Top 25 wins

AAC West - 4

All Of The B12 - 3

Top 25 Win Percent

AAC West - 4 of 7 ( 57% )

All of the B12 - 3 of 21 ( 14% )

Suck it.

The AAC West is a beast. Time for UH to go independent and only schedule top 25 teams and no AAC, especially the west. We are undefeated if dont play the W(B)est!

(11-25-2016 06:02 PM)strongv Wrote:  The AAC West is a beast. Time for UH to go independent and only schedule top 25 teams and no AAC, especially the west. We are undefeated if dont play the W(B)est!

You also didn't play the best two teams in the East. Not suggesting that the east is better, just sayin.

The AAC is awesome. If we can get paid our fair market value in the next TV deal, we're going to all be in good shape.

(11-25-2016 05:59 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Top 25 wins

AAC West - 4

All Of The B12 - 3

Top 25 Win Percent

AAC West - 4 of 7 ( 57% )

All of the B12 - 3 of 21 ( 14% )

Suck it.

It will be these type of metrics that Aresco will take to the networks. According to Sagarin, the AAC west outranks the SEC East.

CONFERENCE CENTRAL MEAN SIMPLE AVERAGE TEAMS WIN50%

1 SEC-WEST (A) = 84.29 84.62 ( 1) 7 84.25 ( 1)
2 PAC-12(NORTH) (A) = 79.22 79.45 ( 2) 6 79.36 ( 2)
3 PAC-12(SOUTH) (A) = 78.59 78.02 ( 4) 6 78.32 ( 3)
4 BIG TEN-EAST (A) = 78.13 78.62 ( 3) 7 78.11 ( 4)
5 ACC-COASTAL (A) = 77.75 76.63 ( 6) 7 76.96 ( 5)
6 BIG 12 (A) = 76.90 76.17 ( 7) 10 76.62 ( 7)
7 ACC-ATLANTIC (A) = 76.55 77.04 ( 5) 7 76.75 ( 6)
8 BIG TEN-WEST (A) = 75.48 74.54 ( 8) 7 75.18 ( 8)
9 AAC WEST (A) = 72.60 71.59 ( 10) 6 72.04 ( 10)
10 SEC-EAST (A) = 72.46 73.26 ( 9) 7 73.03 ( 9)
11 MWC-MOUNTAIN (A) = 67.13 67.72 ( 11) 6 67.44 ( 11)
12 AAC EAST (A) = 66.73 66.77 ( 12) 6 66.75 ( 12)
13 I-A INDEPENDENTS (A) = 65.65 65.83 ( 13) 5 65.66 ( 13)
14 MAC-WEST (A) = 64.61 65.71 ( 14) 6 65.09 ( 14)
15 MISSOURI VALLEY (AA)= 57.31 57.21 ( 17) 10 57.25 ( 15)

Heading into this weekend, 4 of the 6 AAC West teams are ranked in the top 50, whereas only 2 of 7 SEC East teams are ranked in the top 50.

The AAC will never come close to the paydays of the current "P5", however there should be no debate the AAC is building a case for compensation worthy of no less than 1/3 of what the Big 12 earns, which should be a minimum of $10 mil per school. TV money is not the only factor to be addressed, bowl ties also deserve improvement. A champion from the West and East not earning a NY6 bowl should not be designated to bowl games that distributes less than $1-$2 mil. is a crime.

I'm not so sure if the AAC maintains this current ascension (3-4 programs knocking on the NY6 bowl mix every November) that a conference auto-bid to a NY6 Bowl should not come into play over the next 3-5 years. Consistency is a true mark of deserved-nous. I have no idea if auto bid structure is subject for amendment mid-term like the Tv deals, but a case for collusion against a deserving conference could seem like a possible argument.

TX

(11-25-2016 08:10 PM)texcane1982 Wrote:  

(11-25-2016 05:59 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Top 25 wins

AAC West - 4

All Of The B12 - 3

Top 25 Win Percent

AAC West - 4 of 7 ( 57% )

All of the B12 - 3 of 21 ( 14% )

Suck it.

It will be these type of metrics that Aresco will take to the networks. According to Sagarin, the AAC west outranks the SEC East.

CONFERENCE CENTRAL MEAN SIMPLE AVERAGE TEAMS WIN50%

1 SEC-WEST (A) = 84.29 84.62 ( 1) 7 84.25 ( 1)
2 PAC-12(NORTH) (A) = 79.22 79.45 ( 2) 6 79.36 ( 2)
3 PAC-12(SOUTH) (A) = 78.59 78.02 ( 4) 6 78.32 ( 3)
4 BIG TEN-EAST (A) = 78.13 78.62 ( 3) 7 78.11 ( 4)
5 ACC-COASTAL (A) = 77.75 76.63 ( 6) 7 76.96 ( 5)
6 BIG 12 (A) = 76.90 76.17 ( 7) 10 76.62 ( 7)
7 ACC-ATLANTIC (A) = 76.55 77.04 ( 5) 7 76.75 ( 6)
8 BIG TEN-WEST (A) = 75.48 74.54 ( 8) 7 75.18 ( 8)
9 AAC WEST (A) = 72.60 71.59 ( 10) 6 72.04 ( 10)
10 SEC-EAST (A) = 72.46 73.26 ( 9) 7 73.03 ( 9)
11 MWC-MOUNTAIN (A) = 67.13 67.72 ( 11) 6 67.44 ( 11)
12 AAC EAST (A) = 66.73 66.77 ( 12) 6 66.75 ( 12)
13 I-A INDEPENDENTS (A) = 65.65 65.83 ( 13) 5 65.66 ( 13)
14 MAC-WEST (A) = 64.61 65.71 ( 14) 6 65.09 ( 14)
15 MISSOURI VALLEY (AA)= 57.31 57.21 ( 17) 10 57.25 ( 15)

Heading into this weekend, 4 of the 6 AAC West teams are ranked in the top 50, whereas only 2 of 7 SEC East teams are ranked in the top 50.

