Includes the AAC and not the B12.

http://realtimerpi.com/college_football/...f_Men.html

(11-20-2016 03:06 PM)Knightbengal Wrote:  Includes the AAC and not the B12.

http://realtimerpi.com/college_football/...f_Men.html

Those ratings are so bogus.

#6 FSU (8-3)
#8 UNC (8-3)
#11 Tennessee (8-3)
#17 Washington (10-1)
#28 Colorado (9-2)

I don't believe those ratings are anywhere near correct.

(11-20-2016 03:53 PM)Insane_Baboon Wrote:  

(11-20-2016 03:06 PM)Knightbengal Wrote:  Includes the AAC and not the B12.

http://realtimerpi.com/college_football/...f_Men.html

Those ratings are so bogus.

#6 FSU (8-3)
#8 UNC (8-3)
#11 Tennessee (8-3)
#17 Washington (10-1)
#28 Colorado (9-2)

I don't believe those ratings are anywhere near correct.

There are some odd numbers in there indeed. Sun Belt is ranked higher than the MAC? Maybe SB will become a "P5" to these guys in a couple years!
Cheers!

(11-20-2016 06:16 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(11-20-2016 03:53 PM)Insane_Baboon Wrote:  

(11-20-2016 03:06 PM)Knightbengal Wrote:  Includes the AAC and not the B12.

http://realtimerpi.com/college_football/...f_Men.html

Those ratings are so bogus.

#6 FSU (8-3)
#8 UNC (8-3)
#11 Tennessee (8-3)
#17 Washington (10-1)
#28 Colorado (9-2)

I don't believe those ratings are anywhere near correct.

There are some odd numbers in there indeed. Sun Belt is ranked higher than the MAC? Maybe SB will become a "P5" to these guys in a couple years!
Cheers!

Do not knock SunBelt teams, they WILL beat yo ass!

(11-20-2016 03:53 PM)Insane_Baboon Wrote:  

(11-20-2016 03:06 PM)Knightbengal Wrote:  Includes the AAC and not the B12.

http://realtimerpi.com/college_football/...f_Men.html

Those ratings are so bogus.

#6 FSU (8-3)
#8 UNC (8-3)
#11 Tennessee (8-3)
#17 Washington (10-1)
#28 Colorado (9-2)

I don't believe those ratings are anywhere near correct.

SOS influences RPI plus where you play the games.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

(11-20-2016 06:16 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(11-20-2016 03:53 PM)Insane_Baboon Wrote:  

(11-20-2016 03:06 PM)Knightbengal Wrote:  Includes the AAC and not the B12.

http://realtimerpi.com/college_football/...f_Men.html

Those ratings are so bogus.

#6 FSU (8-3)
#8 UNC (8-3)
#11 Tennessee (8-3)
#17 Washington (10-1)
#28 Colorado (9-2)

I don't believe those ratings are anywhere near correct.

There are some odd numbers in there indeed. Sun Belt is ranked higher than the MAC? Maybe SB will become a "P5" to these guys in a couple years!
Cheers!

SunBelt is higher because they never removed UMass from the MAC.

(11-20-2016 06:16 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(11-20-2016 03:53 PM)Insane_Baboon Wrote:  

(11-20-2016 03:06 PM)Knightbengal Wrote:  Includes the AAC and not the B12.

http://realtimerpi.com/college_football/...f_Men.html

Those ratings are so bogus.

#6 FSU (8-3)
#8 UNC (8-3)
#11 Tennessee (8-3)
#17 Washington (10-1)
#28 Colorado (9-2)

I don't believe those ratings are anywhere near correct.

There are some odd numbers in there indeed. Sun Belt is ranked higher than the MAC? Maybe SB will become a "P5" to these guys in a couple years!
Cheers!

The primary thing to take away from these statistics is the slippage of the Big 12...

When there is a much smaller gap between 5-6 as opposed to 6-7, it's only natural people are going to start asking questions.

For sure. With my computer models the Big 12 is still ahead of the AAC but it's closer to the AAC than it is to the next P5 conference. The AAC is also significantly ahead of any other G5.