years if you are SEC. The ol' ball coach knew this heading into 2015.
It is what it is.
Except he didn't get fired and wouldn't have been fired.
He specifically mentioned after UCF he knew because they were trailing at the half.
Oh and the fact that he didn't really want to coach the team in 2015 to begin with.
And it truly is what it is. What it isn't is what you tried to claim and are only embarrassing yourself trying to continue the narrative when it's been exposed as false.
(12-01-2016 08:10 PM)Dasville Wrote: They asked him when he knew. They beat UCF. He said when they were 2-2. A loss to Georgia, especially when they beat them in 2014, is no reason to "resign".
You get fired for losing to UK back to back years if you are SEC. The ol' ball coach knew this heading into 2015.
It is what it is.
Except he didn't get fired and wouldn't have been fired.
He specifically mentioned after UCF he knew because they were trailing at the half.
Oh and the fact that he didn't really want to coach the team in 2015 to begin with.
And it truly is what it is. What it isn't is what you tried to claim and are only embarrassing yourself trying to continue the narrative when it's been exposed as false.