The AAC will never come close to the paydays of the current "P5", however there should be no debate the AAC is building a case for compensation worthy of no less than 1/3 of what the Big 12 earns, which should be a minimum of $10 mil per school. TV money is not the only factor to be addressed, bowl ties also deserve improvement. A champion from the West and East not earning a NY6 bowl should not be designated to bowl games that payout less than $1-$2 mil.

TX

TV cares about how full the stadiums are. It is all about optics for TV. The excitement (sizzle) is what sells, not how strong the teams are. That combined with eyeball numbers is how the league moves up the food chain.

.

(11-25-2016 06:02 PM)strongv Wrote:  The AAC West is a beast. Time for UH to go independent and only schedule top 25 teams and no AAC, especially the west. We are undefeated if dont play the W(B)est!

Bye

(11-25-2016 05:59 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Top 25 wins

AAC West - 4

All Of The B12 - 3

Top 25 Win Percent

AAC West - 4 of 7 ( 57% )

All of the B12 - 3 of 21 ( 14% )

Suck it.

To be fair, the Big 12 will have 4 top 25 wins after the Bedlam game next week. OU and OSU are both top 10 with a bye this week. But the West Division is pretty darn good regardless.

This is the type of information that should not only be posted here but on the conference realignment board. Maybe we have to be the ones who spread the truth about our conference, some people really just don't know and espn damn sure isn't going to do it for us. I think that WMU is being pushed by them to make it seem that all g5s are interchangeable. However once WMU gets skull dragged by a decent p5 team on national television with only a couple of thousand of their fans in attendance it would allow them to paint us all with that narrative again.

(11-25-2016 06:02 PM)strongv Wrote:  The AAC West is a beast. Time for UH to go independent and only schedule top 25 teams and no AAC, especially the west. We are undefeated if dont play the W(B)est!

wish you would, that way Kronke and Red Dragon wouldn't be around to bad mouth the rest of the AAC teams and make excuses when they can't beat them.

Much respect to the west division. It's laughable looking back remembering people were talking about divisions being unbalanced in favor of the East.

P.S. F*** the B12

(11-25-2016 09:53 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  Much respect to the west division. It's laughable looking back remembering people were talking about divisions being unbalanced in favor of the East.

P.S. F*** the B12

What goes around comes around. It will be a revolving door..

Temple has been good in the East.
USF has turned it on in the East.


ECU, UC, UCF, and UCONN have all basically sucked as a group

1. Temple
2. USF
3. AAC WEST

AAC West is best if they shed SMU and Tulane. They can come back to C-USA to play Rice again.

(11-25-2016 09:00 PM)Hurricane Drummer Wrote:  

(11-25-2016 05:59 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Top 25 wins

AAC West - 4

All Of The B12 - 3

Top 25 Win Percent

AAC West - 4 of 7 ( 57% )

All of the B12 - 3 of 21 ( 14% )

Suck it.

To be fair, the Big 12 will have 4 top 25 wins after the Bedlam game next week. OU and OSU are both top 10 with a bye this week. But the West Division is pretty darn good regardless.

While that game adds a win in that category it also adds a loss for a net gain of ZERO.

(11-26-2016 11:55 AM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(11-25-2016 09:00 PM)Hurricane Drummer Wrote:  

(11-25-2016 05:59 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Top 25 wins

AAC West - 4

All Of The B12 - 3

Top 25 Win Percent

AAC West - 4 of 7 ( 57% )

All of the B12 - 3 of 21 ( 14% )

Suck it.

To be fair, the Big 12 will have 4 top 25 wins after the Bedlam game next week. OU and OSU are both top 10 with a bye this week. But the West Division is pretty darn good regardless.

While that game adds a win in that category it also adds a loss for a net gain of ZERO.

yep, it will do nothing for their crappy win percentage versus top 25 teams.

(11-26-2016 12:55 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-26-2016 11:55 AM)sfink16 Wrote:  

(11-25-2016 09:00 PM)Hurricane Drummer Wrote:  

(11-25-2016 05:59 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Top 25 wins

AAC West - 4

All Of The B12 - 3

Top 25 Win Percent

AAC West - 4 of 7 ( 57% )

All of the B12 - 3 of 21 ( 14% )

Suck it.

To be fair, the Big 12 will have 4 top 25 wins after the Bedlam game next week. OU and OSU are both top 10 with a bye this week. But the West Division is pretty darn good regardless.

While that game adds a win in that category it also adds a loss for a net gain of ZERO.

yep, it will do nothing for their crappy win percentage versus top 25 teams.

True

(11-25-2016 09:25 PM)Tigersmoke3 Wrote:  This is the type of information that should not only be posted here but on the conference realignment board. Maybe we have to be the ones who spread the truth about our conference, some people really just don't know and espn damn sure isn't going to do it for us. I think that WMU is being pushed by them to make it seem that all g5s are interchangeable. However once WMU gets skull dragged by a decent p5 team on national television with only a couple of thousand of their fans in attendance it would allow them to paint us all with that narrative again.

I'm doing my part now in the "If the committee has any credibility..." thread. I didn't post the OP stat though...yet.

(11-26-2016 10:43 AM)westsidewolf1989 Wrote:  AAC West is best if they shed SMU and Tulane. They can come back to C-USA to play Rice again.

Ah...proof Rice admits lesser candidates too! We beat UH better than anyone has over the past 2 seasons and will be much better next year. Tulane is going to be better as well. West is improving, and several of those lower east teams will too. If this league is marketed right, sky is the limit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk