Jesterondirt
Real racing happens on dirt!
Posts: 5,830
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 128
I Root For: GoldenHurricane
Location:
|
RE: AP Poll
Do you guys think we'll (Tulsa) be ranked if we beat Cincinnati and win our bowl game?
|
|
11-22-2016 01:04 PM |
|
Pony94
Moderator
Posts: 25,680
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 1184
I Root For: SMU
Location: Bee Cave, TX
|
|
11-22-2016 02:01 PM |
|
Chappy
Resident Goonie
Posts: 18,896
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 899
I Root For: ECU
Location: Raleigh, NC
|
RE: AP Poll
Navy should be in the top 25... only losses are to 8-3 Air Force (rivalry game) and 9-2 South Florida, both on the road.
|
|
11-22-2016 02:10 PM |
|
Westhoff123
Dr. Doom
Posts: 11,291
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 208
I Root For: UH
Location: Houston, TX
|
AP Poll
(11-22-2016 02:10 PM)Chappy Wrote: Navy should be in the top 25... only losses are to 8-3 Air Force (rivalry game) and 9-2 South Florida, both on the road.
Should be but they wont. Wether people like to admit it or not navy beating ND by only one point hurt them in the eyes of voters.
|
|
11-22-2016 02:18 PM |
|
TrojanCampaign
All American
Posts: 4,694
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 170
I Root For: USC, AAMU,
Location: Huntsville
|
RE: AP Poll
(11-20-2016 10:10 PM)USNA9t8 Wrote: (11-20-2016 09:40 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote: (11-20-2016 09:38 PM)PurpleReigns2012 Wrote: (11-20-2016 09:29 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote: (11-20-2016 09:26 PM)BigHouston Wrote: Only thing separating the AAC from the so called p5 is not having 1 or 2 big name programs and the $$$ they're over paying themselves.
That and autonomy along with a good tie-in bowl. The P% has to vote to give us autonomy which I never see happening, but the the tie in bowl should be another story.
Expand playoffs and do away with bowls.
True it would also essentially make the P5/G5 thing meaningless becuase everything would be equal other than autonomy and the money.
The BCS and now the playoff system is how we got into this problem. The solution isn't to go further into the mess, it's to back away from the mistakes we've made.
IMHO, we should do away with the conference tie-ins (with the exception of the historic bowls like the Rose bowl) and make all the bowls "at-large."
Well that's the real problem.
If you give the Rose Bowl an exception then the SEC is going to come and say why do they get an exception? And the ACC/Big12 will do the same. Thus you have contract bowls.
|
|
11-22-2016 04:26 PM |
|
Westhoff123
Dr. Doom
Posts: 11,291
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 208
I Root For: UH
Location: Houston, TX
|
RE: AP Poll
(11-22-2016 04:26 PM)TrojanCampaign Wrote: (11-20-2016 10:10 PM)USNA9t8 Wrote: (11-20-2016 09:40 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote: (11-20-2016 09:38 PM)PurpleReigns2012 Wrote: (11-20-2016 09:29 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote: That and autonomy along with a good tie-in bowl. The P% has to vote to give us autonomy which I never see happening, but the the tie in bowl should be another story.
Expand playoffs and do away with bowls.
True it would also essentially make the P5/G5 thing meaningless becuase everything would be equal other than autonomy and the money.
The BCS and now the playoff system is how we got into this problem. The solution isn't to go further into the mess, it's to back away from the mistakes we've made.
IMHO, we should do away with the conference tie-ins (with the exception of the historic bowls like the Rose bowl) and make all the bowls "at-large."
Well that's the real problem.
If you give the Rose Bowl an exception then the SEC is going to come and say why do they get an exception? And the ACC/Big12 will do the same. Thus you have contract bowls.
Yup an expanded playoff is the ultimately the best route to go.
|
|
11-22-2016 04:36 PM |
|
willhclark
1st String
Posts: 1,503
Joined: Aug 2007
Reputation: 11
I Root For: Houston Cougars
Location: Austin, Texas
|
RE: AP Poll
Like Tom Herman said there is a huge double standard. Houston should be in the top 10.
(This post was last modified: 11-22-2016 06:25 PM by willhclark.)
|
|
11-22-2016 06:24 PM |
|
USNA9t8
Bench Warmer
Posts: 214
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 14
I Root For: Navy
Location:
|
RE: AP Poll
(11-22-2016 04:26 PM)TrojanCampaign Wrote: (11-20-2016 10:10 PM)USNA9t8 Wrote: (11-20-2016 09:40 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote: (11-20-2016 09:38 PM)PurpleReigns2012 Wrote: (11-20-2016 09:29 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote: That and autonomy along with a good tie-in bowl. The P% has to vote to give us autonomy which I never see happening, but the the tie in bowl should be another story.
Expand playoffs and do away with bowls.
True it would also essentially make the P5/G5 thing meaningless becuase everything would be equal other than autonomy and the money.
The BCS and now the playoff system is how we got into this problem. The solution isn't to go further into the mess, it's to back away from the mistakes we've made.
IMHO, we should do away with the conference tie-ins (with the exception of the historic bowls like the Rose bowl) and make all the bowls "at-large."
Well that's the real problem.
If you give the Rose Bowl an exception then the SEC is going to come and say why do they get an exception? And the ACC/Big12 will do the same. Thus you have contract bowls.
Limited tie-ins and the bowl system worked well for a long, long time. However, if we are no longer capable of restraint and discretion, and we have to do away with all tie-ins to kill this recent P-5 monstrosity, then so be it.
(This post was last modified: 11-22-2016 06:31 PM by USNA9t8.)
|
|
11-22-2016 06:29 PM |
|