18-13

(12-02-2016 10:36 AM)TIGER7880 Wrote:  18-13

Reasonable prediction...

Bump.

If you don't expect too much from me, you might not be let down...


-"Hey Jealousy"
Gin Blossoms

(11-28-2016 07:50 PM)bluebacker Wrote:  19-12

I'm looking accurate.

No, just because I predicted 19-12 doesn't mean I'm happy with 19-12 and a likely 3rd straight year with no postseason.

As the 6 seed though, a win over USF and then over (probably) the 3 seed Houston might garner an NIT bid. If it doesn't look no further than the abysmal strength of schedule.

(03-03-2017 01:18 PM)bluebacker Wrote:  

(11-28-2016 07:50 PM)bluebacker Wrote:  19-12

I'm looking accurate.

No, just because I predicted 19-12 doesn't mean I'm happy with 19-12 and a likely 3rd straight year with no postseason.

As the 6 seed though, a win over USF and then over (probably) the 3 seed Houston might garner an NIT bid. If it doesn't look no further than the abysmal strength of schedule.

21-12 is doable. Doubt that's an NIT bid though. If so, it'll be a low one. BUT...NIT in Year 1 is a success IMO.

NIT should expand.

LOL

(03-03-2017 03:12 PM)HoopDreams Wrote:  NIT should expand.

LOL

More like disband

(03-03-2017 03:14 PM)VinnieVegas Wrote:  

(03-03-2017 03:12 PM)HoopDreams Wrote:  NIT should expand.

LOL

More like disband

Yep

(03-03-2017 03:11 PM)HometownTiger Wrote:  

(03-03-2017 01:18 PM)bluebacker Wrote:  

(11-28-2016 07:50 PM)bluebacker Wrote:  19-12

I'm looking accurate.

No, just because I predicted 19-12 doesn't mean I'm happy with 19-12 and a likely 3rd straight year with no postseason.

As the 6 seed though, a win over USF and then over (probably) the 3 seed Houston might garner an NIT bid. If it doesn't look no further than the abysmal strength of schedule.

21-12 is doable. Doubt that's an NIT bid though. If so, it'll be a low one. BUT...NIT in Year 1 is a success IMO.

They can't go 21-12 without winning at SMU and I don't think that's doable!!

(03-03-2017 03:11 PM)HometownTiger Wrote:  

(03-03-2017 01:18 PM)bluebacker Wrote:  

(11-28-2016 07:50 PM)bluebacker Wrote:  19-12

I'm looking accurate.

No, just because I predicted 19-12 doesn't mean I'm happy with 19-12 and a likely 3rd straight year with no postseason.

As the 6 seed though, a win over USF and then over (probably) the 3 seed Houston might garner an NIT bid. If it doesn't look no further than the abysmal strength of schedule.

21-12 is doable. Doubt that's an NIT bid though. If so, it'll be a low one. BUT...NIT in Year 1 is a success IMO.

Cal made NIT semis his first year and some people were still unhappy. And it was a better tournament then.

(03-03-2017 06:40 PM)tigergg Wrote:  

(03-03-2017 03:11 PM)HometownTiger Wrote:  

(03-03-2017 01:18 PM)bluebacker Wrote:  

(11-28-2016 07:50 PM)bluebacker Wrote:  19-12

I'm looking accurate.

No, just because I predicted 19-12 doesn't mean I'm happy with 19-12 and a likely 3rd straight year with no postseason.

As the 6 seed though, a win over USF and then over (probably) the 3 seed Houston might garner an NIT bid. If it doesn't look no further than the abysmal strength of schedule.

21-12 is doable. Doubt that's an NIT bid though. If so, it'll be a low one. BUT...NIT in Year 1 is a success IMO.

They can't go 21-12 without winning at SMU and I don't think that's doable!!

It is doable because we certainly can beat south Florida and we can beat Houston. That puts the total at 21. Of course the loss total would most likely be 13 then after factoring in the conference tournament. Very doable.

I figured 19 wins.

But I thought we'd have more trouble with size-defending big guys and keeping dedric out of foul trouble.

To offset, we lost a couple of "what the heck" games more than I expected.

(03-03-2017 06:51 PM)TubbyTime Wrote:  

(03-03-2017 06:40 PM)tigergg Wrote:  

(03-03-2017 03:11 PM)HometownTiger Wrote:  

(03-03-2017 01:18 PM)bluebacker Wrote:  

(11-28-2016 07:50 PM)bluebacker Wrote:  19-12

I'm looking accurate.

No, just because I predicted 19-12 doesn't mean I'm happy with 19-12 and a likely 3rd straight year with no postseason.

As the 6 seed though, a win over USF and then over (probably) the 3 seed Houston might garner an NIT bid. If it doesn't look no further than the abysmal strength of schedule.

21-12 is doable. Doubt that's an NIT bid though. If so, it'll be a low one. BUT...NIT in Year 1 is a success IMO.

They can't go 21-12 without winning at SMU and I don't think that's doable!!

It is doable because we certainly can beat south Florida and we can beat Houston. That puts the total at 21. Of course the loss total would most likely be 13 then after factoring in the conference tournament. Very doable.

That was my point on the loss total, can't be 12 unless they win at SMU!

(11-28-2016 08:27 PM)450bench Wrote:  I'd say 20-15 +\- 2 games.

This was my thought originally. How in the hell did I come up with 35 games?

(03-03-2017 08:46 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(11-28-2016 08:27 PM)450bench Wrote:  I'd say 20-15 +\- 2 games.

This was my thought originally. How in the hell did I come up with 35 games?

You can't count?

I figured we'd win 18-20 but I didn't realize our schedule was so bad either. I guess it all works out.

(11-29-2016 10:54 PM)ksigtigerdood Wrote:  22-9

Guess I was a tad bit optimistic. That prediction will sadly be optimistic for next year, too